Interdisciplinary strategies to enable data-driven plant breeding in a changing climate

Summary This perspective lays out a framework to enable the breeding of crops that can meet worldwide demand under the challenges of global climate change. Past work in various fields has produced multiple prediction methods to contribute to different plant breeding objectives. Our proposed framework focuses on the integration of these methods into decision-support tools that quantify the effects on multiple objectives of decisions made throughout the plant breeding pipeline. We discuss the complementarities among these methods with an emphasis on integration into tools that utilize operations research and systems approaches to help plant breeders rapidly and optimally design new cultivars under extant time, cost, and environmental constraints. In illustrating this potential, we demonstrate the interconnectedness and probabilistic nature of plant breeding objectives and highlight research opportunities to refine and combine knowledge across multiple disciplines. Such a framework can help plant breeders more efficiently breed for future environments, including so-called minor crops, leading to an overall increase in the resiliency of global food production systems.

[1]  Edward S. Buckler,et al.  TASSEL: software for association mapping of complex traits in diverse samples , 2007, Bioinform..

[2]  Anne D. Bjorkman,et al.  Increasing homogeneity in global food supplies and the implications for food security , 2014, Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences.

[3]  Sanzhen Liu,et al.  tGBS® genotyping-by-sequencing enables reliable genotyping of heterozygous loci , 2017, Nucleic acids research.

[4]  Jacob D. Washburn,et al.  Predictive breeding for maize: Making use of molecular phenotypes, machine learning, and physiological crop models , 2019 .

[5]  Peter J. Bradbury,et al.  The genetic architecture of teosinte catalyzed and constrained maize domestication , 2019, Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences.

[6]  J. Woolliams,et al.  Potential of promotion of alleles by genome editing to improve quantitative traits in livestock breeding programs , 2015, Genetics Selection Evolution.

[7]  Daniel Gianola,et al.  Kernel-based whole-genome prediction of complex traits: a review , 2014, Front. Genet..

[8]  Senthold Asseng,et al.  An overview of APSIM, a model designed for farming systems simulation , 2003 .

[9]  David B. Lobell,et al.  Why are agricultural impacts of climate change so uncertain? The importance of temperature relative to precipitation , 2008, Environmental Research Letters.

[10]  Meng Li,et al.  Genetics and population analysis Advance Access publication July 13, 2012 , 2012 .

[11]  Ashutosh Kumar Singh,et al.  Deep Learning for Plant Stress Phenotyping: Trends and Future Perspectives. , 2018, Trends in plant science.

[12]  James W. Jones,et al.  Modeling the Effects of Genotypic and Environmental Variation on Maize Phenology: The Phenology Subroutine of the AgMaize Crop Model , 2018, Agronomy Monographs.

[13]  Tara F Deubel,et al.  Persistent Hunger: Perspectives on Vulnerability, Famine, and Food Security in , 2006 .

[14]  Luis Perez,et al.  The Effectiveness of Data Augmentation in Image Classification using Deep Learning , 2017, ArXiv.

[15]  Lizhi Wang,et al.  Crop Yield Prediction Using Deep Neural Networks , 2019, Front. Plant Sci..

[16]  Peter J. Bradbury,et al.  Dysregulation of expression correlates with rare-allele burden and fitness loss in maize , 2018, Nature.

[17]  José Crossa,et al.  A data-driven simulation platform to predict cultivars’ performances under uncertain weather conditions , 2020, Nature Communications.

[18]  Vernon W. Ruttan,et al.  Agricultural Research Policy , 1982 .

[19]  W. Beavis,et al.  Systematic design for trait introgression projects , 2017, Theoretical and Applied Genetics.

[20]  J. Weiner Looking in the Wrong Direction for Higher-Yielding Crop Genotypes. , 2019, Trends in plant science.

[21]  Pjotr Prins,et al.  Private Genomes and Public SNPs: Homomorphic encryption of genotypes and phenotypes for shared quantitative genetics , 2020, bioRxiv.

[22]  S. Chapman,et al.  Breeder friendly phenotyping. , 2020, Plant science : an international journal of experimental plant biology.

[23]  Jun Wang,et al.  Analytical and Decision Support Tools for Genomics-Assisted Breeding. , 2016, Trends in plant science.

[24]  Sanzhen Liu,et al.  Substantial contribution of genetic variation in the expression of transcription factors to phenotypic variation revealed by eRD-GWAS , 2017, Genome Biology.

[25]  Shafi Goldwasser,et al.  Secure large-scale genome-wide association studies using homomorphic encryption , 2020, Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences.

[26]  D. Easterling,et al.  Observations: Atmosphere and surface , 2013 .

[27]  Francois Tardieu,et al.  Modelling strategies for assessing and increasing the effectiveness of new phenotyping techniques in plant breeding. , 2019, Plant science : an international journal of experimental plant biology.

