Multivariate morphological characteristics and classification of first-order basins in the Siwaliks, Nepal

Abstract This study identifies and analyzes a group of interrelated morphometric variables that contribute to the morphology of first-order basins in the Siwaliks and the adjacent part of the Lesser Himalaya in the Far West Nepal. First-order basins were identified and their various morphometric indices (21 variables) such as shape, area, pattern, roughness, height, gradient, angle, and distance were obtained from topographic maps (scale 1:25,000) and a digital elevation model using a geographic information system. The study also identifies the basin types based on morphometric properties and assesses their association with lithology, structure, and uplift rates. A principal component analysis identified seven major components that accounted for 78% of the total variance explained by the original 21 morphometric variables. Variables' loading reveals that the components are the expressions of slope, size, valley/depression, basin shape, relative massiveness, the convergence index, and basin asymmetry. Of these, slope and size components explain 48% of the total variance. The sets of variables represented by each major component for the entire study area were mostly common to all lithostratigraphic units. Some variables such as drainage density, junction angle, and the sediment transport index have associations with more than one group. This implies that complex geomorphic processes are involved in the development of basin morphology. Using the seven major components, five basin types were recognized by cluster analysis. The distributions of these basin types are similar in the Lower and Middle Siwaliks which have similar geological structures. The geometric relationship between the dip and the topography of a homoclinal structure significantly affects the proportion of basin types, as evidenced by the contrasting proportions between the cuesta and hogback and among dip, anti-dip and orthoclinal slopes. Correlation analysis also confirmed the effect of structure (dipping) on the morphometric variables, and indicated the influence of uplift rates on basin slope, stream slope, elevation range, mean elevation, valley angle, the shape index and the convergence index associated with the active thrust.

[1]  D. Schelling,et al.  Thrust tectonics, crustal shortening, and the structure of the far-eastern Nepal Himalaya , 1991 .

[2]  A. Gansser.  Geology of the Himalayas , 1964 .

[3]  P. Burrough,et al.  Principles of geographical information systems , 1998 .

[4]  Takashi Oguchi,et al.  Drainage Density and Relative Relief in Humid Steep Mountains with Frequent Slope Failure , 1997 .

[5]  V. C. Miller,et al.  quantitative geomorphic study of drainage basin characteristics in the Clinch Mountain area, Virginia and Tennessee , 1953 .

[6]  R. Sidle,et al.  Understanding Processes and Downstream Linkages of Headwater Systems , 2002 .

[7]  D. Cruden.  Some forms of mountain peaks in the Canadian Rockies controlled by their rock structure , 2000 .

[8]  J. Malik,et al.  Active tectonic influence on the evolution of drainage and landscape: Geomorphic signatures from frontal and hinterland areas along the Northwestern Himalaya, India , 2007 .

[9]  B. N. Upreti,et al.  Neogene foreland basin deposits, erosional unroofing, and the kinematic history of the Himalayan fold-thrust belt, western Nepal , 1998 .

[10]  Jean-Michel Carozza,et al.  Recent fold growth and drainage development: The Janauri and Chandigarh anticlines in the Siwalik foothills, northwest India , 2006 .

[11]  V. Gardiner.  Redundancy and spatial organization of drainage basin form indices: an empirical investigation of data from north-west , 1978 .

[12]  K. Beven,et al.  THE PREDICTION OF HILLSLOPE FLOW PATHS FOR DISTRIBUTED HYDROLOGICAL MODELLING USING DIGITAL TERRAIN MODELS , 1991 .

[13]  A. N. Strahler.  Hypsometric (area-altitude) analysis of erosional topography. , 1952 .

[14]  P. E. Potter,et al.  A Quantitative Geomorphic Study of Drainage Basin Characteristics in the Clinch Mountain Area, Virginia and Tennessee. V. C. Miller , 1957 .

[15]  T. Hengl,et al.  Geomorphometry: Concepts, software, applications , 2009 .

[16]  A. Goudie,et al.  Geomorphology in Arid Regions , 1980 .

[17]  J. Mugnier,et al.  Episodicity and Rates of Thrust-sheet Motion in the Himalayas (Western Nepal) , 2004 .

[18]  Jerry E. Mueller.  AN INTRODUCTION TO THE HYDRAULIC AND TOPOGRAPHIC SINUOSITY INDEXES1 , 1968 .

