Resilience Framework for Ports and Other Intermodal Components

Intermodal (IM) freight systems and their components play a significant role in the U.S. and world economies. Terminals and ports are critical components of these systems. These components however, are, by the nature of their design inherently vulnerable to natural and terrorist attack, and evidence is mounting that an attack on or involving the IM freight transport system and its components would have catastrophic consequences. Significant effort has been expended on the development of technologies and other measures that can aid in addressing these security needs at ports in the United States and abroad. A quantitative measure, termed resilience, is employed to determine the best set of actions to improve security at nodal facilities in an IM network. Resilience accounts for both the innate reliability of a facility and the ability of short-term recovery actions to mitigate negative effects. This concept has been employed at the system level. A framework for its application at the IM component level is proposed. A case-based analysis is conducted to produce the specific steps required to apply this concept to an existing port. The framework is general and can be applied to any IM nodal component, such as terminals, marshalling yards, and border control stations. The resulting ability to quantify the component's level of vulnerability will aid decision makers in assessing trade-offs between investment and costly security implementations.

[1]  A Chatterjee SECURITY ISSUES INVOLVING INTERMODAL FREIGHT TRANSPORTATION AND TERMINALS , 2002 .

[2]  Michael G.H. Bell,et al.  Transportation Network Analysis: Bell/Transportation Network Analysis , 1997 .

[3]  Jean-Luc Gaudiot,et al.  Network Resilience: A Measure of Network Fault Tolerance , 1990, IEEE Trans. Computers.

[4]  Stefan Voß,et al.  Container terminal operation and operations research - a classification and literature review , 2004, OR Spectr..

[5]  Y Iida,et al.  Transportation Network Analysis , 1997 .

[6]  Elise Miller-Hooks,et al.  Market Potential for International Rail-Based Intermodal Services in Europe , 2008 .

[7]  Kelly Pitera,et al.  Structuring a Definition of Resilience for the Freight Transportation System , 2009 .

[8]  Elise Miller-Hooks,et al.  Resilience: An Indicator of Recovery Capability in Intermodal Freight Transport , 2012, Transp. Sci..

[9]  Jayetta Z. Hecker,et al.  Port Security: Nation Faces Formidable Challenges in Making New Initiatives Successful , 2002 .

[10]  G. Liedtke,et al.  Segmentation of the transportation market with regard to activity-based freight transport modelling , 2004 .

[11]  H Yang,et al.  RELIABILITY OF TRANSPORT NETWORKS. CHAPTER 9. TRAVEL TIME VERSUS CAPACITY RELIABILITY OF A ROAD NETWORK , 2001 .

[12]  P. H. Walker,et al.  Handbook of Disaster Research. , 2008 .

[13]  Yasunori Iida,et al.  BASIC CONCEPTS AND FUTURE DIRECTIONS OF ROAD NETWORK RELIABILITY ANALYSIS , 1999 .

[14]  Eric C. Jackson,et al.  North American Container Port Capacity: A Literature Review , 2005 .

[15]  Sally Cairns,et al.  Evidence on the effects of road capacity reduction on traffic levels , 1998 .

[16]  Kalyan Kumar Srinivasan TRANSPORTATION NETWORK VULNERABILITY ASSESSMENT: A QUANTITATIVE FRAMEWORK , 2002 .

[17]  Hong Kam Lo,et al.  Capacity reliability of a road network: an assessment methodology and numerical results , 2002 .

[18]  Pamela M. Murray-Tuite A Comparison of Transportation Network Resilience under Simulated System Optimum and User Equilibrium Conditions , 2006, Proceedings of the 2006 Winter Simulation Conference.

[19]  Brian L. Smith,et al.  Characterization of accident capacity reduction , 2001 .

[20]  James H. Clifford,et al.  Protecting the American Homeland: A Preliminary Analysis , 2003 .