Paying a Price: Culture, Trust, and Negotiation Consequences

Three studies contrasting Indian and American negotiators tested hypotheses derived from theory proposing why there are cultural differences in trust and how cultural differences in trust influence negotiation strategy. Study 1 (a survey) documented that Indian negotiators trust their counterparts less than American negotiators. Study 2 (a negotiation simulation) linked American and Indian negotiators' self-reported trust and strategy to their insight and joint gains. Study 3 replicated and extended Study 2 using independently coded negotiation strategy data, allowing for stronger causal inference. Overall, the strategy associated with Indian negotiators' reluctance to extend interpersonal (as opposed to institutional) trust produced relatively poor outcomes. Our data support an expanded theoretical model of negotiation, linking culture to trust, strategies, and outcomes.

[1]  A. Banerjee,et al.  Marry for What? Caste and Mate Selection in Modern India , 2009 .

[2]  T. Fang,et al.  Chinese Business Negotiating Style , 1998 .

[3]  John K. Butler,et al.  Behaviors, Trust, and Goal Achievement in a Win-Win Negotiating Role Play , 1995 .

[4]  Dale E. Zand.  Trust and Managerial Problem Solving , 1972 .

[5]  Ch'en Chi-Shih,et al.  Foreign Trade Statistics , 1970 .

[6]  Jeff M. Bickerton,et al.  Getting to Yes: Negotiating Agreement without Giving in , 2002 .

[7]  John K. Butler.  Trust Expectations, Information Sharing, Climate of Trust, and Negotiation Effectiveness and Efficiency , 1999 .

[8]  T. Yamagishi,et al.  [Effects of direct and indirect exchange on trust of in-group members]. , 2007, Shinrigaku kenkyu : The Japanese journal of psychology.

[9]  J. R. Landis,et al.  The measurement of observer agreement for categorical data. , 1977, Biometrics.

[10]  D. Gentner,et al.  Avoiding Missed Opportunities in Managerial Life: Analogical Training More Powerful Than Individual Case Training , 2000 .

[11]  W. Galston.  Trust: The Social Virtues and the Creation of Prosperity , 1996 .

[12]  Philip L. Smith,et al.  Conflicting social motives in negotiating groups. , 2007, Journal of personality and social psychology.

[13]  L. Thompson,et al.  TACTICAL BEHAVIOR AND NEGOTIATION OUTCOMES , 1990 .

[14]  M. Kirton.  Adaptors and Innovators: A Description and Measure. , 1976 .

[15]  Daniel Druckman,et al.  Cultural Differences in Bargaining Behavior , 1976 .

[16]  Debajyoti Sinha,et al.  ROLE OF SOCIAL VALUES IN INDIAN ORGANIZATIONS , 1990 .

[17]  R. Walton,et al.  A Behavioral Theory of Labor Negotiations. , 1966 .

[18]  O. Branzei,et al.  Culture-contingent signs of trust in emergent relationships , 2007 .

[19]  Arthur P. Brief,et al.  Research in Organizational Behavior: An Annual Series of Analytical Essays and Critical Reviews , 2003 .

[20]  P. Bliese.  Within-group agreement, non-independence, and reliability: Implications for data aggregation and analysis. , 2000 .

[21]  Peter J. Carnevale,et al.  Effects of trust, aspiration, and gender on negotiation tactics. , 1980 .

[22]  Sonstiges.  Corruption Perceptions Index , 2011 .

[23]  Anthony S. Bryk,et al.  Hierarchical Linear Models: Applications and Data Analysis Methods , 1992 .

[24]  J. G. Miller,et al.  Perceptions of social responsibilities in India and in the United States: moral imperatives or personal decisions? , 1990, Journal of personality and social psychology.

[25]  Wendi L. Adair,et al.  The Negotiation Dance: Time, Culture, and Behavioral Sequences in Negotiation , 2005, Organ. Sci..

[26]  Motoki Watabe,et al.  Uncertainty, Trust, and Commitment Formation in the United States and Japan1 , 1998, American Journal of Sociology.

[27]  Coye Cheshire,et al.  Does Trust Beget Trustworthiness? Trust and Trustworthiness in Two Games and Two Cultures: A Research Note , 2006 .

[28]  L. Weingart,et al.  PHASES, TRANSITIONS AND INTERRUPTIONS: MODELING PROCESSES IN MULTI‐PARTY NEGOTIATIONS , 2003 .