[28]  B. Walsh,et al.  Models for navigating biological complexity in breeding improved crop plants. , 2006, Trends in plant science.

[29]  R. Horton,et al.  Net benefits to US soy and maize yields from intensifying hourly rainfall , 2020, Nature Climate Change.

[30]  M. Olsen,et al.  Enhancing genetic gain in the era of molecular breeding , 2017, Journal of experimental botany.

[31]  Raziel A. Ordóñez,et al.  Predicting crop yields and soil‐plant nitrogen dynamics in the US Corn Belt , 2020 .

[32]  Enli Wang,et al.  A generic approach to modelling, allocation and redistribution of biomass to and from plant organs , 2019, in silico Plants.

[33]  David Tilman,et al.  National food production stabilized by crop diversity , 2019, Nature.

[34]  Eric Rodene,et al.  Semantic Segmentation of Sorghum Using Hyperspectral Data Identifies Genetic Associations , 2020, Plant phenomics.

[35]  E. Fischer,et al.  Frequency of extreme precipitation increases extensively with event rareness under global warming , 2019, Scientific Reports.

[36]  G. Hammer,et al.  Crop science: A foundation for advancing predictive agriculture , 2020, Crop Science.

[37]  R. W. Allard,et al.  Implications of Genotype‐Environmental Interactions in Applied Plant Breeding1 , 1964 .

[38]  Xiangfeng Wang,et al.  Machine learning for Big Data analytics in plants. , 2014, Trends in plant science.

[39]  D. W. Franzen,et al.  Educational Needs of Precision Agriculture , 2002, Precision Agriculture.

[40]  Kurt Hornik,et al.  Universal approximation of an unknown mapping and its derivatives using multilayer feedforward networks , 1990, Neural Networks.

[41]  Darwin A. Campbell,et al.  Assessing plant performance in the Enviratron , 2019, Plant Methods.

[42]  Daniel Wallach,et al.  A new approach to crop model calibration: Phenotyping plus post‐processing , 2020 .

[43]  Francois Tardieu,et al.  On the dynamic determinants of reproductive failure under drought in maize , 2019, in silico Plants.

[44]  Frank Technow,et al.  Leveraging biological insight and environmental variation to improve phenotypic prediction: Integrating crop growth models (CGM) with whole genome prediction (WGP) , 2017, bioRxiv.

[45]  Fred van Eeuwijk,et al.  Intercontinental prediction of soybean phenology via hybrid ensemble of knowledge-based and data-driven models , 2020, bioRxiv.

[46]  R. Richards,et al.  Prognosis for genetic improvement of yield potential and water-limited yield of major grain crops. , 2013 .

[47]  A. F. Troyer Adaptedness and heterosis in corn and mule hybrids , 2006 .

[48]  Jeffrey W. White,et al.  Estimating parametric phenotypes that determine anthesis date in Zea mays: Challenges in combining ecophysiological models with genetics , 2018, PloS one.

[49]  R. Bernardo Prospective Targeted Recombination and Genetic Gains for Quantitative Traits in Maize , 2017, The plant genome.

[50]  G. Hammer,et al.  Characterizing drought stress and trait influence on maize yield under current and future conditions , 2014, Global change biology.

[51]  G. Hammer,et al.  Integrating genetic gain and gap analysis to predict improvements in crop productivity , 2020 .

[52]  H. Piepho,et al.  Enviromics in breeding: applications and perspectives on envirotypic-assisted selection , 2020, Theoretical and Applied Genetics.

[53]  M. Sorrells,et al.  Genomic Selection for Crop Improvement , 2009 .

[54]  P. Schnable,et al.  Genomic prediction contributing to a promising global strategy to turbocharge gene banks , 2016, Nature Plants.

[55]  Han Liu,et al.  Evolutionary and functional genomics of DNA methylation in maize domestication and improvement , 2020, bioRxiv.

[56]  M. Edgerton,et al.  Increasing Crop Productivity to Meet Global Needs for Feed, Food, and Fuel , 2009, Plant Physiology.

[57]  William Stafford Noble,et al.  Machine learning applications in genetics and genomics , 2015, Nature Reviews Genetics.

[58]  Andrew J. Challinor,et al.  Current warming will reduce yields unless maize breeding and seed systems adapt immediately , 2016 .

[59]  Jason M. Beddow,et al.  A Bounds Analysis of World Food Futures: Global Agriculture Through to 2050 , 2014 .

[60]  Bruce Erickson,et al.  Setting the Record Straight on Precision Agriculture Adoption , 2019, Agronomy Journal.

[61]  Alain Charcosset,et al.  Genomic prediction of maize yield across European environmental conditions , 2019, Nature Genetics.

[62]  Joshua A. Udall,et al.  Breeding for Quantitative Traits in Plants , 2003 .

