THE IMPACT OF FORMATIVE AND SUMMATIVE EVALUATION OF TEACHING IN NORTH AMERICAN UNIVERSITIES

ABSTRACT This paper reviews recent research evidence on formative (developmental) and summative (judgemental) evaluation of teaching in North American universities. The major conclusions of the review are as follows: (1) student ratings are the most common method of evaluating teaching in North American universities, and their popularity appears to be increasing; (2) student ratings have been found to provide reliable and valid information on limited aspects of teaching competence; (3) teaching evaluations make a difference in decisions on faculty salary, tenure and promotion; (4) evaluation of teaching has been shown to produce modest improvements in teaching effectiveness; (5) faculty satisfaction with teaching evaluation practices ranges from very high to very low, depending on institutional context; and (6) there is consensus that several specific improvements are needed in the current teaching evaluation system.

[1]  W. McKeachie,et al.  Using Student Ratings and Consultation to Improve Instruction. , 1980 .

[2]  John A. Centra,et al.  Effectiveness of Student Feedback in Modifying College Instruction. , 1973 .

[3]  R. Fenker.  The Incentive Structure of a University , 1977 .

[4]  P. A. Cohen.  Student Ratings of Instruction and Student Achievement: A Meta-analysis of Multisection Validity Studies , 1981 .

[5]  Dennis C. Scheck.  The Use and Abuse of Student Evaluations of Teaching Effectiveness in Higher Education. , 1978 .

[6]  Wilbert J. McKeachie,et al.  Student Ratings of Faculty: A Reprise. , 1979 .

[7]  Herbert W. Marsh,et al.  Midterm feedback from students: Its relationship to instructional improvement and students' cognitive and affective outcomes. , 1979 .

[8]  John A. Centra,et al.  Research productivity and teaching effectiveness , 1981 .

[9]  James A. Anderson,et al.  Student evaluation: The faculty responds , 1980 .

[10]  A survey of selected administrative practices supporting student evaluation of instruction programs , 1975 .

[11]  T. Salthouse,et al.  An Experimental Investigation of Factors Affecting University Promotion Decisions: A Brief Report. , 1978 .

[12]  D. Hoyt.  Interrelationships among instructional effectiveness, publication record, and monetary reward , 1974 .

[13]  J. D. Heilman,et al.  The rating of college teachers on ten traits by their students. , 1936 .

[14]  R. Renner.  Comparing Professors: How Student Ratings Contribute to the Decline in Quality of Higher Education. , 1981 .

[15]  John A. Centra,et al.  Determining faculty effectiveness , 1980 .

[16]  Peter A. Cohen,et al.  Effectiveness of student-rating feedback for improving college instruction: A meta-analysis of findings , 1980 .

[17]  A. Small,et al.  A Survey of Faculty Opinions about Student Evaluations of Instructors , 1979 .