Heading towards the nZEB through CHP+HP systems. A comparison between retrofit solutions able to increase the energy performance for the heating and domestic hot water production in residential buildings

Abstract Optimizing consumptions in the field of civil construction led to define energy labels for residential buildings. To calculate the building energy demand the EPgl was determined, i.e. the annual consumption per m 2 of primary energy. This paper examines the technical solutions useful to optimize the energy demands for heating during space-heating season and domestic hot water production (thanks to energy analysis softwares as MC11300 and TRNSYS) and, at the same time, to take into account the financial issues those interventions implied. The total inside heated surface of the building case study is 1204.00 m 2 , hence the inside heated volume is about 3250.80 m 3 . Besides the more traditional interventions concerning the building envelope and its systems, the paper examined the performance of a system obtained through the combination of a cogenerator (CHP) and a heat pump (HP), thus, substituting the conventional boilers of the buildings. CHP+HP solution increases the most the energy label of the building (from a D class with EPgl = 59.62 kW h m −2  year −1 , to an A class, with EPgl = 25.64 kW h m −2  year −1 ), determining an annual energy cost saving of 3,114 € year −1 , allowing to amortize installation costs (54,560 €) in a reasonable payback period, i.e. 15.4 years. This innovative solution in the residential sector can be realized through retrofit interventions on existing buildings, hence it leads the current dwelling towards nZEB with a remarkable benefits for the environment.

[1]  Ferdinando Salata,et al.  The reliability of technological systems with high energy efficiency in residential buildings , 2014 .

[2]  Ferdinando Salata,et al.  Plant Reliability in Hospital Facilities , 2014 .

[3]  M. Lehtonen,et al.  Analyzing the optimal coordination of a residential micro-CHP system with a power sink , 2015 .

[4]  Labanca Nicola,et al.  Energy Efficiency Status Report 2012 - Electricity Consumption and Efficiency Trends in the EU-27 , 2012 .

[5]  Genku Kayo,et al.  Energy sharing and matching in different combinations of buildings, CHP capacities and operation strategy , 2014 .

[6]  Natasa Nord,et al.  Implementation of CCPP for energy supply of future building stock , 2015 .

[7]  A. Hestnes,et al.  Solar energy for net zero energy buildings – A comparison between solar thermal, PV and photovoltaic–thermal (PV/T) systems , 2015 .

[8]  Jayanta Deb Mondol,et al.  Modelling and simulation of Building-Integrated solar thermal systems: Behaviour of the coupled building/system configuration , 2015 .

[9]  Florin Iordache,et al.  Energy performance assessment of a complex district heating system which uses gas-driven combined heat and power, heat pumps and high temperature aquifer thermal energy storage , 2014 .

[10]  Pierluigi Mancarella.  Cogeneration systems with electric heat pumps: Energy-shifting properties and equivalent plant modelling , 2009 .

[11]  Sunliang Cao,et al.  Matching indices taking the dynamic hybrid electrical and thermal grids information into account for the decision-making of nZEB on-site renewable energy systems , 2015 .

[12]  Ala Hasan,et al.  On-site energy matching indices for buildings with energy conversion, storage and hybrid grid connections , 2013 .

[13]  J. W. Twidell,et al.  Modelling of a combined heat and power (CHP) plant incorporating a heat pump for domestic use , 1997 .

[14]  M. Hamdy,et al.  A multi-stage optimization method for cost-optimal and nearly-zero-energy building solutions in line with the EPBD-recast 2010 , 2013 .

[15]  Luca Evangelisti,et al.  Building energy performance analysis: A case study , 2015 .

[16]  Ala Hasan,et al.  The performance of small scale multi-generation technologies in achieving cost-optimal and zero-energy office building solutions , 2015 .

[17]  P. C. Few,et al.  Domestic-scale combined heat-and-power system incorporating a heat pump: analysis of a prototype plant , 2001 .

[18]  Anna Laura Pisello,et al.  A method for assessing buildings’ energy efficiency by dynamic simulation and experimental activity , 2012 .

[19]  Alessandro Franco,et al.  Experimental analysis of a self consumption strategy for residential building: The integration of PV system and geothermal heat pump , 2016 .

[20]  M. Dresselhaus,et al.  Alternative energy technologies , 2001, Nature.

[21]  Hugo Hens,et al.  Energy savings in retrofitted dwellings: economically viable? , 2005 .

[22]  Jacobo Porteiro,et al.  Feasibility of a new domestic CHP trigeneration with heat pump: II. Availability analysis , 2004 .

[23]  Ala Hasan,et al.  Analysis and solution for renewable energy load matching for a single-family house , 2013 .

[24]  Klaus Lucas.  Efficient energy systems on the basis of cogeneration and heat pump technology , 2001 .

[25]  Alexander V. Lotov,et al.  Interactive Decision Maps: Approximation and Visualization of Pareto Frontier , 2004 .

[26]  Ferdinando Salata,et al.  Method for energy optimization with reliability analysis of a trigeneration and teleheating system on urban scale: A case study , 2015 .

[27]  Ala Hasan,et al.  Energy matching analysis for net-zero energy buildings , 2016 .

[28]  Philippe Rivière,et al.  Performance analysis of heating systems for low energy houses , 2013 .

[29]  Paris A. Fokaides,et al.  European smart cities: The role of zero energy buildings , 2015 .

[30]  Michael P. Friedlander,et al.  Probing the Pareto Frontier for Basis Pursuit Solutions , 2008, SIAM J. Sci. Comput..

[31]  Baris Tan,et al.  Optimal selection of energy efficiency measures for energy sustainability of existing buildings , 2016, Comput. Oper. Res..

[32]  Gianluigi Lo Basso,et al.  H2NG (hydrogen-natural gas mixtures) effects on energy performances of a condensing micro-CHP (combined heat and power) for residential applications: An expeditious assessment of water condensation and experimental analysis , 2015 .

[33]  P. C. Few,et al.  Second law analysis of an experimental domestic scale co-generation plant incorporating a heat pump , 2001 .

[34]  Unfccc.  Kyoto Protocol to the United Nations Framework Convention on Climate Change , 1997 .

[35]  Ferdinando Salata,et al.  A CASE STUDY OF TECHNICAL AND ECONOMIC COMPARISON AMONG ENERGY PRODUCTION SYSTEMS IN A COMPLEX OF HISTORIC BUILDINGS IN ROME , 2014 .

[36]  Pedro J. Mago,et al.  Design and feasibility study of combined heat and power systems integrated with heat pump , 2016 .

[37]  Ala Hasan,et al.  Energy matching analysis of on-site micro-cogeneration for a single-family house with thermal and electrical tracking strategies , 2014 .

[38]  Antonio Piacentino,et al.  Matching economical, energetic and environmental benefits: An analysis for hybrid CHCP-heat pump systems , 2006 .

[39]  Ala Hasan,et al.  Fulfillment of net-zero energy building (NZEB) with four metrics in a single family house with different heating alternatives , 2014 .

[40]  Juha Jokisalo,et al.  Cost-optimal thermal energy storage system for a residential building with heat pump heating and demand response control , 2016 .

[41]  Ala Hasan,et al.  Selection of micro-cogeneration for net zero energy buildings (NZEB) using weighted energy matching index , 2014 .

[42]  Amaryllis Audenaert,et al.  Improving the energy performance of residential buildings: A literature review , 2015 .

[43]  Jacobo Porteiro,et al.  Feasibility of a new domestic CHP trigeneration with heat pump: I. Design and development , 2004 .