Internet use in rheumatology outpatients in 2006: gender less important.

OBJECTIVE Exploring patients' Internet use, their online needs and requirements, expectations and attitudes towards the Internet is mandatory to effectively provide interactive online applications and information. METHODS Within a prospective study, 153 consecutive outpatients with rheumatoid arthritis, systemic lupus erythematosus or spondyloarthritis answered a paper-based questionnaire investigating their Internet use, interests, pattern and degree of utilization. Sociodemographic and functional disability data were collected. The data were compared with our survey of 2001 and to the normal German population. RESULTS Patients were predominantly female (69.3%; n.s.). Mean age was 45.7+/-14.4 years (n.s.). 68.6% (+18.6%, p=0.0027) reported regular Internet use for 5.0+/-2.6 yrs. Internet use in 2006 is still age- and education-dependent (p<0.001, p=0.003). Differences by gender observed in 2001 no longer existed as women increased their Internet use from 2.9 to 6.1 hours/week (p=0.001, p=0.0006). Searching for health-related information remained an important topic. Interest in e-communication and interactive applications strongly increased. Independently of gender and functional disability, patients' future online interests focussed on information on diseases, medications, health care providers and patient education. Confidence in the Internet and reliability of information were rated unchanged since 2001. CONCLUSION Gender no longer has significant impact on Internet use. The great potentials of Internet services-well accepted by patients and contributing substantially to more effective and improved disease (self-) management strategies-should encourage rheumatologists to provide interactive applications and high-quality information on Internet platforms and in routine patient care. Continuous research to explore the effects of Internet-delivered information on patients' attitudes,expectations, behaviour and outcome is required.

[1]  Patrick J. McGrath,et al.  Construct validity of a multidimensional electronic pain diary for adolescents with arthritis , 2008, PAIN.

[2]  M. Sajid,et al.  Internet information on colorectal cancer: commercialization and lack of quality control , 2008, Colorectal disease : the official journal of the Association of Coloproctology of Great Britain and Ireland.

[3]  A. Jatoi,et al.  Shopping for nutrition-based complementary and alternative medicine on the internet: How much money might cancer patients be spending online? , 2007, Journal of Cancer Education.

[4]  W. Sandborn,et al.  Internet use by patients in an inflammatory bowel disease specialty clinic , 2007, Inflammatory bowel diseases.

[5]  M. H. van den Berg,et al.  Internet-Based Physical Activity Interventions: A Systematic Review of the Literature , 2007, Journal of medical Internet research.

[6]  Maaike J de Boer,et al.  Patients' use of the Internet for pain-related medical information. , 2007, Patient education and counseling.

[7]  Christopher T. Chan,et al.  Internet use by end‐stage renal disease patients , 2007, Hemodialysis international. International Symposium on Home Hemodialysis.

[8]  John H Stone,et al.  Communication between physicians and patients in the era of E-medicine. , 2007, The New England journal of medicine.

[9]  John H Wasson,et al.  Patients use an internet technology to report when things go wrong , 2007, Quality and Safety in Health Care.

[10]  C. Chronaki,et al.  European citizens' use of E-health services: A study of seven countries , 2007, BMC public health.

[11]  S L Parsons,et al.  A survey of patient satisfaction and use of the internet for health information , 2007, International journal of clinical practice.

[12]  C. Hartmann,et al.  A Website to Improve Asthma Care by Suggesting Patient Questions for Physicians: Qualitative Analysis of User Experiences , 2007, Journal of medical Internet research.

[13]  R. Snyder,et al.  Information from the Internet: attitudes of Australian oncology patients , 2006, Internal medicine journal.

[14]  M. McMullan Patients using the Internet to obtain health information: how this affects the patient-health professional relationship. , 2006, Patient education and counseling.

[15]  Maureen A Smith,et al.  A typology of preferences for participation in healthcare decision making. , 2006, Social science & medicine.

[16]  F. Griffiths,et al.  Why Are Health Care Interventions Delivered Over the Internet? A Systematic Review of the Published Literature , 2006, Journal of medical Internet research.

[17]  N. Menachemi,et al.  Physicians’ Use of Email With Patients: Factors Influencing Electronic Communication and Adherence to Best Practices , 2006, Journal of medical Internet research.

[18]  Jennifer N Stinson,et al.  e-Ouch: Usability Testing of an Electronic Chronic Pain Diary for Adolescents With Arthritis , 2006, The Clinical journal of pain.

[19]  A. Zink,et al.  [The National Database of the German Arthritis Centres--a 12 year balance]. , 2006, Zeitschrift fur Rheumatologie.

[20]  A. Zink,et al.  Die Kerndokumentation der Rheumazentren — Bilanz nach 12 Jahren , 2006, Zeitschrift für Rheumatologie.

