Integrative genomic and functional analyses reveal neuronal subtype differentiation bias in human embryonic stem cell lines

The self-renewal and differentiation potential of human embryonic stem cells (hESCs) suggests that hESCs could be used for regenerative medicine, especially for restoring neuronal functions in brain diseases. However, the functional properties of neurons derived from hESC are largely unknown. Moreover, because hESCs were derived under diverse conditions, the possibility arises that neurons derived from different hESC lines exhibit distinct properties, but this possibility remains unexplored. To address these issues, we developed a protocol that allows stepwise generation from hESCs of cultures composed of ≈70–80% human neurons that exhibit spontaneous synaptic network activity. Comparison of neurons derived from the well characterized HSF1 and HSF6 hESC lines revealed that HSF1- but not HSF6-derived neurons exhibit forebrain properties. Accordingly, HSF1-derived neurons initially form primarily GABAergic synaptic networks, whereas HSF6-derived neurons initially form glutamatergic networks. microRNA profiling revealed significant expression differences between the two hESC lines, suggesting that microRNAs may influence their distinct differentiation properties. These observations indicate that although both HSF1 and HSF6 hESCs differentiate into functional neurons, the two hESC lines exhibit distinct differentiation potentials, suggesting that they are preprogrammed. Information on hESC line-specific differentiation biases is crucial for neural stem cell therapy and establishment of novel disease models using hESCs.

[1]  M. Goulding,et al.  Tlx3 and Tlx1 are post-mitotic selector genes determining glutamatergic over GABAergic cell fates , 2004, Nature Neuroscience.

[2]  Murat Gunel,et al.  Sequence Variants in SLITRK1 Are Associated with Tourette's Syndrome , 2005, Science.

[3]  Elaine Fuchs,et al.  Differential regulation of midbrain dopaminergic neuron development by Wnt-1, Wnt-3a, and Wnt-5a , 2003, Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America.

[4]  C. Walsh,et al.  Sequential phases of cortical specification involve Neurogenin‐dependent and ‐independent pathways , 2004, The EMBO journal.

[5]  J. Castle,et al.  Microarray analysis shows that some microRNAs downregulate large numbers of target mRNAs , 2005, Nature.

[6]  Ryan T Rodriguez,et al.  Unique gene expression signatures of independently-derived human embryonic stem cell lines. , 2004, Human molecular genetics.

[7]  Stephen J. Smith,et al.  Cholesterol--Making or Breaking the Synapse , 2001, Science.

[8]  Robert A Pearce,et al.  Specification of motoneurons from human embryonic stem cells , 2005, Nature Biotechnology.

[9]  V. Ambros microRNAs Tiny Regulators with Great Potential , 2001, Cell.

[10]  M. Matzke,et al.  RNA: Guiding Gene Silencing , 2001, Science.

[11]  K. Kosik,et al.  Specific MicroRNAs Modulate Embryonic Stem Cell–Derived Neurogenesis , 2006, Stem cells.

[12]  J. Thomson,et al.  Embryonic stem cell lines derived from human blastocysts. , 1998, Science.

[13]  D. Kaufman,et al.  Multilineage Differentiation from Human Embryonic Stem Cell Lines , 2001, Stem cells.

[14]  B. Barres,et al.  Control of synapse number by glia. , 2001, Science.

[15]  A. Trounson,et al.  Embryonic stem cell lines from human blastocysts: somatic differentiation in vitro , 2000, Nature Biotechnology.

[16]  C. Stiles,et al.  Molecular mechanisms controlling cortical gliogenesis , 2002, Current Opinion in Neurobiology.

[17]  K. Mizuseki,et al.  Directed differentiation of telencephalic precursors from embryonic stem cells , 2005, Nature Neuroscience.

[18]  R. Pearce,et al.  Functional Neural Development from Human Embryonic Stem Cells: Accelerated Synaptic Activity via Astrocyte Coculture , 2007, The Journal of Neuroscience.

[19]  Olga Varlamova,et al.  A cAMP-response element binding protein-induced microRNA regulates neuronal morphogenesis. , 2005, Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America.

[20]  W. Freed,et al.  Dopaminergic Differentiation of Human Embryonic Stem Cells , 2004, Stem cells.

[21]  D. Wilkin,et al.  Neuron , 2001, Brain Research.

[22]  L. Allen Stem cells. , 2003, The New England journal of medicine.

[23]  T. Südhof,et al.  Autonomous Function of Synaptotagmin 1 in Triggering Synchronous Release Independent of Asynchronous Release , 2005, Neuron.

[24]  J. Loring,et al.  Establishing Standards for the Characterization of Human Embryonic Stem Cell Lines , 2006, Stem cells.

[25]  Sally Temple,et al.  The development of neural stem cells , 2001, Nature.

[26]  R. Rosenfeld Nature , 2009, Otolaryngology--head and neck surgery : official journal of American Academy of Otolaryngology-Head and Neck Surgery.

[27]  Wei Cui,et al.  Differentiation of Human Embryonic Stem Cells to Neural Lineages in Adherent Culture by Blocking Bone Morphogenetic Protein Signaling , 2005, Stem cells.

[28]  Lin He,et al.  MicroRNAs: small RNAs with a big role in gene regulation , 2004, Nature reviews genetics.

[29]  V. Ambros MicroRNA Pathways in Flies and Worms Growth, Death, Fat, Stress, and Timing , 2003, Cell.

[30]  S. Moon,et al.  Human embryonic stem cells express a unique set of microRNAs. , 2004, Developmental biology.

[31]  Zhiping P. Pang,et al.  Monitoring synaptic transmission in primary neuronal cultures using local extracellular stimulation , 2007, Journal of Neuroscience Methods.

[32]  W. Ge,et al.  Making and repairing the mammalian brain--signaling toward neurogenesis and gliogenesis. , 2003, Seminars in cell & developmental biology.

[33]  F. Gage,et al.  Development of functional human embryonic stem cell-derived neurons in mouse brain. , 2005, Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America.