Rescue carotid puncture for ischemic stroke treated by endovascular therapy: a multicentric analysis and systematic review

Background Endovascular therapy (EVT) for acute ischemic stroke (AIS) can be challenging in older patients with supra-aortic tortuosity. Rescue carotid puncture (RCP) can be an alternative in case of supra-aortic catheterization failure by femoral access, but data regarding RCP are scarce. We sought to investigate the feasibility, effectiveness and safety of RCP for AIS treated by EVT. Methods Patients treated by EVT with RCP were included from January 2012 to December 2019 in the Endovascular Treatment in Ischemic Stroke (ETIS) multicentric registry. Main outcomes included reperfusion rates ( ≥ TICI2B), 3 month functional outcome (modified Rankin Scale) and 3 month mortality. We also performed an additional systematic review of the literature according to the PRISMA checklist to summarize previous studies on RCP. Results 25 patients treated by EVT with RCP were included from the ETIS registry. RCP mainly concerned elderly patients (median age 85 years, range 73–92) with supra-aortic tortuosity (n=16 (64%)). Intravenous thrombolysis (IVT) was used for nine patients (36%). Successful reperfusion was achieved in 64%, 87.5% of patients were dependent at 3 months, and 3 month mortality was 45.8%. The systematic review yielded comparable results. In pooled individual data, there was a shift toward better functional outcome in patients with successful reperfusion (median (IQR) 4 (2–6) vs 6 (4–6), p=0.011). Conclusion RCP mainly concerned elderly patients admitted for AIS with anterior LVO with supra-aortic tortuosity. The procedure seemed feasible, notably for patients treated with IVT, and led to significant reperfusion rates at the end of procedure, but with pronounced unfavorable outcomes at 3 months. RCP should be performed under general anesthesia to avoid life-threatening complications and ensure airways safety. Finally, RCP led to low rates of closure complications, emphasizing that this concern should not withhold RCP, if indicated.

[1]  S. Munich,et al.  Transradial approach for neurointerventions: a systematic review of the literature , 2020, Journal of NeuroInterventional Surgery.

[2]  S. Desai,et al.  Transradial versus transfemoral approaches for diagnostic cerebral angiography: a prospective, single-center, non-inferiority comparative effectiveness study , 2020, Journal of NeuroInterventional Surgery.

[3]  Correction to: Guidelines for the Early Management of Patients With Acute Ischemic Stroke: 2019 Update to the 2018 Guidelines for the Early Management of Acute Ischemic Stroke: A Guideline for Healthcare Professionals From the American Heart Association/American Stroke Association. , 2019, Stroke.

[4]  W. Powers,et al.  Guidelines for the Early Management of Patients With Acute Ischemic Stroke: 2019 Update to the 2018 Guidelines for the Early Management of Acute Ischemic Stroke: A Guideline for Healthcare Professionals From the American Heart Association/American Stroke Association. , 2019, Stroke.

[5]  Muke Zhou,et al.  Common carotid artery puncture in anterior circulation thrombectomy in patients with unfavorable vascular anatomy , 2019, Medicine.

[6]  L. Uhlmann,et al.  Association of General Anesthesia vs Procedural Sedation With Functional Outcome Among Patients With Acute Ischemic Stroke Undergoing Thrombectomy: A Systematic Review and Meta-analysis. , 2019, JAMA.

[7]  M. Mazighi,et al.  Impact of Reperfusion for Nonagenarians Treated by Mechanical Thrombectomy: Insights From the ETIS Registry. , 2019, Stroke.

[8]  M. Wiesmann,et al.  Combined surgical and endovascular carotid access for endovascular thrombectomy in acute ischemic stroke. , 2019, World neurosurgery.

[9]  H. Styczen,et al.  Alternative Transcarotid Approach for Endovascular Treatment of Acute Ischemic Stroke Patients: A Case Series , 2019, Neurointervention.

[10]  M. Mlynash,et al.  Thrombectomy for acute ischemic stroke in nonagenarians compared with octogenarians , 2019, Journal of NeuroInterventional Surgery.

[11]  J. Thornton,et al.  Direct carotid puncture for endovascular thrombectomy in acute ischemic stroke , 2019, Journal of NeuroInterventional Surgery.

[12]  Adrien Wang,et al.  Thrombectomy by direct cervical access in a case of common carotid occlusion with collateral supply to the Internal Carotid Artery: an uncommon anatomical variant. , 2019, World neurosurgery.

[13]  D. Yavagal,et al.  Transradial versus transfemoral access for anterior circulation mechanical thrombectomy: comparison of technical and clinical outcomes , 2019, Journal of NeuroInterventional Surgery.

