Measuring Factors that Influence the Success of Internet Commerce

Efforts to develop measures of Internet commerce success have been hampered by (1) the rapid development and use of Internet technologies and (2) the lack of conceptual bases necessary to develop success measures. In a recent study, Keeney (1999) proposed two sets of variables labeled asmeans objectives andfundamental objectives that influence Internet shopping. Means objectives, he argues, help businesses achieve what is important for their customers--fundamental objectives. Based on Keeney's work, this paper describes the development of two instruments that together measure the factors that influence Internet commerce success. One instrument measures the means objectives that influence online purchase (e.g., Internet vendor trust) and the other measures the fundamental objectives that customers perceive to be important for Internet commerce (e.g., Internet product value). In phase one of the instrument development process, we generated 125 items for means and fundamental objectives. Using a sample of 199 responses by individuals with Internet shopping experience, these constructs were examined for reliability and validity. The Phase 1 results suggested a 4-factor, 21-item instrument to measure means objectives and a 4-factor, 17-item instrument to measure fundamental objectives. In Phase 2 of the instrument development process, we gathered a sample of 421 responses to further explore the 2 instruments. With minor modifications, the Phase 2 data support the 2 models. The Phase 2 results suggest a 5-factor, 21-item instrument that measures means objectives in terms ofInternet product choice, online payment, Internet vendor trust, shopping travel, andInternet shipping errors. Results also suggest a 4-factor, 16-item instrument that measures fundamental objectives in terms ofInternet shopping convenience, Internet ecology, Internet customer relation, andInternet product value. Evidence of reliability and discriminant, construct, and content validity is presented for the hypothesized measurement models. The paper concludes with discussions on the usefulness of these measures and future research ideas.

[1]  Detmar W. Straub,et al.  Research Commentary: Transformational Issues in Researching IS and Net-Enabled Organizations , 2001, Inf. Syst. Res..

[2]  Wanda J. Orlikowski,et al.  Research Commentary: Desperately Seeking the "IT" in IT Research - A Call to Theorizing the IT Artifact , 2001, Inf. Syst. Res..

[3]  Detmar W. Straub,et al.  Validation in Information Systems Research: A State-of-the-Art Assessment , 2001, MIS Q..

[4]  Detmar W. Straub,et al.  The Relative Importance of Perceived Ease of Use in IS Adoption: A Study of E-Commerce Adoption , 2000, J. Assoc. Inf. Syst..

[5]  Robert W. Zmud,et al.  Research Commentary: The Organizing Logic for an Enterprise's IT Activities in the Digital Era - A Prognosis of Practice and a Call for Research , 2000, Inf. Syst. Res..

[6]  León.  Value-Focused Thinking versus Alternative-Focused Thinking: Effects on Generation of Objectives. , 1999, Organizational behavior and human decision processes.

[7]  W. Doll,et al.  The development of a tool for measuring the perceived impact of information technology on work , 1999 .

[8]  R. Keeney,et al.  The Value of Internet Commerce to the Customer , 1999 .

[9]  Frederick J. Riggins,et al.  Toward a unified view of electronic commerce , 1998, CACM.

[10]  Lorin M. Hitt,et al.  Beyond the productivity paradox , 1998, CACM.

[11]  Albert H. Segars,et al.  Assessing the unidimensionality of measurement : a paradigm and illustration within the context of information systems research , 1997 .

[12]  William J. Doll,et al.  A Confirmatory Factor Analysis of the End-User Computing Satisfaction Instrument , 1994, MIS Q..

[13]  Izak Benbasat,et al.  Development of an Instrument to Measure the Perceptions of Adopting an Information Technology Innovation , 1991, Inf. Syst. Res..

[14]  Detmar W. Straub,et al.  Information technologies for the 1990s: an organizational impact perspective , 1989, CACM.

[15]  Detmar W. Straub,et al.  Validating Instruments in MIS Research , 1989, MIS Q..

[16]  William J. Doll,et al.  The Measurement of End-User Computing Satisfaction , 1988, MIS Q..

[17]  Duane Davis,et al.  Business research for decision making , 1985 .

[18]  R. Bagozzi.  An Examination Of The Validity Of Two Models Of Attitude. , 1981, Multivariate behavioral research.

[19]  Donald R. Cooper,et al.  Business Research Methods , 1980 .

[20]  Gilbert A. Churchill.  A Paradigm for Developing Better Measures of Marketing Constructs , 1979 .

[21]  Jeffrey P. Krischer,et al.  Utility Structure of a Medical Decision-Making Problem , 1976, Oper. Res..

[22]  Howard B. Lee,et al.  Foundations of Behavioral Research , 1973 .

[23]  David J. Weiss,et al.  Factor Analysis and Counseling Research. , 1970 .

[24]  D. Campbell,et al.  Convergent and discriminant validation by the multitrait-multimethod matrix. , 1959, Psychological bulletin.