The Adoption of Electronic Medical Records in Family Practice : The Providers ’ Perspective

BACKGROUND AND OBJECTIVES The study's objectives were to explore Deliver Primary Healthcare Information (DELPHI) project participants' experiences, ideas, and perspectives regarding the adoption of electronic medical records (EMRs) into their primary health care practices and to examine perceived barriers and facilitators to EMR adoption. METHODS This study explored the experiences of the 30 participants in the project. Semi-structured interviews were conducted. The analysis was both iterative and interpretive. RESULTS Two key themes emerged: (1) barriers (ie, level of computer literacy, training required, and time) and facilitators (ie, having an in-house problem solver and the EMR's integrated messaging system), and (2) a continuum of EMR adoption (ie, levels of knowledge ranging from novice to advanced and responses to the EMR that included participants' reflections on their personal journey across the adoption continuum and that of their practice sites). CONCLUSIONS It is important to be aware of and responsive to factors that can influence EMR implementation and adoption. They include paying attention to computer literacy; setting aside dedicated time for EMR implementation and adoption, as well as engaging in training activities; and supporting problem-solvers in the practice. Mechanisms should be put into place to promote the movement of practices across the continuum of EMR adoption.

[1]  L. Petersen,et al.  Barriers to proliferation of electronic medical records. , 2004, Informatics in primary care.

[2]  G. A. Loomis,et al.  If electronic medical records are so great, why aren't family physicians using them? , 2002, The Journal of family practice.

[3]  C. K. Barsukiewicz,et al.  Electronic medical records: are physicians ready? , 1999, Journal of healthcare management / American College of Healthcare Executives.

[4]  M. Sandelowski.  Focus on Research Methods Whatever Happened to Qualitative Description? , 2022 .

[5]  Ida Sim,et al.  Electronic Medical Records: Lessons from Small Physician Practices , 2003 .

[6]  C. Schoen,et al.  On the front lines of care: primary care doctors' office systems, experiences, and views in seven countries. , 2006, Health affairs.

[7]  B. Gamble.  Barriers to Implementation of Clinical Systems , 2003 .

[8]  D. Gans,et al.  Medical groups' adoption of electronic health records and information systems. , 2005, Health affairs.

[9]  C W JEANES,et al.  The royal college of physicians and surgeons of Canada , 1964, Canadian Medical Association journal.

[10]  P. Leatt,et al.  IT solutions for patient safety--best practices for successful implementation in healthcare. , 2006, Healthcare quarterly.

[11]  B. Crabtree,et al.  Doing Qualitative Research , 1999 .

[12]  Paul D. Smith,et al.  Implementing an EMR system: one clinic's experience. , 2003, Family practice management.

[13]  I. Sim,et al.  Physicians' use of electronic medical records: barriers and solutions. , 2004, Health affairs.

[14]  Arie Hasman,et al.  Development and implementation of an EPR: how to encourage the user , 2001, Int. J. Medical Informatics.

[15]  Steven R. Simon,et al.  Correlates of Electronic Health Record Adoption in Office Practices: A Statewide Survey , 2006, AMIA.

[16]  Melanie Studer,et al.  The effect of organizational factors on the effectiveness of EMR system implementation--what have we learned? , 2005, Healthcare quarterly.

[17]  Rainu Kaushal,et al.  Electronic health records: which practices have them, and how are clinicians using them? , 2008, Journal of evaluation in clinical practice.

[18]  J. Aaronson,et al.  Electronic medical records: the family practice resident perspective. , 2001, Family medicine.

[19]  N. Britten,et al.  Using Reflexivity to Optimize Teamwork in Qualitative Research , 1999, Qualitative health research.