Intentional behaviour in dog-human communication: an experimental analysis of “showing” behaviour in the dog

Abstract Despite earlier scepticism there is now evidence for simple forms of intentional and functionally referential communication in many animal species. Here we investigate whether dogs engage in functional referential communication with their owners. “Showing” is defined as a communicative action consisting of both a directional component related to an external target and an attention-getting component that directs the attention of the perceiver to the informer or sender. In our experimental situation dogs witness the hiding of a piece of food (or a favourite toy) which they cannot get access to. We asked whether dogs would engage in “showing” in the presence of their owner. To control for the motivational effects of both the owner and the food on the dogs’ behaviour, control observations were also staged where only the food (or the toy) or the owner was present. Dogs’ gazing frequency at both the food (toy) and the owner was greater when only one of these was present. In other words, dogs looked more frequently at their owner when the food (toy) was present, and they looked more at the location of the food (toy) when the owner was present. When both the food (toy) and the owner were present a new behaviour, “gaze alternation”, emerged which was defined as changing the direction of the gaze from the location of the food (toy) to looking at the owner (or vice versa) within 2 s. Vocalisations that occurred in this phase were always associated with gazing at the owner or the location of the food. This behaviour, which was specific to this situation, has also been described in chimpanzees, a gorilla and humans, and has often been interpreted as a form of functionally referential communication. Based on our observations we argue that dogs might be able to engage in functionally referential communication with their owner, and their behaviour could be described as a form of “showing”. The contribution of domestication and individual learning to the well-developed communicative skills in dogs is discussed and will be the subject of further studies.

[1]  M. Tomasello,et al.  Chimpanzees know what conspecifics do and do not see , 2000, Animal Behaviour.

[2]  J. E. Rice,et al.  Multiple and ancient origins of the domestic dog. , 1997, Science.

[3]  Á. Miklósi,et al.  Use of experimenter-given cues in dogs , 1998, Animal Cognition.

[4]  Philip Smith.  Roger Bakeman John M. Gottman , 1987, Animal Behaviour.

[5]  M. Tomasello,et al.  Communication of Food Location Between Human and Dog ( Canis Familiaris ) , 1998 .

[6]  P. Marler,et al.  Rhesus monkey (Macaca mulatta) screams: Representational signalling in the recruitment of agonistic aid , 1984, Animal Behaviour.

[7]  L B Adamson,et al.  Social referencing by young chimpanzees (Pan troglodytes). , 1997, Journal of comparative psychology.

[8]  Alison S. Garton.  Nonverbal vocal communication: Comparative and developmental approaches , 1993 .

[9]  M. Tomasello,et al.  The development of gestural communication in young chimpanzees , 1985 .

[10]  Daniel J. Povinelli,et al.  Exploitation of pointing as a referential gesture in young children, but not adolescent chimpanzees , 1997 .

[11]  M. Tomasello,et al.  Domestic Dogs (Canis familiaris) Use Human and Conspecific Social Cues to Locate Hidden Food , 1999 .

[12]  Kim A. Bard,et al.  Reaching into Thought: The Minds of the Great Apes , 1999 .

[13]  E. Bates,et al.  The emergence of intentional communication , 1979 .

[14]  S. Baron-Cohen,et al.  Treating people as objects, agents, or "subjects": how young children with and without autism make requests. , 1995, Journal of child psychology and psychiatry, and allied disciplines.

[15]  Elizabeth Bates,et al.  Language and Context , 1976 .

[16]  G. Butterworth,et al.  What minds have in common is space : Spatial mechanisms serving joint visual attention in infancy , 1991 .

[17]  W. Köhler.  The mentality of apes, 1917. , 1948 .

[18]  C. Boesch,et al.  Hunting behavior of wild chimpanzees in the Taï National Park. , 1989, American journal of physical anthropology.

[19]  G. Butterworth,et al.  How the eyes, head and hand serve definite reference , 2000 .

[20]  Christopher S. Evans,et al.  Referential Signals , 2000 .

[21]  Elizabeth Bates,et al.  The Acquisition of Performatives Prior to Speech. , 1975 .

[22]  D. Povinelli,et al.  What young chimpanzees know about seeing. , 2000, Monographs of the Society for Research in Child Development.

[23]  M. Tomasello.  Joint attention as social cognition. , 1995 .

[24]  J. Gomez.  Non-human primate theories of (non-human primate) minds: some issues concerning the origins of mind-reading , 1996 .

[25]  Juan Carlos Gómez,et al.  “Language” and intelligence in monkeys and apes: The emergence of intentional communication as a problem-solving strategy in the gorilla , 1990 .

[26]  P. Marler,et al.  Food calling and audience effects in male chickens, Gallus gallus: their relationships to food availability, courtship and social facilitation , 1994, Animal Behaviour.

[27]  Juan Carlos Gómez,et al.  Self-awareness in animals and humans: Mutual awareness in primate communication: A Gricean approach , 1994 .

[28]  R. Seyfarth,et al.  How Monkeys See the World , 1990 .

[29]  M. Bekoff.  Social play and play-soliciting by infant canids , 1974 .

[30]  MICHAEL TOMASELLO,et al.  Five primate species follow the visual gaze of conspecifics , 1998, Animal Behaviour.

[31]  P. Mundy,et al.  Defining the social deficits of autism: the contribution of non-verbal communication measures. , 1986, Journal of child psychology and psychiatry, and allied disciplines.

[32]  Juan Carlos Gómez,et al.  Ostensive behavior in great apes: The role of eye contact. , 1996 .

[33]  Thomas D. Sambrook,et al.  Use of human-given cues by domestic dogs (Canis familiaris) and horses (Equus caballus) , 2000, Animal Cognition.

[34]  K. Frisch.  The dance language and orientation of bees , 1967 .