The use of forest maps for the description of wildlife habitats: limits and recommendations

We evaluated the reliability of forest maps for describing wildlife habitats. During the summer of 1997, we sampled 186 boreal forest stands located in Jacques-Cartier Park, Quebec. In each stand, we measured slope, crown closure, basal area, as well as tree height and age. We determined if map classifications, with regard to dominant species composition, density, tree height, tree age, and slope, correlated with field observations. We also measured lateral cover and deciduous browse availability, variables that are considered useful for the characterization of wildlife habitats, to examine how these habitat features were related to map classification. Age (57% of the sites correctly classified) and density (34%) were the variables for which map classification had the best and worst correspondence with field measurements, respectively. Dominant species on maps were correctly identified in <74, <55, and <40% of the sites in coniferous, mixed, and deciduous stands, respectively. The use of a simple classifi...

[1]  B. Roberts,et al.  A review of forest site classification activities in Newfoundland and Labrador , 1992 .

[2]  J. Ouellet,et al.  Space and habitat use by the threatened Gaspé caribou in southeastern Quebec , 1996 .

[3]  C. Bowling,et al.  Forest site classification in New Brunswick , 1992 .

[4]  Clyde W. Neu,et al.  A TECHNIQUE FOR ANALYSIS OF UTILIZATION- AVAILABILITY DATA' , 1974 .

[5]  Louis Bélanger,et al.  Validité de la carte forestière pour décrire les habitats fauniques à l'échelle locale : une étude de cas en Abitibi-Témiscamingue , 1999 .

[6]  A. Allen Habitat Suitability Index Models: Moose, Lake Superior Region. , 1987 .

[7]  Bryan F. J. Manly,et al.  Assessing habitat selection when availability changes , 1996 .

[8]  D. Meidinger,et al.  Use of the biogeoclimatic ecosystem classification system in British Columbia , 1992 .

[9]  A. DesRochers,et al.  Is ring count at ground level a good estimation of black spruce age , 1997 .

[10]  B. Manly,et al.  Resource selection by animals: statistical design and analysis for field studies. , 1994 .

[11]  L. R. Grosenbaugh Plotless Timber Estimates—New, Fast, Easy , 1952 .

[12]  Dennis M. Heisey,et al.  Analyzing Selection Experiments with Log-Linear Models , 1985 .

[13]  I. Corns Forest site classification in Alberta: its evolution and present status , 1992 .

[14]  Kevin P. Kenow,et al.  Evaluating habitat selection with radio-telemetry triangulation error , 1992 .

[15]  User information needs for forest management site classification in Manitoba , 1992 .

[16]  F. Bunnell,et al.  Comparison of methods for estimating forest overstory cover. I: Observer effects , 1988 .

[17]  Y. Bergeron,et al.  Potentials and limitations of ecological classification as a tool for forest management : a case study of disturbed deciduous forests in Québec , 1995 .

[18]  D. Robert,et al.  Québec forest ecological classification program , 1992 .

[19]  Vilis O. Nams,et al.  Effects of radiotelemetry error on sample size and bias when testing for habitat selection , 1989 .

[20]  Douglas H. Johnson THE COMPARISON OF USAGE AND AVAILABILITY MEASUREMENTS FOR EVALUATING RESOURCE PREFERENCE , 1980 .

[21]  Nicholas J. Aebischer,et al.  Compositional Analysis of Habitat Use From Animal Radio-Tracking Data , 1993 .

[22]  Gary C. White,et al.  Accessing accuracy of a radiotelemetry system for estimating animal locations , 1985 .

[23]  Philip D. McLoughlin,et al.  Overcoming radiotelemetry bias in habitat- selection studies , 1999 .

[24]  Kim Lowell,et al.  Ground-truth verification of relations between forest basal area and certain ecophysiographic factors using a geographic information system , 1995 .

[25]  J. Ouellet,et al.  Use of forest maps versus field surveys to measure summer habitat selection and sexual segregation in northern white-tailed deer , 2002 .

[26]  J. R. Alldredge,et al.  Comparison of some statistical techniques for analysis of resource selection , 1986 .