[29]  William Hernández Requejo,et al.  Global Negotiation: The New Rules , 2008 .

[30]  Max H. Bazerman,et al.  Negotiation in Small Groups , 1989 .

[31]  L. Roberts,et al.  Structural Tightness and Social Conformity , 1979 .

[32]  R. Bennett,et al.  The impact of consideration of issues and motivational orientation on group negotiation process and outcome. , 1993 .

[33]  Lars-Göran Stenelo,et al.  Mediation in International Negotiations , 1972 .

[34]  Debra L. Shapiro,et al.  Breaking the Bonds of Reciprocity in Negotiations , 1998 .

[35]  D. Malhotra,et al.  The Effects of Contracts on Interpersonal Trust , 2002 .

[36]  J. Brett,et al.  Inter- and Intracultural Negotiation: U.S. and Japanese Negotiators , 1998 .

[37]  Christopher W. Allinson,et al.  Cross-national differences in cognitive style: implications for management , 2000 .

[38]  Steven E. Daniels,et al.  When Talk Is Not Cheap: Substantive Penance and Expressions of Intent in Rebuilding Cooperation , 2002, Organ. Sci..

[39]  M. Deutsch.  The Resolution of ConflictConstructive and Destructive Processes , 1974 .

[40]  R. Nisbett,et al.  Culture and systems of thought: holistic versus analytic cognition. , 2001, Psychological review.

[41]  Simone Moran,et al.  When performance goals deter performance: Transfer of skills in integrative negotiations , 2004 .

[42]  Philip L. Smith,et al.  Testing the relationships among negotiators’ motivational orientations, strategy choices, and outcomes , 2003 .

[43]  K. Newton,et al.  Predicting Cross-National Levels of Social Trust: Global Pattern or Nordic Exceptionalism? , 2005 .

[44]  T. Yamagishi,et al.  Trust and commitment in the United States and Japan , 1994 .

[45]  Rajesh Kumar,et al.  INSTITUTIONAL DYNAMICS AND THE NEGOTIATION PROCESS: COMPARING INDIA AND CHINA , 2004 .

[46]  C. Schriesheim.  Causal Analysis: Assumptions, Models, and Data , 1982 .

[47]  D. G. Pruitt,et al.  Development of integrative solutions in bilateral negotiation. , 1975 .

[48]  A. Gouldner.  THE NORM OF RECIPROCITY: A PRELIMINARY STATEMENT * , 1960 .

[49]  Roderick M. Kramer,et al.  Swift trust and temporary groups. , 1996 .

[50]  J. Parikh,et al.  Intuition: The New Frontier of Management , 1994 .

[51]  Brent A. Scott,et al.  Trust, trustworthiness, and trust propensity: a meta-analytic test of their unique relationships with risk taking and job performance. , 2007, The Journal of applied psychology.

[52]  P. J. Pelto,et al.  The differences between “tight” and “loose” societies , 1968 .

[53]  J. Rubin,et al.  Negotiation , 1983 .

[54]  Adam D. Galinsky,et al.  Putting More on the Table: How Making Multiple Offers Can Increase the Final Value of the Deal , 2005 .

[55]  Michael J. Prietula,et al.  Knowledge Matters: The Effect of Tactical Descriptions on Negotiation Behavior and Outcome , 1996 .

[56]  J. H. Davis,et al.  An Integrative Model Of Organizational Trust , 1995 .

[57]  John R. Baldwin,et al.  The relationship of individualism–collectivism and self-construals to communication styles in India and the United States , 2003 .

[58]  R. Inglehart,et al.  Human values and beliefs : a cross-cultural sourcebook : political, religious, sexual, and economic norms in 43 societies : findings from the 1990-1993 world values survey , 1998 .

[59]  Philip L. Smith,et al.  Resolving the empty core: trust as a determinant of outcomes in three-party negotiations , 2007 .

[60]  Roy J. Lewicki,et al.  Extending and testing a five factor model of ethical and unethical bargaining tactics: Introducing the SINS scale. , 2000 .

[61]  Feixue Wang,et al.  The intercultural trust paradigm: Studying joint cultural interaction and social exchange in real time over the Internet , 2008 .

[62]  R. Lewicki,et al.  Reparing Relationships Within and Between Organizations: Building A Conceptual Foundation , 2009 .

