Femoro‐tibial cartilage metrics from coronal MR image data: Technique, test–retest reproducibility, and findings in osteoarthritis

MRI‐based measures of cartilage morphology are being increasingly used as surrogate markers in osteoarthritis. In contrast to other knee joint surfaces, quantitative analysis of the femoral condyles from sagittal MRI suffers from limited precision. The objective, therefore, was to develop a technique for reproducible assessment of femoral cartilage morphology from coronal image data. Coronal MR images (3D T1‐w FLASHwe) of the knee were obtained in 16 healthy volunteers and in 7 patients with severe osteoarthritis (OA, prior to knee arthroplasty), with repositioning between repeated scans. After segmentation the cartilage volume, thickness, and joint surface areas were quantified in the tibia and in an anatomically defined region of the femoral condyle. Immediate test‐retest interscan precision errors (CV%) for femoral cartilage volume were 3.0% (SD = 26 μl) and 3.2% (29 μl) medially and laterally in volunteers, and 3.0% (34 μl) and 7.0% (37 μl) in OA patients. The estimated loss, from cross sectional data, in the patients in the medial femoral condyle (–61%/–4.4 SD) was higher than that in the medial tibia (–45%/–3.1 SD) and compared favorably with precision errors (ratio > 16:1). The technique proposed overcomes some of the problems associated with sagittal scans and thus shows high promise for reliable assessment of femoro‐tibial cartilage loss in OA. Magn Reson Med 50:1229–1236, 2003. © 2003 Wiley‐Liss, Inc.

[1]  F. Cicuttini,et al.  The determinants of change in patella cartilage volume in osteoarthritic knees. , 2002, The Journal of rheumatology.

[2]  T Stammberger,et al.  Validation of high-resolution water-excitation magnetic resonance imaging for quantitative assessment of thin cartilage layers. , 2000, Osteoarthritis and cartilage.

[3]  F. Cicuttini,et al.  Tibial and femoral cartilage changes in knee osteoarthritis , 2001, Annals of the rheumatic diseases.

[4]  J. Beary Joint structure modification in osteoarthritis: Development of SMOAD drugs , 2001, Current rheumatology reports.

[5]  H K Genant,et al.  Emerging applications of magnetic resonance imaging in the evaluation of articular cartilage. , 1996, Radiologic clinics of North America.

[6]  P A Dieppe,et al.  No loss of cartilage volume over three years in patients with knee osteoarthritis as assessed by magnetic resonance imaging. , 2002, Osteoarthritis and cartilage.

[7]  F Eckstein,et al.  In vivo reproducibility of three-dimensional cartilage volume and thickness measurements with MR imaging. , 1998, AJR. American journal of roentgenology.

[8]  Trevor Hastie,et al.  Risk factors for progressive cartilage loss in the knee: a longitudinal magnetic resonance imaging study in forty-three patients. , 2002, Arthritis and rheumatism.

[9]  R. Burgkart,et al.  Precision of tibial cartilage morphometry with a coronal water-excitation MR sequence , 2000, European Radiology.

[10]  Maximilian Reiser,et al.  Surface size, curvature analysis, and assessment of knee joint incongruity with MRI in vivo , 2002, Magnetic resonance in medicine.

[11]  Z A C,et al.  Knee cartilage topography , thickness , and contact areas from MRI : in-vitro calibration and in-vivo measurements , 1999 .

[12]  R Burgkart,et al.  Long-term and resegmentation precision of quantitative cartilage MR imaging (qMRI). , 2002, Osteoarthritis and cartilage.

[13]  John F. BearyIII Joint structure modification in osteoarthritis: development of SMOAD drugs. , 2001 .

[14]  E. Vignon,et al.  Radiographic assessment of hip and knee osteoarthritis. Recommendations: recommended guidelines. , 1999, Osteoarthritis and cartilage.

[15]  Maximilian Reiser,et al.  In vivo morphometry and functional analysis of human articular cartilage with quantitative magnetic resonance imaging – from image to data, from data to theory , 2001, Anatomy and Embryology.

[16]  T. Stammberger,et al.  Patellar cartilage deformation in vivo after static versus dynamic loading. , 2000, Journal of biomechanics.

