Patient Experiences, Trust, and Preferences for Health Data Sharing

PURPOSE Scholars have examined patients' attitudes toward secondary use of routinely collected clinical data for research and quality improvement. Evidence suggests that trust in health care organizations and physicians is critical. Less is known about experiences that shape trust and how they influence data sharing preferences. MATERIALS AND METHODS To explore learning health care system (LHS) ethics, democratic deliberations were hosted from June 2017 to May 2018. A total of 217 patients with cancer participated in facilitated group discussion. Transcripts were coded independently. Finalized codes were organized into themes using interpretive description and thematic analysis. Two previous analyses reported on patient preferences for consent and data use; this final analysis focuses on the influence of personal lived experiences of the health care system, including interactions with providers and insurers, on trust and preferences for data sharing. RESULTS Qualitative analysis identified four domains of patients' lived experiences raised in the context of the policy discussions: (1) the quality of care received, (2) the impact of health care costs, (3) the transparency and communication displayed by a provider or an insurer to the patient, and (4) the extent to which care coordination was hindered or facilitated by the interchange between a provider and an insurer. Patients discussed their trust in health care decision makers and their opinions about LHS data sharing. CONCLUSION Additional resources, infrastructure, regulations, and practice innovations are needed to improve patients' experiences with and trust in the health care system. Those who seek to build LHSs may also need to consider improvement in other aspects of care delivery.

[1]  Leah F Binder,et al.  Rebuilding Trust and Relationships in Medical Centers: A Focus on Health Care Affordability. , 2020, JAMA.

[2]  C. Braddock,et al.  Transparency as a Trust-Building Practice in Physician Relationships With Patients. , 2020, JAMA.

[3]  Dorothy Y. Hung,et al.  Learning Health System in Crisis: Lessons From the COVID-19 Pandemic , 2020, Mayo Clinic Proceedings: Innovations, Quality & Outcomes.

[4]  P. Butow,et al.  A systematic literature review of health consumer attitudes towards secondary use and sharing of health administrative and clinical trial data: a focus on privacy, trust, and transparency , 2020, Systematic Reviews.

[5]  Patient trust must come at the top of researchers’ priority list , 2020, Nature Medicine.

[6]  Kathleen B. Cartmell,et al.  Patient barriers to cancer clinical trial participation and navigator activities to assist. , 2020, Advances in cancer research.

[7]  R. Wachter,et al.  Sharing Health Care Data With Digital Giants: Overcoming Obstacles and Reaping Benefits While Protecting Patients. , 2020, JAMA.

[8]  E. Emanuel,et al.  Sharing Patient Data Without Exploiting Patients. , 2020, JAMA.

[9]  I. Cohen,et al.  Big Data, Big Tech, and Protecting Patient Privacy. , 2019, JAMA.

[10]  E. McGlynn,et al.  A Framework for Increasing Trust Between Patients and the Organizations That Care for Them , 2019, JAMA.

[11]  Nancy E. Kass,et al.  Ethics and Learning Health Care: The Essential roles of engagement, transparency, and accountability , 2018, Learning health systems.

[12]  Mandi L. Pratt-Chapman,et al.  In their own words: patient navigator roles in culturally sensitive cancer care , 2018, Supportive Care in Cancer.

[13]  Marc S. Williams,et al.  Patient-Centered Precision Health In A Learning Health Care System: Geisinger's Genomic Medicine Experience. , 2018, Health affairs.

[14]  A. Andermann.  Taking action on the social determinants of health in clinical practice: a framework for health professionals , 2016, Canadian Medical Association Journal.

[15]  B. Carr,et al.  Uniting Big Health Data for a National Learning Health System in the United States. , 2016, JAMA pediatrics.

[16]  Mhairi Aitken,et al.  Public responses to the sharing and linkage of health data for research purposes: a systematic review and thematic synthesis of qualitative studies , 2016, BMC medical ethics.

[17]  David R. Williams,et al.  Evaluating Strategies For Reducing Health Disparities By Addressing The Social Determinants Of Health. , 2016, Health affairs.

[18]  Mildred K Cho,et al.  Adrift in the gray zone: IRB perspectives on research in the learning health system , 2016, AJOB empirical bioethics.

[19]  R. D. de Vries,et al.  Assessing the Public's Views in Research Ethics Controversies: Deliberative Democracy and Bioethics as Natural Allies , 2009, Journal of empirical research on human research ethics : JERHRE.

[20]  V. Braun,et al.  Using thematic analysis in psychology , 2006 .

[21]  S. Thorne,et al.  The Analytic Challenge in Interpretive Description , 2004 .

[22]  Steven N Goodman,et al.  An ethics framework for a learning health care system: a departure from traditional research ethics and clinical ethics. , 2013, The Hastings Center report.