Prediction of metaphase II oocytes according to different serum Anti-Müllerian hormone (AMH) levels in antagonist ICSI cycles

Objective This paper aims to assess a qualitative aspect of ovarian response in terms of metaphase II oocytes according to different serum Anti-Müllerian hormone levels in antagonist ICSI cycles. A prediction index might contribute to the individualization of care. Methods This observational study looked into 287 antagonist ICSI cycles carried out with patients treated in a single center between January of 2012 and January of 2016. Serum AMH and subgroup analyses were performed based on five AMH ranges (≤ 0.3 ng/mL;> 0.3 and ≤ 0.7 ng/mL; > 0.7 and ≤ 1.0 ng/mL; > 1.0 and < 3.0 ng/mL; ≥ 3.0 ng/mL). The variables analyzed included patient age; serum FSH and antral follicle count at the start of the cycle; number of stimulation days and number follicles ≥ 15 mm on hCG day; number of oocytes retrieved and number of metaphase II oocytes. Results AMH is a better predictor of ovarian response to controlled ovarian stimulation than AFC or serum FSH, while age is an independent marker. AMH levels ≤0.70 (patients with poor prognosis) were observed in 140 patients (48.7%). Patients within this AMH level range accounted for 92% of the 24 failed cycles (cancelled cycles, no oocytes or immature oocytes retrieved). Conclusion AMH predicts the quality of ovarian response to stimulation, regardless of patient age. Women with AMH levels ≥1.0 and ≤3.0 ng/mL are probably normal responders with good prognosis. Clinical application relies on the examination of the data from each individual center and on the establishment of correlations between AMH levels and ovarian response in the form of metaphase II oocytes.

[1]  J. Crosby,et al.  Assisted reproductive techniques in Latin America: the Latin American Registry, 2015. , 2018, Reproductive biomedicine online.

[2]  J. Crosby,et al.  Assisted reproductive techniques in Latin America: The Latin American Registry, 2013. , 2016, JBRA assisted reproduction.

[3]  C. Benedetto,et al.  IVF results in patients with very low serum AMH are significantly affected by chronological age , 2016, Journal of Assisted Reproduction and Genetics.

[4]  R. Seufert,et al.  The influence of AMH on IVF success , 2016, Archives of Gynecology and Obstetrics.

[5]  S. Iliodromiti,et al.  Technical and performance characteristics of anti-Müllerian hormone and antral follicle count as biomarkers of ovarian response. , 2015, Human reproduction update.

[6]  D. Seifer,et al.  Assessing ovarian response: antral follicle count versus anti-Müllerian hormone. , 2015, Reproductive biomedicine online.

[7]  M. Lindstrom,et al.  Antimüllerian hormone as a predictor of good-quality supernumerary blastocyst cryopreservation among women with levels <1 ng/mL versus 1-4 ng/mL. , 2015, Fertility and sterility.

[8]  G. Aydın,et al.  Assessment of the relationship of basal serum anti-mullerian hormone levels with oocyte quality and pregnancy outcomes in patients undergoing ICSI , 2015, Iranian journal of reproductive medicine.

[9]  F. Stanczyk,et al.  Can highly sensitive antimüllerian hormone testing predict failed response to ovarian stimulation? , 2014, Fertility and sterility.

[10]  M. Eijkemans,et al.  Ovarian response prediction in GnRH antagonist treatment for IVF using anti-Müllerian hormone. , 2015, Human reproduction.

[11]  Z. Rosenwaks,et al.  Value of antimüllerian hormone as a prognostic indicator of in vitro fertilization outcome. , 2014, Fertility and sterility.

[12]  L. Nardo,et al.  The measurement of anti-Müllerian hormone: a critical appraisal. , 2014, The Journal of clinical endocrinology and metabolism.

[13]  A. La Marca,et al.  How Much Does AMH Really Vary in Normal Women? , 2013, International journal of endocrinology.