[17]  J. Lynch,et al.  Joint space width measures cartilage thickness in osteoarthritis of the knee: high resolution plain film and double contrast macroradiographic investigation. , 1995, Annals of the rheumatic diseases.

[18]  M. Jergas,et al.  Accurate assessment of precision errors: How to measure the reproducibility of bone densitometry techniques , 2005, Osteoporosis International.

[19]  H. Genant,et al.  Accuracy of T2-weighted fast spin-echo MR imaging with fat saturation in detecting cartilage defects in the knee: comparison with arthroscopy in 130 patients. , 1999, AJR. American journal of roentgenology.

[20]  Buckland-Wright Radiographic assessment of osteoarthritis: comparison between existing methodologies. , 1999, Osteoarthritis and cartilage.

[21]  F. Cicuttini,et al.  The determinants of change in tibial cartilage volume in osteoarthritic knees. , 2002, Arthritis and rheumatism.

[22]  T. Stammberger,et al.  Determination of 3D cartilage thickness data from MR imaging: Computational method and reproducibility in the living , 1999, Magnetic resonance in medicine.

[23]  S. Majumdar,et al.  Noninvasive assessment of bone mineral and structure: State of the art , 1996, Journal of bone and mineral research : the official journal of the American Society for Bone and Mineral Research.

[24]  S. Eustace,et al.  Contribution of meniscal extrusion and cartilage loss to joint space narrowing in osteoarthritis. , 1999, Clinical radiology.

[25]  R. Putz,et al.  Determination of knee joint cartilage thickness using three‐dimensional magnetic resonance chondro‐crassometry (3D MR‐CCM) , 1996, Magnetic resonance in medicine.

[26]  T Stammberger,et al.  Optimization and validation of a rapid high-resolution T1-w 3D FLASH water excitation MRI sequence for the quantitative assessment of articular cartilage volume and thickness. , 2001, Magnetic resonance imaging.

[27]  T Stammberger,et al.  Interobserver reproducibility of quantitative cartilage measurements: comparison of B-spline snakes and manual segmentation. , 1999, Magnetic resonance imaging.

[28]  E. Yelin,et al.  Special article the economic cost and social and psychological impact of musculoskeletal conditions , 1995 .

[29]  F. Cicuttini,et al.  Comparison and reproducibility of fast and conventional spoiled gradient‐echo magnetic resonance sequences in the determination of knee cartilage volume , 2000, Journal of orthopaedic research : official publication of the Orthopaedic Research Society.

[30]  F Eckstein,et al.  Magnetic resonance chondro‐crassometry (MR CCM): A method for accurate determination of articular cartilace thickness? , 1996, Magnetic resonance in medicine.

[31]  E. Vignon,et al.  Which is the best radiographic protocol for a clinical trial of a structure modifying drug in patients with knee osteoarthritis? , 2002, The Journal of rheumatology.

[32]  G A Ateshian,et al.  Knee cartilage topography, thickness, and contact areas from MRI: in-vitro calibration and in-vivo measurements. , 1999, Osteoarthritis and cartilage.

[33]  F Eckstein,et al.  Accuracy of cartilage volume and thickness measurements with magnetic resonance imaging. , 1998, Clinical orthopaedics and related research.

[34]  D. Felson,et al.  Meniscal subluxation: association with osteoarthritis and joint space narrowing. , 1999, Osteoarthritis and cartilage.

[35]  R Burgkart,et al.  Feasibility of T and Z scores from magnetic resonance imaging data for quantification of cartilage loss in osteoarthritis. , 2003, Arthritis and rheumatism.

[36]  T. Stammberger,et al.  Effect of gradient and section orientation on quantitative analysis of knee joint cartilage , 2000, Journal of magnetic resonance imaging : JMRI.

[37]  R Burgkart,et al.  Magnetic resonance imaging-based assessment of cartilage loss in severe osteoarthritis: accuracy, precision, and diagnostic value. , 2001, Arthritis and rheumatism.

[38]  C C Glüer,et al.  Quantification of articular cartilage in the knee with pulsed saturation transfer subtraction and fat-suppressed MR imaging: optimization and validation. , 1994, Radiology.

[39]  F. Cicuttini,et al.  Supplementary vitamin E does not affect the loss of cartilage volume in knee osteoarthritis: a 2 year double blind randomized placebo controlled study. , 2002, The Journal of rheumatology.