Biologically representative and well‐connected marine reserves enhance biodiversity persistence in conservation planning

Current methods in conservation planning for promoting the persistence of biodiversity typically focus on either representing species geographic distributions or maintaining connectivity between reserves, but rarely both, and take a focal species, rather than a multispecies, approach. Here, we link prioritization methods with population models to explore the impact of integrating both representation and connectivity into conservation planning for species persistence. Using data on 288 Mediterranean fish species with varying conservation requirements, we show that: (1) considering both representation and connectivity objectives provides the best strategy for enhanced biodiversity persistence and (2) connectivity objectives were fundamental to enhancing persistence of small-ranged species, which are most in need of conservation, while the representation objective benefited only wide-ranging species. Our approach provides a more comprehensive appraisal of planning applications than approaches focusing on either representation or connectivity, and will hopefully contribute to build more effective reserve networks for the persistence of biodiversity

[1]  Hugh P Possingham,et al.  Incorporating larval dispersal into MPA design for both conservation and fisheries. , 2017, Ecological applications : a publication of the Ecological Society of America.

[2]  Robert L. Pressey,et al.  Integrating connectivity and climate change into marine conservation planning , 2014 .

[3]  Hugh P. Possingham,et al.  Incorporating asymmetric connectivity into spatial decision making for conservation , 2010 .

[4]  S. Manel,et al.  Low Connectivity between Mediterranean Marine Protected Areas: A Biophysical Modeling Approach for the Dusky Grouper Epinephelus marginatus , 2013, PloS one.

[5]  Piero Visconti,et al.  Making parks make a difference: poor alignment of policy, planning and management with protected-area impact, and ways forward , 2015, Philosophical Transactions of the Royal Society B: Biological Sciences.

[6]  S. Somot,et al.  Additive effects of climate change on connectivity between marine protected areas and larval supply to fished areas , 2015 .

[7]  Geoff Jones,et al.  Planning Marine Reserve Networks for Both Feature Representation and Demographic Persistence Using Connectivity Patterns , 2016, PloS one.

[8]  James E. M. Watson,et al.  Shortfalls and Solutions for Meeting National and Global Conservation Area Targets , 2015 .

[9]  Patrick N. Halpin,et al.  Marine population connectivity identifies ecological neighbors for conservation planning in the Coral Triangle , 2012 .

[10]  R. L. Pressey,et al.  Connectivity, biodiversity conservation and the design of marine reserve networks for coral reefs , 2009, Coral Reefs.

[11]  S. Andelman,et al.  Mathematical Methods for Identifying Representative Reserve Networks , 2000 .

[12]  S. Gaines,et al.  Model-based assessment of persistence in proposed marine protected area designs. , 2009, Ecological applications : a publication of the Ecological Society of America.

[13]  Richard M Cowling,et al.  Conservation planning in a changing world. , 2007, Trends in ecology & evolution.

[14]  Aldina M. A. Franco,et al.  Prioritizing multiple-use landscapes for conservation: methods for large multi-species planning problems , 2005, Proceedings of the Royal Society B: Biological Sciences.

[15]  Wilfried Thuiller,et al.  Extending networks of protected areas to optimize connectivity and population growth rate , 2015 .

[16]  Robert L. Pressey,et al.  Formulating conservation targets for biodiversity pattern and process in the Cape Floristic Region, South Africa , 2003 .

[17]  Hugh P Possingham,et al.  Six Common Mistakes in Conservation Priority Setting , 2013, Conservation biology : the journal of the Society for Conservation Biology.

[18]  Alan Hastings,et al.  Population persistence in marine reserve networks: incorporating spatial heterogeneities in larval dispersal , 2010 .

[19]  S. Sarkar,et al.  Systematic conservation planning , 2000, Nature.

[20]  Carolina Parada,et al.  A Lagrangian tool for modelling ichthyoplankton dynamics , 2008, Environ. Model. Softw..

[21]  S. Somot,et al.  The Biodiversity of the Mediterranean Sea: Estimates, Patterns, and Threats , 2010, PloS one.

[22]  Dean L Urban,et al.  Graph theory as a proxy for spatially explicit population models in conservation planning. , 2007, Ecological applications : a publication of the Ecological Society of America.

[23]  A. Götz,et al.  Marine protected area improves yield without disadvantaging fishers , 2013, Nature Communications.

[24]  W. Jetz,et al.  Unravelling the structure of species extinction risk for predictive conservation science , 2011, Proceedings of the Royal Society B: Biological Sciences.

[25]  Gábor Csárdi,et al.  The igraph software package for complex network research , 2006 .

[26]  R. Cowen,et al.  Larval dispersal and marine population connectivity. , 2009, Annual review of marine science.

[27]  Elizabeth A. Moffitt,et al.  Decision analysis for designing marine protected areas for multiple species with uncertain fishery status. , 2010, Ecological applications : a publication of the Ecological Society of America.

[28]  Brendan A. Wintle,et al.  CONSERVATION PLANNING WITH DYNAMIC THREATS: THE ROLE OF SPATIAL DESIGN AND PRIORITY SETTING FOR SPECIES PERSISTENCE , 2010 .

[29]  M. Araújo,et al.  Representing taxonomic, phylogenetic and functional diversity: new challenges for Mediterranean marine‐protected areas , 2015 .

[30]  Martin Nilsson Jacobi,et al.  Optimal networks of nature reserves can be found through eigenvalue perturbation theory of the connectivity matrix. , 2011, Ecological applications : a publication of the Ecological Society of America.

[31]  Joshua S Madin,et al.  Predicting IUCN Extinction Risk Categories for the World's Data Deficient Groupers (Teleostei: Epinephelidae) , 2016 .

[32]  M. Fortin,et al.  EDITOR'S CHOICE: Stepping stones are crucial for species' long‐distance dispersal and range expansion through habitat networks , 2014 .

[33]  Andrea Costa,et al.  On the calculation of betweenness centrality in marine connectivity studies using transfer probabilities , 2017, bioRxiv.

[34]  R. Pressey,et al.  Integrated conservation planning for coral reefs: Designing conservation zones for multiple conservation objectives in spatial prioritisation , 2017 .

[35]  S. Somot,et al.  FishMed: traits, phylogeny, current and projected species distribution of Mediterranean fishes, and environmental data , 2015 .

[36]  Karin Frank,et al.  A new method for conservation planning for the persistence of multiple species. , 2006, Ecology letters.

[37]  A. Hastings,et al.  Persistence of spatial populations depends on returning home. , 2006, Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America.

[38]  H. Possingham,et al.  Hitting the target and missing the point: target‐based conservation planning in context , 2009 .

[39]  Robert L. Pressey,et al.  Integrating multiple species connectivity and habitat quality into conservation planning for coral reefs , 2016 .

[40]  Atte Moilanen,et al.  The Value of Biodiversity in Reserve Selection: Representation, Species Weighting, and Benefit Functions , 2005 .

[41]  Elizabeth A. Moffitt,et al.  The utility and limitations of size and spacing guidelines for designing marine protected area (MPA) networks , 2011 .

[42]  Christopher A. Edwards,et al.  The Value of Larval Connectivity Information in the Static Optimization of Marine Reserve Design , 2014 .

[43]  Marisa Rossetto,et al.  Evidence That Marine Reserves Enhance Resilience to Climatic Impacts , 2012, PloS one.

[44]  L. A. Barnett,et al.  Beyond connectivity: how empirical methods can quantify population persistence to improve marine protected-area design. , 2014, Ecological applications : a publication of the Ecological Society of America.