[21]  Daniel P Lorence,et al.  The zeitgeist of online health search. Implications for a consumer-centric health system. , 2006, Journal of general internal medicine.

[22]  Gary L. Kreps,et al.  Trust and sources of health information: the impact of the Internet and its implications for health care providers: findings from the first Health Information National Trends Survey. , 2005, Archives of internal medicine.

[23]  S. McLachlan,et al.  Attitudes of oncology health professionals to information from the Internet and other media , 2005, The Medical journal of Australia.

[24]  A. Jadad What will it take to bring the internet into the consulting room? , 2005, Journal of general internal medicine.

[25]  Christopher N. Sciamanna,et al.  Brief Report: What types of internet guidance do patients want from their physicians? , 2005, Journal of General Internal Medicine.

[26]  Wolfgang Himmel,et al.  Information Needs and Visitors' Experience of an Internet Expert Forum on Infertility , 2005, Journal of medical Internet research.

[27]  J. Rowland,et al.  Information needs and sources of information among cancer patients: a systematic review of research (1980-2003). , 2005, Patient education and counseling.

[28]  W. van Lankveld,et al.  Disease related use of the internet in chronically ill adults: current and expected use , 2005, Annals of the rheumatic diseases.

[29]  Eugenie M Komives,et al.  Clinician-patient E-mail communication: challenges for reimbursement. , 2005, North Carolina medical journal.

[30]  David Young,et al.  Research Paper: Patient Experiences and Attitudes about Access to a Patient Electronic Health Care Record and Linked Web Messaging , 2004, J. Am. Medical Informatics Assoc..

[31]  Laurence C. Baker,et al.  Use of the Internet for Health Information by the Chronically Ill , 2004, Preventing chronic disease.

[32]  Steven J Katz,et al.  The emerging role of online communication between patients and their providers , 2004, Journal of General Internal Medicine.

[33]  A. Sheikh,et al.  Email consultations in health care: 1—scope and effectiveness , 2004, BMJ : British Medical Journal.

[34]  J. Richter,et al.  Krankheitsbezogene Internetnutzung bei Patienten mit entzündlich-rheumatischen Systemerkrankungen , 2004, Zeitschrift für Rheumatologie.

[35]  Debra Revere,et al.  Patients' experience with a diabetes support programme based on an interactive electronic medical record: qualitative study , 2004, BMJ : British Medical Journal.

[36]  J. Fowles,et al.  Patients' interest in reading their medical record: relation with clinical and sociodemographic characteristics and patients' approach to health care. , 2004, Archives of internal medicine.

[37]  Leslie Lenert,et al.  A web-compatible instrument for measuring self-reported disease activity in arthritis. , 2004, The Journal of rheumatology.

[38]  Kristen Shuyler,et al.  What Are Patients Seeking When They Turn to the Internet? Qualitative Content Analysis of Questions Asked by Visitors to an Orthopaedics Web Site , 2003, Journal of medical Internet research.

[39]  L. Baker,et al.  Use of the Internet and e-mail for health care information: results from a national survey. , 2003, JAMA.

[40]  J. Powell,et al.  The doctor, the patient and the world-wide web: how the internet is changing healthcare. , 2003, Journal of the Royal Society of Medicine.

[41]  R Madhok,et al.  The use of the Internet as a resource for health information among patients attending a rheumatology clinic. , 2002, Rheumatology.

[42]  J. Allison,et al.  Users of Internet Health Information: Differences by Health Status , 2002, Journal of medical Internet research.

[43]  C. Gordon,et al.  Development and assessment of a World Wide Web site for systemic lupus erythematosus patient information , 2002, Lupus.

[44]  B. S. Larson Medications Through the Internet , 2002 .

[45]  J Richter,et al.  RheumaNet--a novel Internet-based rheumatology information network in Germany. , 1998, British journal of rheumatology.

[46]  J. Baudet,et al.  [Internet use to obtain health information among patients attending a digestive diseases office]. , 2006, Gastroenterologia y hepatologia.

[47]  Janese M. Willis,et al.  Perceptions about Use of a Patient Internet Portal among Medicaid Beneficiaries , 2006, AMIA.

[48]  JD Dr. Daniel P. Lorence PhD,et al.  The zeitgeist of online health search , 2006, Journal of General Internal Medicine.

[49]  J. Richter,et al.  [Disease-oriented Internet use in outpatients with inflammatory rheumatic diseases]. , 2004, Zeitschrift fur Rheumatologie.

[50]  J. Burns,et al.  Interactive Health Communication Applications for people with chronic disease. , 2004, The Cochrane database of systematic reviews.

[51]  B. S. Larson Medications through the Internet: what clinicians and patients need to know. , 2002, Journal of pain & palliative care pharmacotherapy.