Examining cyberbullying across the lifespan

Understanding the variables and processes that predict cyberbullying perpetration has become important to developing theory and contributing to intervention. One recent cyberbullying model that has received recent support is the Barlett and Gentile (2012) model. Briefly, this model applies broader learning theory to predict that anonymity and the lack of concern about strength differential predict cyberbullying behavior through the development of positive attitudes towards cyberbullying. To test these learning postulates, the current study had 167 youth (average age=13.76) and 552 adults (average age=36.20) complete measures of cyberbullying behavior, cyberbullying attitudes, anonymity, belief in the non-importance of physical strength online, and time spent online. Results showed that the relation between age and the aforementioned variables was quadratic (rather than linear), such that cyberbullying increased from youth to emerging adulthood and then decreased. Examined participant's age on cyberbullying.Participants aged between 11 and 75 years completed questionnaires.Results showed age correlated with cyberbullying.Results showed age moderated cyberbullying relations.Overall, age is theoretically related to cyberbullying processes.

[1]  Robert S. Tokunaga,et al.  Following you home from school: A critical review and synthesis of research on cyberbullying victimization , 2010, Comput. Hum. Behav..

[2]  F. Mishna,et al.  Risk Factors for involvement in cyber bullying: Victims, bullies, and bully-victims , 2012 .

[3]  Christopher P. Barlett,et al.  Examining the Relation Between Parental Ignorance and Youths’ Cyberbullying Perpetration , 2018, Psychology of Popular Media Culture.

[4]  B. Peshkin,et al.  Interest in genetic counseling and testing for adolescent nicotine addiction susceptibility among a sample of adolescent medicine providers attending a scientific conference on adolescent health. , 2007, The Journal of adolescent health : official publication of the Society for Adolescent Medicine.

[5]  D. Goh,et al.  Cyberbullying Among Adolescents: The Role of Affective and Cognitive Empathy, and Gender , 2010, Child psychiatry and human development.

[6]  V. Venkatesh,et al.  AGE DIFFERENCES IN TECHNOLOGY ADOPTION DECISIONS: IMPLICATIONS FOR A CHANGING WORK FORCE , 2000 .

[7]  Douglas A. Gentile,et al.  An Empirical Examination of the Strength Differential Hypothesis in Cyberbullying Behavior , 2017 .

[8]  Christopher P. Barlett Anonymously hurting others online: The effect of anonymity on cyberbullying frequency. , 2015 .

[9]  Viswanath Venkatesh,et al.  Consumer Acceptance and Use of Information Technology: Extending the Unified Theory of Acceptance and Use of Technology , 2012, MIS Q..

[10]  A. Lenhart Teens, Social Media & Technology Overview 2015 , 2015 .

[11]  Douglas A. Gentile,et al.  Attacking others online: The formation of cyberbullying in late adolescence. , 2012 .

[12]  J. P. Shalloo Crime in the United States , 1974 .

[13]  B. Roberts,et al.  Patterns of mean-level change in personality traits across the life course: a meta-analysis of longitudinal studies. , 2006, Psychological bulletin.

[14]  Christopher P. Barlett,et al.  Predicting Cyberbullying From Anonymity. , 2014 .

[15]  Anna Ševc Online Harassment and Cyberbullying in the Czech Republic Comparison Across Age Groups , 2009 .

[16]  J. Stockman Electronic Bullying Among Middle School Students , 2009 .

[17]  E. Menesini,et al.  Cyberbullying definition and measurement: Some critical considerations , 2009 .

[18]  Michele L. Ybarra,et al.  Examining the overlap in internet harassment and school bullying: implications for school intervention. , 2007, The Journal of adolescent health : official publication of the Society for Adolescent Medicine.

[19]  Robin M. Kowalski,et al.  Bullying in the digital age: a critical review and meta-analysis of cyberbullying research among youth. , 2014, Psychological bulletin.

[20]  Uniform Crime Reporting https ucr.fbi.gov Crime in the United States, 2016 , 2016 .

[21]  C. Anderson,et al.  Research Methods, Design, and Statistics in Media Psychology , 2012 .

[22]  Yoon Hyung Choi,et al.  Age Differences in Online Social Networking: Extending Socioemotional Selectivity Theory to Social Network Sites , 2015, Journal of broadcasting & electronic media.