Spatial Variation of Soil Lead in an Urban Community Garden: Implications for Risk‐Based Sampling

Soil lead pollution is a recalcitrant problem in urban areas resulting from a combination of historical residential, industrial, and transportation practices. The emergence of urban gardening movements in postindustrial cities necessitates accurate assessment of soil lead levels to ensure safe gardening. In this study, we examined small-scale spatial variability of soil lead within a 15 × 30 m urban garden plot established on two adjacent residential lots located in Detroit, Michigan, USA. Eighty samples collected using a variably spaced sampling grid were analyzed for total, fine fraction (less than 250 μm), and bioaccessible soil lead. Measured concentrations varied at sampling scales of 1-10 m and a hot spot exceeding 400 ppm total soil lead was identified in the northwest portion of the site. An interpolated map of total lead was treated as an exhaustive data set, and random sampling was simulated to generate Monte Carlo distributions and evaluate alternative sampling strategies intended to estimate the average soil lead concentration or detect hot spots. Increasing the number of individual samples decreases the probability of overlooking the hot spot (type II error). However, the practice of compositing and averaging samples decreased the probability of overestimating the mean concentration (type I error) at the expense of increasing the chance for type II error. The results reported here suggest a need to reconsider U.S. Environmental Protection Agency sampling objectives and consequent guidelines for reclaimed city lots where soil lead distributions are expected to be nonuniform.

[1]  Alexandre Boucher,et al.  Applied Geostatistics with SGeMS: A User's Guide , 2009 .

[2]  W. Dixon,et al.  Simplified Statistics for Small Numbers of Observations , 1951 .

[3]  L A Cox,et al.  Adaptive Spatial Sampling of Contaminated Soil , 1999, Risk analysis : an official publication of the Society for Risk Analysis.

[4]  E. Coppola,et al.  Lead distribution as related to pedological features of soils in the Volturno River low Basin (Campania, Italy). , 2010 .

[5]  Michael V. Ruby,et al.  Estimation of lead and arsenic bioavailability using a physiologically based extraction test , 1996 .

[6]  G. P. Patil,et al.  Identification of the largest individual sample value using composite sample data and certain modifications of the sweep-out method , 2004, Environmental and Ecological Statistics.

[7]  M. McBride,et al.  Chemical Extractability of Lead in Field-Contaminated Soils: Implications for Estimating Total Lead , 2011, Communications in soil science and plant analysis.

[8]  C. K. Hsiao,et al.  Estimating the second-stage sample size and the most probable number of hot spots from a first-stage sample of heavy-metal contaminated soil , 2000 .

[9]  John Gallagher.  Reimagining Detroit: Opportunities for Redefining an American City , 2010 .

[10]  M. Chouteau,et al.  Geophysical characterization of contaminated urban fills , 2010 .

[11]  M. Laidlaw,et al.  The Elephant in the Playground: Confronting Lead-Contaminated Soils as an Important Source of Lead Burdens to Urban Populations , 2010, Perspectives in biology and medicine.

[12]  R. E. Guzman,et al.  Bioavailability of lead to juvenile swine dosed with soil from the Smuggler Mountain NPL Site of Aspen, Colorado. , 1997, Fundamental and applied toxicology : official journal of the Society of Toxicology.

[13]  W. Brattin,et al.  An In Vitro Procedure for Estimation of Lead Relative Bioavailability: With Validation , 2007 .

[14]  Gary L Diamond,et al.  Application of Geostatistics to Risk Assessment , 2003, Risk analysis : an official publication of the Society for Risk Analysis.

[15]  E. Calabrese,et al.  Meta‐Analysis of Mass‐Balance Studies of Soil Ingestion in Children , 2012, Risk analysis : an official publication of the Society for Risk Analysis.

[16]  D. J. Brus,et al.  Sampling for Natural Resource Monitoring , 2006 .

[17]  H. Mielke,et al.  Soil is an important pathway of human lead exposure. , 1998, Environmental health perspectives.

[18]  Michael Edward Hohn,et al.  An Introduction to Applied Geostatistics: by Edward H. Isaaks and R. Mohan Srivastava, 1989, Oxford University Press, New York, 561 p., ISBN 0-19-505012-6, ISBN 0-19-505013-4 (paperback), $55.00 cloth, $35.00 paper (US) , 1991 .

[19]  Michael V. Ruby,et al.  Advances in evaluating the oral bioavailability of inorganics in soil for use in human health risk assessment , 1999 .

[20]  Timothy C. Coburn,et al.  Geostatistics for Natural Resources Evaluation , 2000, Technometrics.

[21]  J. Graziano,et al.  Bioavailability of soilborne lead in adults, by stable isotope dilution. , 1998, Environmental health perspectives.

[22]  D. Brabander,et al.  Urban gardens: lead exposure, recontamination mechanisms, and implications for remediation design. , 2008, Environmental research.

[23]  K. Hogan,et al.  The conceptual structure of the integrated exposure uptake biokinetic model for lead in children. , 1998, Environmental health perspectives.

[24]  D. B. Kleja,et al.  Modelling lead(II) sorption to ferrihydrite and soil organic matter , 2011 .

[25]  Clayton V. Deutsch,et al.  GSLIB: Geostatistical Software Library and User's Guide , 1993 .

[26]  D. Paustenbach,et al.  The Critical Role of House Dust in Understanding the Hazards Posed by Contaminated Soils , 1997 .

[27]  R L Bornschein,et al.  Evolution of efficient methods to sample lead sources, such as house dust and hand dust, in the homes of children. , 1985, Environmental research.

[28]  D. Brabander,et al.  Sources, sinks, and exposure pathways of lead in urban garden soil. , 2006, Journal of environmental quality.