Tenure in Redd: Start-Point or Afterthought?

As new mechanisms for ‘reducing emissions from deforestation and forest degradation’ (REDD) are being negotiated in international climate change talks, resource tenure must be given greater attention. Tenure over land and trees – the systems of rights, rules, institutions and processes regulating their access and use – will affect the extent to which REDD and related strategies will benefit, or marginalise, forest communities. This report aims to promote debate on the issue. Drawing on experience from seven rainforest countries (Brazil, Cameroon, Democratic Republic of Congo, Guyana, Indonesia, Malaysia and Papua New Guinea), the report develops a typology of tenure regimes across countries, explores tenure issues in each country, and identifies key challenges to be addressed if REDD is to have equitable and sustainable impact.

[1]  Forest Certification in Malaysia , 2006 .

[2]  Imasiku Nyambe,et al.  Creating and protecting Zambia's wealth: experience and next steps in environmental mainstreaming. , 2009 .

[3]  Chetan Agarwal,et al.  Fair deals for watershed services in India. , 2007 .

[4]  Russell Wise,et al.  Fair deals for watershed services in South Africa , 2008 .

[5]  A. White,et al.  Who owns the world's forests? Forest tenure and public forests in transition. , 2002 .

[6]  N. Nakicenovic,et al.  Climate change 2007: Mitigation. Contribution of Working Group III to the Fourth Assessment Report of the Intergovernmental Panel on Climate Change. Summary for Policymakers. , 2007 .

[7]  G. Koczberski,et al.  Improving Productivity of the Smallholder Oil Palm Sector in Papua New Guinea: A Socio-economic Study of the Hoskins and Popondetta Schemes , 2001 .

[8]  Sarah McIntosh,et al.  Fair deals for watershed services in the Caribbean , 2007 .

[9]  J. McCarthy,et al.  Decentralization of forest administration in Indonesia: implications for forest sustainability, economic development and community livelihoods , 2006 .

[10]  Dilys Roe,et al.  Local action, global aspirations: the role of community conservation in achieving international goals for environment and development. , 2006 .

[11]  L. Cotula Changes in "customary" land tenure systems in Africa , 2007 .

[12]  R. Bulan Native Customary Land: The Trust As a Device For Land Development in Sarawak , 2006 .

[13]  N. Asquith,et al.  Fair Deals for Watershed Services in Bolivia , 2007 .

[14]  A. Mitchell,et al.  The little REDD book: a guide to governmental and non-governmental proposals for reducing emissions from deforestation and degradation. , 2008 .

[15]  D. Lea Customary land tenure in Papua New Guinea: what does it really mean? , 2004 .

[16]  F. Romano Forest tenure changes in Africa: making locally based forest management work , 2007 .

[17]  L. Peskett,et al.  Risk and responsibility in Reduced Emissions from Deforestation and Degradation , 2007 .

[18]  I. Bond,et al.  Fair deals for watershed services: lessons from a multi-country action-learning project. , 2010 .

[19]  Munawir,et al.  Fair deals for watershed services in Indonesia , 2007 .

[20]  W. Sunderlin,et al.  From Exclusion to Ownership?: Challenges and Opportunities in Advancing Forest Tenure Reform , 2008 .

[21]  D. Macqueen Supporting small forest enterprises: a cross-sectoral review of best practice. , 2008 .

[22]  M. Colchester,et al.  Promised land : palm oil and land acquisition in Indonesia : implications for local communities and indigenous peoples , 2006 .

[23]  J. Bulkan,et al.  BREAKING THE RINGS OF FOREST CORRUPTION: STEPS TOWARDS BETTER FOREST GOVERNANCE , 2008 .

[24]  S. Vermeulen,et al.  Towards better practice in smallholder palm oil production. , 2006 .

[25]  S. Vermeulen,et al.  Company-community forestry partnerships: from raw deals to mutual gains? , 2002 .

[26]  Ina Porras,et al.  All That Glitters: A Review of Payments for Watershed Services in Developing Countries , 2009 .

[27]  S. Hirakuri Can Law Save the Forest?: Lessons from Finland and Brazil , 2003 .

[28]  Benjamin Cashore,et al.  Confronting Sustainability: Forest Certification in Developing and Transitioning Countries , 2006 .

[29]  Klaus Deininger,et al.  Land policies for growth and poverty reduction , 2003 .

[30]  S. Vermeulen,et al.  Integrating global and local values: a review of biodiversity assessment. , 2002 .

[31]  P. Sellers,et al.  Expected Failures and Unexpected Successes of Land Titling in Africa , 1999 .

[32]  Nicola Baird,et al.  Losing ground : the human rights impacts of oil palm plantation expansion in Indonesia , 2008 .

[33]  R. Mendelsohn Property Rights and Tropical Deforestation , 1994 .

[34]  J. Mayers,et al.  Forest Governance and Social Justice: Practical Tactics from a Learning Group Approach in Africa , 2006 .

[35]  D. Kaimowitz,et al.  The Prospects for Reduced Emissions from Deforestation and Degradation (REDD) in Mesoamerica , 2008 .

[36]  S. Vosti,et al.  Brazil. Forests in the balance: challenges of conservation with development. , 2000 .

[37]  C. E. Young,et al.  The Brazilian tropical timber industry and international markets , 2003 .