Cotinine Concentration in Smokers from Different Countries: Relationship with Amount Smoked and Cigarette Type

This four-country study examined salivary cotinine as a marker for nicotine intake and addiction among smokers in relation to numbers and types of cigarettes smoked. Smoking characteristics of cigarette smokers in Brazil, China, Mexico, and Poland were identified using a standard questionnaire. Cotinine concentration was measured using a saliva sample from each participant; its relationship with numbers and types of cigarettes smoked was quantified by applying regression techniques. The main outcome measure was salivary cotinine level measured by gas chromatography. In all four countries, cotinine concentration increased linearly with cigarettes smoked up to 20 per day [11.3 ng/mL (95% confidence interval, 10.5-12.2)] and then stabilized as the number of cigarettes exceeded 20 [6.8 ng/mL per cigarette (95% confidence interval, 6.3-7.4) for up to 40 cigarettes]. On average, smokers of regular cigarettes consumed more cigarettes and had higher cotinine levels than light cigarette smokers. Cotinine concentration per cigarette smoked did not differ between regular and light cigarette smokers. Results suggest a saturation point for daily nicotine intake and minimal or no reduction in nicotine intake by smoking light cigarettes. (Cancer Epidemiol Biomarkers Prev 2006;15(10):1799–804)

[1]  D. Hammond,et al.  Secret science: tobacco industry research on smoking behaviour and cigarette toxicity , 2006, The Lancet.

[2]  Deirdre Lawrence,et al.  Methods to assess potential reduced exposure products. , 2005, Nicotine & tobacco research : official journal of the Society for Research on Nicotine and Tobacco.

[3]  J. Samet,et al.  Determinants of salivary cotinine levels among current smokers in Mexico. , 2004, Nicotine & tobacco research : official journal of the Society for Research on Nicotine and Tobacco.

[4]  J. Samet,et al.  Determinants of salivary cotinine concentrations in Chinese male smokers. , 2003, Preventive medicine.

[5]  Disease Prevention Clearing the Smoke : Assessing the Science Base for Tobacco Harm Reduction , 2001 .

[6]  M. Jarvis,et al.  Nicotine yield from machine-smoked cigarettes and nicotine intakes in smokers: evidence from a representative population survey. , 2001, Journal of the National Cancer Institute.

[7]  N. Harrison,et al.  Textbook of Prostate Cancer: Pathology, Diagnosis and Treatment , 2000, BMJ : British Medical Journal.

[8]  J. Samet,et al.  Smoking in China: findings of the 1996 National Prevalence Survey. , 1999, JAMA.

[9]  Karl Fagerstrom,et al.  Measuring nicotine dependence: A review of the Fagerstrom Tolerance Questionnaire , 1989, Journal of Behavioral Medicine.

[10]  N. Benowitz,et al.  Improved gas chromatographic method for the determination of nicotine and cotinine in biologic fluids. , 1981, Journal of chromatography.

[11]  M. Thun,et al.  Tobacco smoke and involuntary smoking. , 2004, IARC monographs on the evaluation of carcinogenic risks to humans.

[12]  J. Henningfield,et al.  Tobacco and public health : science and policy , 2004 .

[13]  G. Guindon,et al.  Tobacco control country profiles , 2003 .

[14]  M. Corrao Tobacco control country profiles , 2000 .

[15]  D. Shopland The FTC cigarette test method for determining tar, nicotine, and carbon monoxide yields of U.S. cigarettes / , 1996 .

[16]  E. Somers International Agency for Research on Cancer. , 1985, CMAJ : Canadian Medical Association journal = journal de l'Association medicale canadienne.