A dynamic multi-attribute utility theory–based decision support system for patient prioritization in the emergency department

The triage process may result in long waiting periods during which vital indicators of patients with apparently less urgent problems are not monitored after the initial triage. The integration of technology and decision theory has the potential to assist nurses in recognizing priorities by collecting data on the changing clinical information of patients and methodically organizing it. This study investigates the potential for integrating technology and multi-attribute utility theory (MAUT) to develop a dynamic decision support system (DSS) for patient prioritization in Emergency Department (ED) settings. An enhancement to the conventional MAUT model was made to incorporate changes in vital signs over time. A pilot study was conducted with data from 12 nurses and 47 patients. The dynamic MAUT model was assessed with a physician who made prioritization decisions independent of the model. A statistical analysis shows no significant difference between the recommendation proposed by the model and the decisions made by the physician. The results from the analysis give evidence for the potential benefits of combining technology with decision theory to aid nurses in prioritizing ED patients. These results can be used to further develop a DSS for dynamic patient prioritization in ED settings.

[1]  R. Beveridge,et al.  CAEP issues. The Canadian Triage and Acuity Scale: a new and critical element in health care reform. Canadian Association of Emergency Physicians. , 1998, The Journal of emergency medicine.

[2]  A. Freivalds,et al.  Waiting in the Emergency Department: Dynamics of Patients’ Vital Signs , 2011 .

[3]  Nikolaos G. Bourbakis,et al.  A Survey on Wearable Sensor-Based Systems for Health Monitoring and Prognosis , 2010, IEEE Transactions on Systems, Man, and Cybernetics, Part C (Applications and Reviews).

[4]  R. Williams.  Triage and emergency department services. , 1996, Annals of emergency medicine.

[5]  F. Hellinger.  Expected Utility Theory and Risky Choices with Health Outcomes , 1989, Medical care.

[6]  Richard J Holden,et al.  Lean Thinking in emergency departments: a critical review. , 2011, Annals of emergency medicine.

[7]  Timothy W. Simpson,et al.  A Multiattribute Utility Theory-Based Method for Product Line Selection , 2007 .

[8]  Ralph L. Keeney,et al.  The art of assessing multiattribute utility functions , 1977 .

[9]  David Claudio,et al.  Utility function-based patient prioritisation in the emergency department , 2010 .

[10]  E. Asgharizadeh,et al.  Comparison of the research units of ICT using MAUT via MBSC , 2008, 2008 3rd International Conference on Information and Communication Technologies: From Theory to Applications.

[11]  Craig W. Kirkwood,et al.  NOTES ON ATTITUDE TOWARD RISK TAKING AND THE EXPONENTIAL UTILITY FUNCTION , 2001 .

[12]  D. Eitel,et al.  Reliability and validity of a new five-level triage instrument. , 2000, Academic emergency medicine : official journal of the Society for Academic Emergency Medicine.

[13]  T. Bucknall,et al.  Triage nurses' clinical decision making. An observational study of urgency assessment. , 2001, Journal of advanced nursing.

[14]  Stuart B. Boxerman,et al.  Describing Nurses' Work: Combining Quantitative and Qualitative Analysis , 2006, Hum. Factors.

[15]  A. Botterud,et al.  Decision Analysis and Uncertainties in Planning Local Energy Systems , 2006, 2006 International Conference on Probabilistic Methods Applied to Power Systems.

[16]  Deborah L Thurston,et al.  Multi-Attribute Utility Analysis of Conflicting Preferences , 2006 .

[17]  P. Benner,et al.  Clinical judgment: how expert nurses use intuition. , 1987, The American journal of nursing.

[18]  R. Keeney.  Utility Functions for Multiattributed Consequences , 1972 .

[19]  D. Feeny,et al.  Multiattribute utility function for a comprehensive health status classification system. Health Utilities Index Mark 2. , 1996, Medical care.

[20]  Ralph L. Keeney,et al.  Multiplicative Utility Functions , 1974, Oper. Res..

[21]  Craig W. Kirkwood,et al.  Strategic decision making : multiobjective decision analysis with spreadsheets : instructor's manual , 1996 .

[22]  Andris Freivalds,et al.  Triage Decision Making: Discrepancies in assigning the Emergency Severity Index , 2009 .

[23]  Alison S. Day,et al.  The use of early warning scores in the emergency department. , 2010, Journal of emergency nursing: JEN : official publication of the Emergency Department Nurses Association.

[24]  R. Derlet.  Triage and ED Overcrowding: Two Cases of Unexpected Outcome. , 2002, The California journal of emergency medicine.

[25]  Chien-Lung Chan,et al.  A method combining MAU and Fuzzy Logic for cooperative decision making , 1998 .

[26]  K. Cone,et al.  Characteristics, insights, decision making, and preparation of ED triage nurses. , 2002, Journal of emergency nursing: JEN : official publication of the Emergency Department Nurses Association.

[27]  G. Chapman,et al.  A multi-attribute model of prostate cancer patients' preferences for health states , 1999, Quality of Life Research.

[28]  J. Richardson,et al.  Priority setting in health care using multi-attribute utility theory and programme budgeting and marginal analysis (PBMA). , 2007, Social science & medicine.

[29]  F. B. Vernadat,et al.  Decisions with Multiple Objectives: Preferences and Value Tradeoffs , 1994 .

[30]  R. L. Keeney,et al.  Decisions with Multiple Objectives: Preferences and Value Trade-Offs , 1977, IEEE Transactions on Systems, Man, and Cybernetics.

[31]  M. Boyle,et al.  Multiattribute and Single‐Attribute Utility Functions for the Health Utilities Index Mark 3 System , 2002, Medical care.

[32]  Andris Freivalds,et al.  A Case Study on How to Implement MAUT in Healthcare , 2011 .

[33]  Deborah L Thurston,et al.  Utility Function Fundamentals , 2006 .

[34]  J. J. Bolinger,et al.  Decision Analysis Utilizing Multi-Attribute Utility Theory in Engineering Evaluations , 1978, IEEE Transactions on Power Apparatus and Systems.

[35]  A. Ravi Ravindran,et al.  Experiments in multiple criteria selection problems with multiple decision makers , 2010 .

[36]  Sundar Krishnamurty.  Normative Decision Analysis in Engineering Design , 2006 .

[37]  J. Gerring.  A case study , 2011, Technology and Society.

[38]  Jonathan Barzilai,et al.  Preference Function Modelling: The Mathematical Foundations of Decision Theory , 2010, Trends in Multiple Criteria Decision Analysis.

[39]  Gary Klein,et al.  Naturalistic Decision Making , 2008, Hum. Factors.

[40]  William C. Giauque,et al.  Application of Multidimensional Utility Theory in Determining Optimal Test-Treatment Strategies for Streptococcal Sore Throat and Rheumatic Fever , 1976 .

[41]  Brian E. Forst,et al.  Decision Analysis and Medical Malpractice , 1974, Oper. Res..

[42]  David A Thompson,et al.  Five-level triage: a report from the ACEP/ENA Five-level Triage Task Force. , 2005, Journal of emergency nursing: JEN : official publication of the Emergency Department Nurses Association.

[43]  A. Andersson,et al.  Triage in the emergency department--a qualitative study of the factors which nurses consider when making decisions. , 2006, Nursing in critical care.

[44]  John Buchanan,et al.  Capturing decision maker preference: Experimental comparison of decision analysis and MCDM techniques , 1997 .