Zero frequency masking and a model of contrast sensitivity

Stimulating the visual system tends to desensitize it to certain stimulus properties. Such desensitization is usually called adaptation or masking, but the distinction between the two is unclear. Nonspecific desensitization by light is usually regarded as adaptation, whereas pattern-specific desensitization is typically considered masking. Here we unify the treatment of such desensitizing phenomena by handling both in the spatial frequency domain. The amount of adapting light in a stimulus is represented in the spatial frequency domain by the component at zero frequency. To determine whether such adapting light acts like other components in the spatial frequency domain, we compared the effect of masking by the zero frequency component with the effects of masking by components at other frequencies. We show that the zero frequency component acts like other masking components, decreasing sensitivity to nearby test frequencies and thereby producing the insensitivity to low spatial frequencies that gives the contrast sensitivity curve its band-pass shape at high light levels. Treating light adaptation as masking by the zero frequency component leads to a general model that describes visual sensitivity to test gratings of varying spatial frequency at varying mean luminance, in the presence (or absence) of masking gratings of varying spatial frequency. Individual components of the model provide insight into visual processing at the system level.

[1]  J. Rovamo,et al.  Modelling contrast sensitivity as a function of retinal illuminance and grating area , 1994, Vision Research.

[2]  J. M. Foley,et al.  Human luminance pattern-vision mechanisms: masking experiments require a new model. , 1994, Journal of the Optical Society of America. A, Optics, image science, and vision.

[3]  G Buchsbaum,et al.  Global spatiochromatic mechanism accounting for luminance variations in contrast sensitivity functions. , 1989, Journal of the Optical Society of America. A, Optics and image science.

[4]  Colin Blakemore,et al.  Vision: Coding and Efficiency , 1991 .

[5]  P. Lennie,et al.  Spatial frequency analysis in the visual system. , 1985, Annual review of neuroscience.

[6]  H B BARLOW,et al.  Increment thresholds at low intensities considered as signal/noise discriminations , 1957, The Journal of physiology.

[7]  J. Kulikowski,et al.  Effective contrast constancy and linearity of contrast sensation , 1976, Vision Research.

[8]  D. Pelli.  The quantum efficiency of vision , 1990 .

[9]  F. Campbell,et al.  The effect of orientation on the visual resolution of gratings , 1966, The Journal of physiology.

[10]  S. Klein,et al.  Hyperacuity thresholds of 1 sec: theoretical predictions and empirical validation. , 1985, Journal of the Optical Society of America. A, Optics and image science.

[11]  A. Rose.  The sensitivity performance of the human eye on an absolute scale. , 1948, Journal of the Optical Society of America.

[12]  J. McCann,et al.  Visibility of low-spatial-frequency sine-wave targets: Dependence on number of cycles. , 1975, Journal of the Optical Society of America.

[13]  H. Wilson,et al.  Spatial frequency tuning of orientation selective units estimated by oblique masking , 1983, Vision Research.

[14]  Hugh R. Wilson,et al.  10 – THE PERCEPTION OF FORM: Retina to Striate Cortex , 1989 .

[15]  J. Kulikowski,et al.  Some stimulus parameters affecting spatial and temporal resolution of human vision. , 1971, Vision research.

[16]  R. F. Hess,et al.  Temporal properties of human visual filters: number, shapes and spatial covariation , 1992, Vision Research.

[17]  Light capture by human cones. , 1989, The Journal of physiology.

[18]  N. Graham.  Spatial frequency channels in the human visual system: effects of luminance and pattern drift rate. , 1972, Vision research.

[19]  G. Legge.  Spatial frequency masking in human vision: binocular interactions. , 1979, Journal of the Optical Society of America.

[20]  R. Hess,et al.  The functional area for summation to threshold for sinusoidal gratings , 1978, Vision Research.

[21]  Mary M. Hayhoe,et al.  The spread of adaptation in human foveal and parafoveal cone vision , 1990, Vision Research.