[14]  J. Desilles,et al.  Gadolinium-Enhanced Extracranial MRA Prior to Mechanical Thrombectomy Is Not Associated With an Improved Procedure Speed , 2019, Front. Neurol..

[15]  K. Houkin,et al.  Direct common carotid artery puncture for acute thrombectomy against ischemic stroke. , 2018, Journal of neurosurgical sciences.

[16]  P. Mordasini,et al.  Reasons for Reperfusion Failures in Stent-Retriever-Based Thrombectomy: Registry Analysis and Proposal of a Classification System , 2018, American Journal of Neuroradiology.

[17]  Sumit Roy,et al.  Transcarotid Endovascular Thrombectomy for Acute Ischemic Stroke. , 2018, Journal of vascular and interventional radiology : JVIR.

[18]  M. Mazighi,et al.  Predictors of favorable outcome after mechanical thrombectomy for anterior circulation acute ischemic stroke in octogenarians. , 2018, Journal of neuroradiology. Journal de neuroradiologie.

[19]  T. Dumont,et al.  Difficult Vascular Access Anatomy Associated with Decreased Success of Revascularization in Emergent Thrombectomy. , 2018, Journal of vascular and interventional neurology.

[20]  P. Brennan,et al.  Direct Common Carotid Artery Puncture for Endovascular Treatment of Acute Large Vessel Ischemic Stroke in a Patient with Aortic Coarctation. , 2017, Journal of stroke and cerebrovascular diseases : the official journal of National Stroke Association.

[21]  M. Cilingiroglu,et al.  Direct carotid access for endovascular management of acute ischaemic stroke. , 2017, EuroIntervention : journal of EuroPCR in collaboration with the Working Group on Interventional Cardiology of the European Society of Cardiology.

[22]  M. Wiesmann,et al.  Influence of carotid tortuosity on internal carotid artery access time in the treatment of acute ischemic stroke , 2017, Interventional neuroradiology : journal of peritherapeutic neuroradiology, surgical procedures and related neurosciences.

[23]  M. Mazighi,et al.  Effect of Endovascular Contact Aspiration vs Stent Retriever on Revascularization in Patients With Acute Ischemic Stroke and Large Vessel Occlusion: The ASTER Randomized Clinical Trial , 2017, JAMA.

[24]  Adnan H Siddiqui,et al.  Time to Treatment With Endovascular Thrombectomy and Outcomes From Ischemic Stroke: A Meta-analysis. , 2016, JAMA.

[25]  A. Demchuk,et al.  Endovascular thrombectomy after large-vessel ischaemic stroke: a meta-analysis of individual patient data from five randomised trials , 2016, The Lancet.

[26]  M. Hernández-Pérez,et al.  Mechanical thrombectomy with ‘ADAPT’ technique by transcervical access in acute ischemic stroke , 2015, The neuroradiology journal.

[27]  M. Wiesmann,et al.  Feasibility of combined surgical and endovascular carotid access for interventional treatment of ischemic stroke , 2015, Journal of NeuroInterventional Surgery.

[28]  A. Jadhav,et al.  Transcervical access in acute ischemic stroke , 2013, Journal of NeuroInterventional Surgery.

[29]  A. Qureshi,et al.  Microcatheter to Recanalization (Procedure Time) Predicts Outcomes in Endovascular Treatment in Patients with Acute Ischemic Stroke: When Do We Stop? , 2013, American Journal of Neuroradiology.

[30]  C. Molina,et al.  Difficult catheter access to the occluded vessel during endovascular treatment of acute ischemic stroke is associated with worse clinical outcome , 2012, Journal of NeuroInterventional Surgery.

[31]  J. Gomori,et al.  A reappraisal of the common carotid artery as an access site in interventional procedures for acute stroke therapies , 2012, Journal of Clinical Neuroscience.

[32]  P. Lin,et al.  Access site management with vascular closure devices for percutaneous transarterial procedures. , 2010, Journal of vascular surgery.

[33]  H. Jneid,et al.  Arteriotomy Closure Devices for Cardiovascular Procedures: A Scientific Statement From the American Heart Association , 2010, Circulation.

[34]  D. Moher,et al.  Preferred reporting items for systematic reviews and meta-analyses: the PRISMA statement. , 2009, Journal of clinical epidemiology.

[35]  J. Sadik,et al.  Hemostatic closure device after carotid puncture for stent and coil placement in an intracranial aneurysm: technical note. , 2002, AJNR. American journal of neuroradiology.