Self-Monitoring and the Attitude-Behavior Relation

It has been suggested that self-monitoring moderates attitude-behavior relations by influencing the perceived relevance of attitudes as guides for action. To test an alternative interpretation, 155 male and female college students responded to three questionnaires over a 6-week period before and after the 1980 presidential election. The questionnaires assessed self-monitoring tendency, attitudes and intentions with respect to voting in the election and with respect to smoking marijuana over a 3-week period, and self-reports of actual behavior. As in previous studies, low self-monitors tended to exhibit stronger attitude-behavior correlations than high self-monitors. There was, however, no difference in the predictability of intentions from attitudes, a finding which discontinued the preceived relevance interpretation of the effect of self-monitoring. Instead, the difference was located in the relation between intentions and behavior; low self-monitors exhibited significantly stronger intention-behavior correlations than did high selfmonitors. These findings supported the alternative interpretation, according to which the two types of individuals are equally aware of their attitudes' action implications; however, high self-monitors, being sensitive to situational demands, are less likely to carry out their previously formed intentions than are low selfmonitors, who are more attentive to internal cues. Research on the relationship between attitudes and behavior has undergone a marked shift of focus in recent years. Attitudes are no longer expected to predict behavior unconditionally; instead, their relation to behavior is said to be moderated by other variables. The strength of attitude-behavior relations is assumed to be contingent on a variety of factors, including the judged influence of extraneous events (Wicker, 1971), direct experience with the attitude object or with the behavior (Fazio & Zanna, 1978a; Regan & Fazio, 1977), confidence with which the attitude is held (Fazio & Zanna, 1978b), internal consistency of the attitude (Norman, 1975), heightened self-awareness (Wicklund, in press), and such individual difference variables as self-monitoring (Snyder, 1974, in press) and self-consciousness (Scheier, 1980; Scheier, Buss, & Buss, 1978).

[1]  G. Gurin,et al.  The Voter Decides , 1954 .

[2]  P. Converse,et al.  The American voter , 1960 .

[3]  John P. Robinson,et al.  Measures of political attitudes , 1970 .

[4]  Leonard Berkowitz,et al.  THE TRADITIONAL SOCIALLY RESPONSIBLE PERSONALITY , 1968 .

[5]  A. W. Wicker.  An examination of the "other variables" explanation of attitude-behavior inconsistency. , 1971 .

[6]  D. Baer.  Attitudes about Marijuana and Political Views , 1973, Psychological reports.

[7]  I. Ajzen,et al.  Attitudinal and normative variables as predictors of specific behavior. , 1973 .

[8]  G. Fisher.  Milieu of Marihuana Use , 1974, The International journal of social psychiatry.

[9]  M. Snyder.  Self-monitoring of expressive behavior. , 1974 .

[10]  M. Scheier,et al.  Public and private self-consciousness: Assessment and theory. , 1975 .

[11]  R. Norman,et al.  Affective-cognitive consistency, attitudes, conformity, and behavior. , 1975 .

[12]  Mark Snyder,et al.  When actions reflect attitudes: The politics of impression management , 1976 .

[13]  I. Ajzen,et al.  Attitude-behavior relations: A theoretical analysis and review of empirical research. , 1977 .

[14]  Russell H. Fazio,et al.  On the consistency between attitudes and behavior: Look to the method of attitude formation , 1977 .

[15]  I. Ajzen,et al.  Belief, Attitude, Intention, and Behavior: An Introduction to Theory and Research , 1977 .

[16]  M. Zanna,et al.  Attitudinal qualities relating to the strength of the attitude-behavior relationship☆ , 1978 .

[17]  Arnold H. Buss,et al.  Self-consciousness, self-report of aggressiveness, and aggression , 1978 .

[18]  M. Zanna,et al.  On the predictive validity of attitudes: The roles of direct experience and confidence1 , 1978 .

[19]  Harry T. Reis,et al.  Comparison of Three Models for Predicting Altruistic Behavior. , 1978 .

[20]  M. Snyder.  Self-monitoring processes , 1979 .

[21]  I. Ajzen,et al.  Understanding Attitudes and Predicting Social Behavior , 1980 .

[22]  M. Zanna,et al.  Attitude–behavior consistency: An individual difference perspective. , 1980 .

[23]  Michael F. Scheier,et al.  Effects of public and private self-consciousness on the public expression of personal beliefs , 1980 .