[22]  D. Brainard,et al.  Efficiency in detection of isoluminant and isochromatic interference fringes. , 1993, Journal of the Optical Society of America. A, Optics, image science, and vision.

[23]  J M Foley,et al.  Forward pattern masking: effects of spatial frequency and contrast. , 1991, Journal of the Optical Society of America. A, Optics and image science.

[24]  H. Barlow.  Retinal noise and absolute threshold. , 1956, Journal of the Optical Society of America.

[25]  C. Enroth-Cugell,et al.  Spatio‐temporal interactions in cat retinal ganglion cells showing linear spatial summation. , 1983, The Journal of physiology.

[26]  H. Barlow.  Temporal and spatial summation in human vision at different background intensities , 1958, The Journal of physiology.

[27]  M. A. Bouman,et al.  Spatial Modulation Transfer in the Human Eye , 1967 .

[28]  L. Kaufman,et al.  Handbook of perception and human performance , 1986 .

[29]  Jyrki Rovamo,et al.  Modelling the dependence of contrast sensitivity on grating area and spatial frequency , 1993, Vision Research.

[30]  F A Bilsen,et al.  The influence of the number of cycles upon the visual contrast threshold for spatial sine wave patterns. , 1974, Vision research.

[31]  P. Whittle,et al.  Luminance discrimination of separated flashes: the effect of background luminance and the shapes of T.V.I. curves. , 1974, Vision research.

[32]  A. Watson,et al.  Quest: A Bayesian adaptive psychometric method , 1983, Perception & psychophysics.

[33]  J. Robson,et al.  Probability summation and regional variation in contrast sensitivity across the visual field , 1981, Vision Research.

[34]  P. O. Bishop,et al.  Spatial vision. , 1971, Annual review of psychology.

[35]  Wilson S. Geisler,et al.  The physical limits of grating visibility , 1987, Vision Research.

[36]  J. M. Foley,et al.  Contrast masking in human vision. , 1980, Journal of the Optical Society of America.

[37]  P. Lennie,et al.  The influence of temporal frequency and adaptation level on receptive field organization of retinal ganglion cells in cat , 1982, The Journal of physiology.

[38]  H. Vries.  The quantum character of light and its bearing upon threshold of vision, the differential sensitivity and visual acuity of the eye , 1943 .

[39]  C. F. Stromeyer,et al.  Low spatial-frequency channels in human vision: Adaptation and masking , 1982, Vision Research.

[40]  Walter Makous,et al.  Spatiotemporal separability in contrast sensitivity , 1994, Vision Research.

[41]  D. H. Kelly.  Adaptation effects on spatio-temporal sine-wave thresholds. , 1972, Vision research.

[42]  J. Robson.  Spatial and Temporal Contrast-Sensitivity Functions of the Visual System , 1966 .

[43]  D. H. Kelly.  Spatial frequency selectivity in the retina , 1975, Vision Research.

[44]  J. Ross,et al.  Contrast adaptation and contrast masking in human vision , 1991, Proceedings of the Royal Society of London. Series B: Biological Sciences.

[45]  R. L. de Valois,et al.  Psychophysical studies of monkey vision. 3. Spatial luminance contrast sensitivity tests of macaque and human observers. , 1974, Vision research.

[46]  David C. Burr,et al.  Local regulation of luminance gain , 1985, Vision Research.

[47]  L. Spillmann,et al.  Visual Perception: The Neurophysiological Foundations , 1989 .

[48]  J R Bartlett,et al.  Luxotonic responses of units in macaque striate cortex. , 1979, Journal of neurophysiology.

[49]  C. R. Cavonius,et al.  Low-frequency attenuation in the detection of gratings: Sorting out the artefacts , 1976, Vision Research.

[50]  W. Makous,et al.  Modeling pedestal experiments with amplitude instead of contrast , 1995, Vision Research.

[51]  F. Campbell,et al.  Optical quality of the human eye , 1966, The Journal of physiology.