[63]  F. Tardieu,et al.  The Physiological Basis of Drought Tolerance in Crop Plants: A Scenario-Dependent Probabilistic Approach. , 2018, Annual review of plant biology.

[64]  D. Duvick Genetic progress in yield of United States maize (Zea mays L.) , 2005 .

[65]  R. Elmore,et al.  Soybean Seed Yield and Composition Response to Stand Reduction at Vegetative and Reproductive Stages , 2008 .

[66]  J. Batley,et al.  Speed breeding: a powerful tool to accelerate crop research and breeding , 2017, bioRxiv.

[67]  Juraj Balkovic,et al.  Consistent negative response of US crops to high temperatures in observations and crop models , 2017, Nature Communications.

[68]  J. Jannink,et al.  Improving Genomic Prediction in Cassava Field Experiments by Accounting for Interplot Competition , 2018, G3: Genes, Genomes, Genetics.

[69]  David Foster,et al.  Advanced Analytics for Agricultural Product Development , 2016, Interfaces.

[70]  José Crossa,et al.  A reaction norm model for genomic selection using high-dimensional genomic and environmental data , 2013, Theoretical and Applied Genetics.

[71]  D. Byerlee,et al.  Crop yields and global food security: will yield increase continue to feed the world? , 2014 .

[72]  B. Craig,et al.  Walking through the statistical black boxes of plant breeding , 2016, Theoretical and Applied Genetics.

[73]  James W. Jones,et al.  Efficient crop model parameter estimation and site characterization using large breeding trial data sets , 2017 .

[74]  H. Piepho,et al.  Heritability in Plant Breeding on a Genotype-Difference Basis , 2019, Genetics.

[75]  Athanasios Petsakos,et al.  CGIAR modeling approaches for resource‐constrained scenarios: II. Models for analyzing socioeconomic factors to improve policy recommendations , 2020 .

[76]  L. Totir,et al.  Predicting the future of plant breeding: complementing empirical evaluation with genetic prediction , 2014, Crop and Pasture Science.

[77]  R. A. Fischer,et al.  Breeding and Cereal Yield Progress , 2010 .

[78]  Graeme L. Hammer,et al.  Evaluating Plant Breeding Strategies by Simulating Gene Action and Dryland Environment Effects , 2003, Agronomy Journal.

[79]  James W. Jones,et al.  Potential benefits of climate forecasting to agriculture , 2000 .

[80]  Changying Li,et al.  Convolutional Neural Networks for Image-Based High-Throughput Plant Phenotyping: A Review , 2020, Plant phenomics.

[81]  P. Schnable,et al.  Multi-trait Genomic Selection Methods for Crop Improvement , 2020, Genetics.

[82]  J. Jannink Dynamics of long-term genomic selection , 2010, Genetics Selection Evolution.

[83]  Joseph L. Gage,et al.  Comparing Genome-Wide Association Study Results from Different Measurements of an Underlying Phenotype , 2018, G3: Genes, Genomes, Genetics.

[84]  G. Hammer,et al.  Designing crops for adaptation to the drought and high‐temperature risks anticipated in future climates , 2020 .

[85]  S. Huet,et al.  Whole-genome prediction of reaction norms to environmental stress in bread wheat (Triticum aestivum L.) by genomic random regression , 2018 .

[86]  Monia Santini,et al.  An overview of available crop growth and yield models for studies and assessments in agriculture. , 2016, Journal of the science of food and agriculture.

[87]  S. Hearne,et al.  Initiating maize pre-breeding programs using genomic selection to harness polygenic variation from landrace populations , 2016, BMC Genomics.

[88]  B. Muller,et al.  Plant and crop simulation models: powerful tools to link physiology, genetics, and phenomics. , 2019, Journal of experimental botany.

[89]  John M. Antle,et al.  Brief history of agricultural systems modeling , 2017, Agricultural systems.

[90]  G. de los Campos,et al.  Genomic Selection in Plant Breeding: Methods, Models, and Perspectives. , 2017, Trends in plant science.

[91]  James Taylor,et al.  Next-generation sequencing data interpretation: enhancing reproducibility and accessibility , 2012, Nature Reviews Genetics.

[92]  Yufeng Ge,et al.  Conventional and hyperspectral time-series imaging of maize lines widely used in field trials , 2017, bioRxiv.

[93]  Carson M. Andorf,et al.  Technological advances in maize breeding: past, present and future , 2019, Theoretical and Applied Genetics.

[94]  Deniz Akdemir,et al.  Integrating environmental covariates and crop modeling into the genomic selection framework to predict genotype by environment interactions , 2013, Theoretical and Applied Genetics.

[95]  Jacob D. Washburn,et al.  Evolutionarily informed deep learning methods for predicting relative transcript abundance from DNA sequence , 2019, Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences.

