Telehealth

AmeriHealth Caritas has developed clinical policies to assist with making coverage determinations. AmeriHealth Caritas’ clinical policies are based on guidelines from established industry sources, such as the Centers for Medicare & Medicaid Services (CMS), state regulatory agencies, the American Medical Association (AMA), medical specialty professional societies, and peer-reviewed professional literature. These clinical policies along with other sources, such as plan benefits and state and federal laws and regulatory requirements, including any stateor plan-specific definition of “medically necessary,” and the specific facts of the particular situation are considered by AmeriHealth Caritas when making coverage determinations. In the event of conflict between this clinical policy and plan benefits and/or state or federal laws and/or regulatory requirements, the plan benefits and/or state and federal laws and/or regulatory requirements shall control. AmeriHealth Caritas’ clinical policies are for informational purposes only and not intended as medical advice or to direct treatment. Physicians and other health care providers are solely responsible for the treatment decisions for their patients. AmeriHealth Caritas’ clinical policies are reflective of evidence-based medicine at the time of review. As medical science evolves, AmeriHealth Caritas will update its clinical policies as necessary. AmeriHealth Caritas’ clinical policies are not guarantees of payment.

[1]  C. Kruse,et al.  Telehealth and patient satisfaction: a systematic review and narrative analysis , 2017, BMJ Open.

[2]  Yinping Wang,et al.  Effectiveness of e-health based self-management to improve cancer-related fatigue, self-efficacy and quality of life in cancer patients: systematic review and meta-analysis. , 2019, Journal of advanced nursing.

[3]  L. Thabane,et al.  The Use and Effects of Electronic Health Tools for Patient Self-Monitoring and Reporting of Outcomes Following Medication Use: Systematic Review , 2018, Journal of medical Internet research.

[4]  C. Sicotte,et al.  Impact of Synchronous Telemedicine Models on Clinical Outcomes in Pediatric Acute Care Settings: A Systematic Review* , 2018, Pediatric critical care medicine : a journal of the Society of Critical Care Medicine and the World Federation of Pediatric Intensive and Critical Care Societies.

[5]  T. Wykes,et al.  Barriers to and Facilitators of Engagement With Remote Measurement Technology for Managing Health: Systematic Review and Content Analysis of Findings , 2018, Journal of medical Internet research.

[6]  Andrew S. Winburn,et al.  A systematic review of prehospital telehealth utilization , 2017, Journal of telemedicine and telecare.

[7]  Elizabeth A. Krupinski,et al.  Standards and Guidelines in Telemedicine and Telehealth , 2014, Healthcare.

[8]  Nai-Yuan Wu,et al.  The effectiveness of telemedicine on body mass index: A systematic review and meta-analysis , 2018, Journal of telemedicine and telecare.

[9]  Matthew Brooks,et al.  Evaluating barriers to adopting telemedicine worldwide: A systematic review , 2016, Journal of telemedicine and telecare.

[10]  M. Clark,et al.  Evidence for telehealth group-based treatment: A systematic review , 2019, Journal of telemedicine and telecare.

[11]  J. Chen,et al.  Clinical and Economic Outcomes of Telemedicine Programs in the Intensive Care Unit: A Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis , 2018, Journal of intensive care medicine.

[12]  Jiwon Oh,et al.  Effects of Remote Monitoring of Blood Pressure in Management of Urban Hypertensive Patients: A Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis. , 2020, Telemedicine journal and e-health : the official journal of the American Telemedicine Association.

[13]  Sung-joon Min,et al.  Using telehealth to provide diabetes care to patients in rural Montana: findings from the promoting realistic individual self-management program. , 2011, Telemedicine journal and e-health : the official journal of the American Telemedicine Association.

[14]  Robert Janke,et al.  The efficacy of telehealth delivered educational approaches for patients with chronic diseases: A systematic review. , 2018, Patient education and counseling.

[15]  R. Ray,et al.  Use of telehealth in the management of non-critical emergencies in rural or remote emergency departments: A systematic review , 2017, Journal of telemedicine and telecare.

[16]  Alison Bowes,et al.  Effectiveness of telemedicine: A systematic review of reviews , 2010, Int. J. Medical Informatics.

[17]  Jennifer F. Reiner,et al.  Systematic Review of School Telehealth Evaluations , 2018, The Journal of school nursing : the official publication of the National Association of School Nurses.