[19]  S. Schumm.  EVOLUTION OF DRAINAGE SYSTEMS AND SLOPES IN BADLANDS AT PERTH AMBOY, NEW JERSEY , 1956 .

[20]  Gary A. Peterson,et al.  Soil Attribute Prediction Using Terrain Analysis , 1993 .

[21]  J. Avouac,et al.  Investigation of the relationships between basin morphology, tectonic uplift, and denudation from the study of an active fold belt in the Siwalik Hills, central Nepal , 1999 .

[22]  Jerry R. Miller,et al.  Morphometric assessment of lithologic controls on drainage basin evolution in the Crawford Upland, south-central Indiana , 1990 .

[23]  J. T. Hack,et al.  Stream-profile analysis and stream-gradient index , 1973 .

[24]  R. L. Shreve,et al.  Stream Lengths and Basin Areas in Topologically Random Channel Networks , 1969, The Journal of Geology.

[25]  J. Suppe,et al.  Geometry and kinematics of fault-bend folding , 1983 .

[26]  Julio Garrote,et al.  Multi-stream order analyses in basin asymmetry: A tool to discriminate the influence of neotectonics in fluvial landscape development (Madrid Basin, Central Spain) , 2008 .

[27]  Michael Church,et al.  GEOMORPHOLOGY OF STEEPLAND HEADWATERS: THE TRANSITION FROM HILLSLOPES TO CHANNELS 1 , 2005 .

[28]  Alan L. Marcus.  First-order drainage basin morphology—definition and distribution , 1980 .

[29]  R. Devi.  Geomorphic appraisals of active tectonics associated with uplift of the Gohpur Ganga section in Itanagar, Arunachal Pradesh, India , 2008 .

[30]  A. Parsons.  Slope profile variability in first-order drainage basins , 1982 .

[31]  J. Mugnier,et al.  Growth and lateral propagation of fault‐related folds in the Siwaliks of western Nepal: Rates, mechanisms, and geomorphic signature , 2002 .

[32]  D. Cruden,et al.  Structural control of the morphometry of open rock basins, Kananaskis region, Canadian Rocky Mountains , 1998 .

[33]  J. T. Hack,et al.  Geomorphology and forest ecology of a mountain region in the central Appalachians , 1960 .

[34]  Jérôme Lavé,et al.  Fluvial incision and tectonic uplift across the Himalayas of central Nepal , 2001 .

[35]  R. Cox.  Analysis of drainage-basin symmetry as a rapid technique to identify areas of possible Quaternary tilt-block tectonics: An example from the Mississippi Embayment , 1994 .

[36]  F. Lucazeau,et al.  Effect of drainage area on hypsometry from an analysis of small-scale drainage basins in the Siwalik Hills (Central Nepal) , 1999 .

[37]  J. Jenness.  Calculating landscape surface area from digital elevation models , 2004 .

[38]  K. Beven,et al.  A physically based, variable contributing area model of basin hydrology , 1979 .

[39]  Hiroo Ohmori,et al.  Changes in the hypsometric curve through mountain building resulting from concurrent tectonics and denudation , 1993 .

[40]  David R. Montgomery,et al.  A process-based model for colluvial soil depth and shallow landsliding using digital elevation data , 1995 .

[41]  T. Nakata,et al.  Active faults of the Himalaya of India and Nepal , 1989 .

[42]  R. Horton.  EROSIONAL DEVELOPMENT OF STREAMS AND THEIR DRAINAGE BASINS; HYDROPHYSICAL APPROACH TO QUANTITATIVE MORPHOLOGY , 1945 .

[43]  Jérôme Lavé,et al.  Active folding of fluvial terraces across the Siwaliks Hills, Himalayas of central Nepal , 2000 .

[44]  L. Husson,et al.  The Siwaliks of western Nepal I. Geometry and kinematics , 1999 .

[45]  W. Bull,et al.  Tectonic Geomorphology North and South of the Garlock Fault, California , 1977 .

[46]  J. A. Hartigan,et al.  A k-means clustering algorithm , 1979 .

[47]  F. S. Ebisemiju.  Spatial scale and drainage basin morphometric interaction , 1985 .

[48]  Dorothy J. Merritts,et al.  Geomorphic response of coastal streams to low, intermediate, and high rates of uplift, Medocino triple junction region, northern California , 1989 .