[96]  G. Hammer,et al.  Simulating the Yield Impacts of Organ-Level Quantitative Trait Loci Associated With Drought Response in Maize: A “Gene-to-Phenotype” Modeling Approach , 2009, Genetics.

[97]  D. Akdemir,et al.  Efficient Breeding by Genomic Mating , 2016, bioRxiv.

[98]  T. Shepherd Atmospheric circulation as a source of uncertainty in climate change projections , 2014 .

[99]  James W. Jones,et al.  Putting mechanisms into crop production models. , 2013, Plant, cell & environment.

[100]  M. E. Otegui,et al.  Co-ordination between leaf initiation and leaf appearance in field-grown maize (Zea mays): genotypic differences in response of rates to temperature. , 2005, Annals of botany.

[101]  Mohsen Shahhosseini,et al.  Maize yield and nitrate loss prediction with machine learning algorithms , 2019, Environmental Research Letters.

[102]  J. Araus,et al.  Field high-throughput phenotyping: the new crop breeding frontier. , 2014, Trends in plant science.

[103]  Neil I. Huth,et al.  Enhancing APSIM to simulate excessive moisture effects on root growth , 2019, Field Crops Research.

[104]  Jean-Luc Jannink,et al.  Genomic selection in plant breeding: from theory to practice. , 2010, Briefings in functional genomics.

[105]  M. Goddard,et al.  Prediction of total genetic value using genome-wide dense marker maps. , 2001, Genetics.

[106]  B. Haussmann,et al.  A unified strategy for West African pearl millet hybrid and heterotic group development , 2020 .

[107]  H. Piepho,et al.  Heritability in Plant Breeding on a Genotype-Difference Basis. , 2019, Genetics.

[108]  G. Spangenberg,et al.  Selection on Optimal Haploid Value Increases Genetic Gain and Preserves More Genetic Diversity Relative to Genomic Selection , 2015, Genetics.

[109]  Ashutosh Kumar Singh,et al.  Machine Learning for High-Throughput Stress Phenotyping in Plants. , 2016, Trends in plant science.

[110]  M. Zaman-Allah,et al.  Translating High-Throughput Phenotyping into Genetic Gain , 2018, Trends in plant science.

[111]  James Hansen,et al.  Land allocation conditioned on El Niño-Southern Oscillation phases in the Pampas of Argentina☆ , 1999 .

[112]  P. Schnable,et al.  Improving Response in Genomic Selection with a Population-Based Selection Strategy: Optimal Population Value Selection , 2017, Genetics.

[113]  G. Hammer,et al.  Modelling the nitrogen dynamics of maize crops – Enhancing the APSIM maize model , 2018, European Journal of Agronomy.

[114]  John M. Antle,et al.  Toward a new generation of agricultural system data, models, and knowledge products: State of agricultural systems science , 2017, Agricultural systems.

[115]  R. Bernardo,et al.  Prospects for genomewide selection for quantitative traits in maize , 2007 .

[116]  R. Bernardo Breeding for Quantitative Traits in Plants , 2002 .

[117]  Robert J. Elshire,et al.  A Robust, Simple Genotyping-by-Sequencing (GBS) Approach for High Diversity Species , 2011, PloS one.

[118]  Frank Technow,et al.  Integrating Crop Growth Models with Whole Genome Prediction through Approximate Bayesian Computation , 2015, bioRxiv.

[119]  P. Schnable,et al.  Shared Genetic Control of Root System Architecture between Zea mays and Sorghum bicolor1[OPEN] , 2019, Plant Physiology.

[120]  James C. Schnable,et al.  Increased Power and Accuracy of Causal Locus Identification in Time Series Genome-wide Association in Sorghum1[OPEN] , 2020, Plant Physiology.

[121]  Jochem Marotzke,et al.  Quantifying the irreducible uncertainty in near‐term climate projections , 2018, WIREs Climate Change.

[122]  M. Cooper,et al.  Accelerating crop genetic gains with genomic selection , 2018, Theoretical and Applied Genetics.

[123]  F. Checchi,et al.  Viewpoint: Determining famine: Multi-dimensional analysis for the twenty-first century , 2020 .

[124]  E. Hawkins,et al.  The potential to narrow uncertainty in projections of regional precipitation change , 2011 .

[125]  G. de los Campos,et al.  Can Deep Learning Improve Genomic Prediction of Complex Human Traits? , 2018, Genetics.

[126]  Peter J. Bradbury,et al.  Recombination in diverse maize is stable, predictable, and associated with genetic load , 2015, Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences.

[127]  K. Cassman Ecological intensification of cereal production systems: yield potential, soil quality, and precision agriculture. , 1999, Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America.

[128]  Jordan M. Eizenga,et al.  Genome graphs and the evolution of genome inference , 2017, bioRxiv.