[14]  E. Anckaert,et al.  Does the time interval between antimüllerian hormone serum sampling and initiation of ovarian stimulation affect its predictive ability in in vitro fertilization-intracytoplasmic sperm injection cycles with a gonadotropin-releasing hormone antagonist? A retrospective single-center study. , 2013, Fertility and sterility.

[15]  B. Lunenfeld,et al.  Can anti-Müllerian hormone concentrations be used to determine gonadotrophin dose and treatment protocol for ovarian stimulation? , 2013, Reproductive biomedicine online.

[16]  S. Kōzuma,et al.  The significance of serum anti-Müllerian hormone (AMH) levels in patients over age 40 in first IVF treatment , 2013, Journal of Assisted Reproduction and Genetics.

[17]  Y. Hwu,et al.  The predictability of serum anti-Müllerian level in IVF/ICSI outcomes for patients of advanced reproductive age , 2011, Reproductive biology and endocrinology : RB&E.

[18]  N. Knowlton,et al.  Correlation of ovarian reserve tests with histologically determined primordial follicle number. , 2011, Fertility and sterility.

[19]  A. Volpe,et al.  Anti-Mullerian hormone (AMH) as a predictive marker in assisted reproductive technology (ART). , 2010, Human reproduction update.

[20]  F. Broekmans,et al.  Anti-Mullerian hormone (AMH): what do we still need to know? , 2009, Human reproduction.

[21]  M. C. Souza,et al.  Evaluation of two incubation environments--ISO class 8 versus ISO class 5--on intracytoplasmic sperm injection cycle outcome. , 2009, Fertility and sterility.

[22]  S. Nelson,et al.  Anti-Müllerian hormone-based approach to controlled ovarian stimulation for assisted conception. , 2008, Human reproduction.

[23]  F. Broekmans,et al.  Anti-Müllerian hormone and ovarian dysfunction , 2008, Trends in Endocrinology & Metabolism.

[24]  F. Broekmans,et al.  The accuracy of multivariate models predicting ovarian reserve and pregnancy after in vitro fertilization: a meta-analysis. , 2008, Human reproduction update.

[25]  P. Bischof,et al.  Undetectable serum anti-Müllerian hormone levels and occurrence of ongoing pregnancy. , 2008, Fertility and sterility.

[26]  R. Rey,et al.  Time course of the serum gonadotropin surge, inhibins, and anti-Müllerian hormone in normal newborn males during the first month of life. , 2006, The Journal of clinical endocrinology and metabolism.

[27]  A. Volpe,et al.  Anti‐Müllerian hormone (AMH) in female reproduction: is measurement of circulating AMH a useful tool? , 2006, Clinical endocrinology.

[28]  V. de Leo,et al.  Anti-Mullerian Hormone in Premenopausal Women and After Spontaneous or Surgically Induced Menopause , 2005, The Journal of the Society for Gynecologic Investigation: JSGI.

[29]  J. Visser,et al.  Anti-Müllerian hormone and folliculogenesis , 2005, Molecular and Cellular Endocrinology.

[30]  J. Habbema,et al.  Serum antimullerian hormone levels best reflect the reproductive decline with age in normal women with proven fertility: a longitudinal study. , 2005, Fertility and sterility.

[31]  D. Seifer,et al.  Serum antimüllerian hormone/müllerian-inhibiting substance appears to be a more discriminatory marker of assisted reproductive technology outcome than follicle-stimulating hormone, inhibin B, or estradiol. , 2004, Fertility and sterility.

[32]  D. Luton,et al.  Anti-Müllerian hormone levels in serum from human foetuses and children: pattern and clinical interest , 2003, Molecular and Cellular Endocrinology.

[33]  D. Seifer,et al.  Early follicular serum müllerian-inhibiting substance levels are associated with ovarian response during assisted reproductive technology cycles. , 2002, Fertility and sterility.