Numerical Subtraction in the Pigeon: Evidence for a Linear Subjective Number Scale

When humans and animals compare two numbers, responding is faster and more accurate with increasing numerical disparity and decreasing numerical size. Researchers explaining these distance and size effects often assume that the subjective number continuum is logarithmically compressed. An alternative hypothesis is that the subjective number continuum is linear, but positions farther along it are proportionately fuzzier, that is, less precisely located. These two hypotheses have been treated as functionally equivalent because of their similar empirical predictions. The current experiment sought to resolve this issue with a paradigm originally developed to address the subjective representation of time (time left). In our adaptation, pigeons were required to compare a constant number with the number remaining after a numerical subtraction. Our results indicate that subjective number is linearly, not logarithmically, related to objective number.

[1]  H S Terrace,et al.  Representation of the numerosities 1-9 by rhesus macaques (Macaca mulatta). , 2000, Journal of experimental psychology. Animal behavior processes.

[2]  C. Gallistel,et al.  Non-verbal numerical cognition: from reals to integers , 2000, Trends in Cognitive Sciences.

[3]  F. Craik,et al.  Memories, Thoughts, and Emotions : Essays in Honor of George Mandler , 1991 .

[4]  W. Roberts,et al.  USING THE PEAK PROCEDURE TO MEASURE TIMING AND COUNTING PROCESSES IN PIGEONS , 1998 .

[5]  Fetterman Jg,et al.  Numerosity discrimination: both time and number matter , 1993 .

[6]  S. Dehaene,et al.  Abstract representations of numbers in the animal and human brain , 1998, Trends in Neurosciences.

[7]  Rochel Gelman,et al.  Subitizing: The preverbal counting process. , 1991 .

[8]  J G Fetterman,et al.  Numerosity discrimination: both time and number matter. , 1993, Journal of experimental psychology. Animal behavior processes.

[9]  C. Gallistel,et al.  Nonverbal Counting in Humans: The Psychophysics of Number Representation , 1999 .

[10]  Tetsuro Matsuzawa,et al.  Use of numbers by a chimpanzee , 1985, Nature.

[11]  W. Roberts Chapter 5 Does a common mechanism account for timing and counting phenomena in the pigeon , 1997 .

[12]  S S Stevens,et al.  To Honor Fechner and Repeal His Law: A power function, not a log function, describes the operating characteristic of a sensory system. , 1961, Science.

[13]  S. Dehaene Varieties of numerical abilities , 1992, Cognition.

[14]  F Mechner,et al.  Probability Relations within Response Sequences under Ratio Reinforcement. , 1958, Journal of the experimental analysis of behavior.

[15]  ROBERT S. MOYER,et al.  Time required for Judgements of Numerical Inequality , 1967, Nature.

[16]  R M Church,et al.  Temporal integration in duration and number discrimination. , 1985, Journal of experimental psychology. Animal behavior processes.

[17]  R M Church,et al.  Time left: linear versus logarithmic subjective time. , 1981, Journal of experimental psychology. Animal behavior processes.

[18]  H Eisler,et al.  Experiments on subjective duration 1968-1975: a collection of power function exponents. , 1976, Psychological bulletin.

[19]  J. Gibbon Scalar expectancy theory and Weber's law in animal timing. , 1977 .

[20]  H S Terrace,et al.  Ordering of the numerosities 1 to 9 by monkeys. , 1998, Science.

[21]  S. J. Rule Equal discriminability scale of number. , 1969, Journal of experimental psychology.

[22]  R. Church,et al.  A mode control model of counting and timing processes. , 1983, Journal of experimental psychology. Animal behavior processes.

[23]  L H HICKS,et al.  An analysis of number-concept formation in the Rhesus monkey. , 1956, Journal of comparative and physiological psychology.

[24]  J Gibbon,et al.  Ratio versus difference comparators in choice. , 1994, Journal of the experimental analysis of behavior.

[25]  H. Davis,et al.  Numerical competence: From backwater to mainstream of comparative psychology , 1988, Behavioral and Brain Sciences.

[26]  S. Dehaene,et al.  Cross-linguistic regularities in the frequency of number words , 1992, Cognition.

[27]  C. Gallistel,et al.  Preverbal and verbal counting and computation , 1992, Cognition.