[63]  Mara Olekalns,et al.  Moments in Time: Metacognition, Trust, and Outcomes in Dyadic Negotiations , 2005, Personality & social psychology bulletin.

[64]  Michael J. Prietula,et al.  Getting to best: efficiency versus optimality in negotiation , 2000, Cogn. Sci..

[65]  Dee G. Appley.  Beyond Culture , 1977 .

[66]  Philip L. Smith,et al.  Quantitative Coding of Negotiation Behavior , 2004 .

[67]  Mark R. Rosenzweig,et al.  Traditional Institutions Meet the Modern World: Caste, Gender and Schooling Choice in a Globalizing Economy , 2003 .

[68]  P. Shrout,et al.  Mediation in experimental and nonexperimental studies: new procedures and recommendations. , 2002, Psychological methods.

[69]  E. D. Boldt.  Structural tightness, autonomy, and observability: an analysis of Hutterite conformity , 1978 .

[70]  R. Dawes,et al.  Swift Neighbors and Persistent Strangers: A Cross‐Cultural Investigation of Trust and Reciprocity in Social Exchange1 , 2002, American Journal of Sociology.

[71]  J. Brett.  Negotiating globally: how to negotiate deals, resolve disputes, and make decisions across cultural boundaries, second edition , 2001 .

[72]  Wendi L. Adair,et al.  The timing and function of offers in U.S. and Japanese negotiations. , 2007, The Journal of applied psychology.

[73]  J. G. Miller.  Culture and development of everyday social explanation. , 1984, Journal of personality and social psychology.

[74]  S. Sitkin,et al.  Explaining the Limited Effectiveness of Legalistic “Remedies” for Trust/Distrust , 1993 .

[75]  V. R. Panchamukhi,et al.  भारतदेशस्य आर्थिकं सर्वेक्षणम् = Economic survey of India , 2000 .

[76]  Deepak Malhotra,et al.  NORMAL ACTS OF IRRATIONAL TRUST: MOTIVATED ATTRIBUTIONS AND THE TRUST DEVELOPMENT PROCESS , 2004 .

[77]  D. Ferrin,et al.  Trust differences across national-societal cultures: Much to do, or much ado about nothing? , 2010 .

[78]  Richard J. Klimoski,et al.  Toward a theory of accountability in organizations and human resource management. , 1998 .

[79]  H. Raiffa.  The art and science of negotiation , 1983 .

[80]  Jana L. Raver,et al.  On the nature and importance of cultural tightness-looseness. , 2006, The Journal of applied psychology.

[81]  M. Kirton,et al.  Adaptors and innovators : preference for educational procedures , 1991 .

[82]  Alice Tomic,et al.  Negotiating Globally: How to Negotiate Deals, Resolve Disputes, and Make Decisions across Cultural Boundaries , 2002 .

[83]  Lane Kelley,et al.  Special Issue: Trust in an Organizational Context: Levels of Organizational Trust in Individualist Versus Collectivist Societies: A Seven-Nation Study , 2003, Organ. Sci..

[84]  C. G. Glenn,et al.  Man and Mankind: Conflict and Communication Between Cultures , 1981 .

[85]  D. Ferrin,et al.  Removing the shadow of suspicion: the effects of apology versus denial for repairing competence- versus integrity-based trust violations. , 2004, The Journal of applied psychology.

[86]  Jeanne M. Brett,et al.  Sticks and Stones: Language, Face, and Online Dispute Resolution , 2007 .

[87]  Sendil K. Ethiraj,et al.  Where Do Capabilities Come from and How Do They Matter? A Study in the Software Services Industry , 2005 .

[88]  R. Kramer,et al.  Trust in Organizations: Frontiers of Theory and Research , 1995 .

[89]  Colin Camerer,et al.  Not So Different After All: A Cross-Discipline View Of Trust , 1998 .

[90]  R. Rumberger.  Hierarchical linear models: Applications and data analysis methods: and. Newbury Park, CA: Sage, 1992. (ISBN 0-8039-4627-9), pp. xvi + 265. Price: U.S. $45.00 (cloth) , 1997 .

[91]  R. M. March.  The Japanese Negotiator: Subtlety and Strategy Beyond Western Logic , 1988 .

[92]  H. Triandis.  The Self and Social Behavior in Differing Cultural Contexts , 1989 .

[93]  E. D. Boldt.  Structural Tightness and Cross-Cultural Research , 1978 .