Tablet Keyboard Configuration Affects Performance, Discomfort and Task Difficulty for Thumb Typing in a Two-Handed Grip

When holding a tablet computer with two hands, the touch keyboard configuration imposes postural constraints on the user because of the need to simultaneously hold the device and type with the thumbs. Designers have provided users with several possible keyboard configurations (device orientation, keyboard layout and location). However, potential differences in performance, usability and postures among these configurations have not been explored. We hypothesize that (1) the narrower standard keyboard layout in the portrait orientation leads to lower self-reported discomfort and less reach than the landscape orientation; (2) a split keyboard layout results in better overall outcomes compared to the standard layout; and (3) the conventional bottom keyboard location leads to the best outcomes overall compared to other locations. A repeated measures laboratory experiment of 12 tablet owners measured typing speed, discomfort, task difficulty, and thumb/wrist joint postures using an active marker system during typing tasks for different combinations of device orientation (portrait and landscape), keyboard layout (standard and split), and keyboard location (bottom, middle, top). The narrower standard keyboard with the device in the portrait orientation was associated with less discomfort (least squares mean (and S.E.) 2.9±0.6) than the landscape orientation (4.5±0.7). Additionally, the split keyboard decreased the amount of reaching required by the thumb in the landscape orientation as defined by a reduced range of motion and less MCP extension, which may have led to reduced discomfort (2.7±0.6) compared to the standard layout (4.5±0.7). However, typing speed was greater for the standard layout (127±5 char./min.) compared to the split layout (113±4 char./min.) regardless of device orientation and keyboard location. Usage guidelines and designers can incorporate these findings to optimize keyboard design parameters and form factors that promote user performance and usability for thumb interaction.

[1]  Jack T Dennerlein,et al.  Touch-screen tablet user configurations and case-supported tilt affect head and neck flexion angles. , 2012, Work.

[2]  Nicholas Alexander Hogg,et al.  Design of Thumb Keyboards: Performance, Effort and Kinematics , 2010 .

[3]  Fong-Chin Su,et al.  Feasibility of using surface markers for assessing motion of the thumb trapeziometacarpal joint. , 2003, Clinical biomechanics.

[4]  Dan Odell,et al.  Enabling comfortable thumb interaction in tablet computers: a Windows 8 case study , 2012 .

[5]  Jie Tang,et al.  Coordination of thumb joints during opposition. , 2007, Journal of biomechanics.

[6]  Hans-Jochen Heinze,et al.  Attention to adjacent and separate positions in space: An electrophysiological analysis , 1994, Perception & psychophysics.

[7]  L. M. Myers,et al.  The axes of rotation of the thumb interphalangeal and metacarpophalangeal joints. , 1995, Clinical orthopaedics and related research.

[8]  Jack T Dennerlein,et al.  Different computer tasks affect the exposure of the upper extremity to biomechanical risk factors , 2006, Ergonomics.

[9]  Emma Matthieson Yerba Buena Center for the Arts , 2008 .

[10]  Matthieu B. Trudeau,et al.  Thumb motor performance varies with thumb and wrist posture during single-handed mobile phone use. , 2012, Journal of biomechanics.

[11]  Fong-Chin Su,et al.  Feasibility of using a video-based motion analysis system for measuring thumb kinematics. , 2002, Journal of biomechanics.

[12]  Sung H. Han,et al.  Touch key design for one-handed thumb interaction with a mobile phone: Effects of touch key size and touch key location , 2010 .

[13]  Claire C. Gordon,et al.  Anthropometric Survey (ANSUR) II Pilot Study: Methods and Summary Statistics , 2009 .

[14]  R. L. Linscheid,et al.  The kinesiology of the thumb trapeziometacarpal joint. , 1981, The Journal of bone and joint surgery. American volume.

[15]  Amy K. Karlson,et al.  Thumb Motor Performance Varies by Movement Orientation, Direction, and Device Size During Single-Handed Mobile Phone Use , 2012, Hum. Factors.

[16]  Wendy E. Mackay,et al.  BiTouch and BiPad: designing bimanual interaction for hand-held tablets , 2012, CHI.

[17]  Hendrik Müller,et al.  Understanding tablet use: a multi-method exploration , 2012, Mobile HCI.

[18]  Sung H. Han,et al.  One-handed thumb interaction of mobile devices from the input accuracy perspective , 2010 .