Locating acoustic emission sources in complex structures using Gaussian processes

A standard technique in the field of non-destructive evaluation is to use acoustic emissions to characterise and locate the damage events that generate them. The location problem is typically posed in terms of the times of flight of the waves and results in an optimisation problem, which can at times be ill-posed. A method is proposed here for learning the relationship between time of flight differences and damage location using data generated by artificially stimulated acoustic emission (AE)-a classic problem of regression. A structure designed to represent a complicated aerospace component was interrogated using a laser to thermoelastically generate AE at multiple points across the structure's surface. Piezoelectric transducers were mounted on the surface of the structure, and the resulting waveforms were recorded. A Gaussian process (GP) with RBF kernels was chosen for regression. Since during AE monitoring not all events can be guaranteed to be detected by all sensors, a GP was trained on data for all possible combinations (subsets) of sensors. The inputs to the GPs were the differences in time of flight between sensors in the set, and the targets were the locations of the source of ultrasonic stimulation. Subsequent (test) data points were located by every possible GP, given the active sensors. It is shown that maps learned on a given structure can generalise effectively to nominally identical structures.

[1]  Geoffrey E. Hinton,et al.  Bayesian Learning for Neural Networks , 1995 .

[2]  Karen Margaret Holford,et al.  Delta T source location for acoustic emission , 2007 .

[3]  Carl E. Rasmussen,et al.  Gaussian processes for machine learning , 2005, Adaptive computation and machine learning.

[4]  Jochen H Kurz,et al.  Strategies for reliable automatic onset time picking of acoustic emissions and of ultrasound signals in concrete. , 2005, Ultrasonics.

[5]  K. Holford Acoustic Emission–Basic Principles and Future Directions , 2000 .

[6]  Christopher M. Bishop,et al.  Neural networks for pattern recognition , 1995 .

[7]  J. Rose Ultrasonic Waves in Solid Media , 1999 .

[8]  M. Hamstad,et al.  A WAVELET TRANSFORM APPLIED TO ACOUSTIC EMISSION SIGNALS: PART 1: SOURCE IDENTIFICATION # , 2002 .

[9]  C. B. Scruby,et al.  Characterization of fatigue of aluminum alloys by acoustic emission, Part I—identification of source mechanism , 1990 .

[10]  Keith Worden,et al.  An automatic impact monitor for a composite panel employing smart sensor technology , 2005 .

[11]  David J. C. MacKay,et al.  Information Theory, Inference, and Learning Algorithms , 2004, IEEE Transactions on Information Theory.

[12]  John A. Nelder,et al.  A Simplex Method for Function Minimization , 1965, Comput. J..

[13]  Zoubin Ghahramani,et al.  Sparse Gaussian Processes using Pseudo-inputs , 2005, NIPS.

[14]  James Hensman,et al.  Wavelet Based Feature Extraction for Acoustic Emission , 2007 .