Simulated watershed mercury and nitrate flux responses to multiple land cover conversion scenarios

Water quality and toxic exposure science is transitioning towards analysis of multiple stressors rather than one particular environmental concern (e.g., mercury) or a group of similarly reacting chemicals (e.g., nutrients). However, two of the most important water quality constituents affecting both human and ecosystem health today, reactive nitrogen (N(r) ) and methylmercury (MeHg), are often assessed separately for their independent effects on water quality. With the continued pressure of landscape modifications on water quality, a challenge remains in understanding the concurrent watershed flux response of both N(r) and MeHg to such physical stressors, particularly at the spatial scale (regional watersheds) and within the mixed land cover type systems that most decision-making processes are conducted. We simulate the annual average and monthly flux responses of Hg (MeHg and total mercury [HgT]), NO(3) -N, and runoff to four land cover change scenarios in the Haw River Watershed (NC, USA), a headwater system in the Cape Fear River Basin. Fluxes are simulated using a process-based, spatially explicit watershed Grid-Based Mercury Model (GBMM) and a NO(3) -N watershed flux model we developed to link to GBMM. Results suggest that annual NO(3) -N and Hg fluxes increase and decrease concomitantly to land cover change; however, the magnitude of the changes in NO(3) -N, MeHg, HgT, and water fluxes vary considerably between different land cover conversion scenarios. Converting pasture land to a suburbanized landscape elicited the greatest increase in runoff and MeHg, HgT, and NO(3) -N fluxes among all four conversion scenarios. Our findings provide insight for multi-stressor ecological exposure research and management of coastal eutrophication resulting from elevated N(r) loadings and exposure risk due to elevated concentrations of MeHg in fish tissue.

[1]  Robin L. Dennis,et al.  Linking air quality and watershed models for environmental assessments: Analysis of the effects of model-specific precipitation estimates on calculated water flux , 2010, Environ. Model. Softw..

[2]  M. B. Beck,et al.  GRAND CHALLENGES OF THE FUTURE FOR ENVIRONMENTAL MODELING , 2008 .

[3]  Jeffrey G. Arnold,et al.  Soil and Water Assessment Tool Theoretical Documentation Version 2009 , 2011 .

[4]  Lawrence E. Band,et al.  Exploring functional similarity in the export of Nitrate‐N from forested catchments: A mechanistic modeling approach , 1998 .

[5]  Dennis P. Swaney,et al.  Long-Term Nitrate Export Pattern from Hubbard Brook Watershed 6 Driven by Climatic Variation , 2005 .

[6]  Brent M. Troutman,et al.  Regression models for estimating urban storm-runoff quality and quantity in the United States , 1989 .

[7]  M. Palmer,et al.  Interaction between urbanization and climate variability amplifies watershed nitrate export in Maryland. , 2008, Environmental science & technology.

[8]  D. Osmond,et al.  Characterization of turf practices in five North Carolina communities. , 2004, Journal of environmental quality.

[9]  B. F. Pope,et al.  Low-Flow Characteristics and Discharge Profiles for Selected Streams in the Cape Fear River Basin, North Carolina, Through 1998 , 2001 .

[10]  D. F. Grigal.  Inputs and outputs of mercury from terrestrial watersheds: a review , 2002 .

[11]  M. Goodsite,et al.  Environmental costs of mercury pollution. , 2006, The Science of the total environment.

[12]  J. Tu.  Combined impact of climate and land use changes on streamflow and water quality in eastern Massachusetts, USA , 2009 .

[13]  M Craig Barber,et al.  Application of ecosystem‐scale fate and bioaccumulation models to predict fish mercury response times to changes in atmospheric deposition , 2009, Environmental toxicology and chemistry.

[14]  R. Ewing,et al.  MEASURING SPRAWL AND ITS IMPACT , 2002 .

[15]  O. Bullock,et al.  Atmospheric mercury simulation using the CMAQ model: formulation description and analysis of wet deposition results , 2002 .

[16]  William H. McDowell,et al.  Nitrogen Saturation in Temperate Forest Ecosystems , 1998 .

[17]  Khalid Alvi,et al.  Characterizing Spatial and Temporal Dynamics: Development of a Grid-Based Watershed Mercury Loading Model , 2005 .

[18]  K. Beven,et al.  A physically based, variable contributing area model of basin hydrology , 1979 .

[19]  R. Naiman,et al.  Biotic versus hydrologic control over seasonal nitrate leaching in a floodplain forest , 2003 .

[20]  J. Greenfield,et al.  WATERSHED MODELING EXTENSIONS OF THE WATERSHED CHARACTERIZATION SYSTEM , 2002 .

[21]  S. Rose.  Utilization of Decadal Tritium Variation for Assessing the Residence Time of Base Flow , 2007, Ground water.

[22]  P. Vidon.  Riparian zone management and environmental quality: a multi‐contaminant challenge , 2010 .

[23]  John L. Stoddard,et al.  The Relationship Between Stream Chemistry and Watershed Land Cover Data in the Mid-Atlantic Region, U.S. , 1998 .

[24]  Hwai-Ping Cheng,et al.  A Numerical Model Simulating Water Flow and Contaminant and Sediment Transport in WAterSHed Systems of 1-D Stream-River Network, 2-D Overland Regime, and 3-D Subsurface Media (WASH123D: Version 1.0) , 1998 .

[25]  S. Nelson,et al.  Mass Balances of Mercury and Nitrogen in Burned and Unburned Forested Watersheds at Acadia National Park, Maine, USA , 2007, Environmental monitoring and assessment.

[26]  D. Byun,et al.  Review of the Governing Equations, Computational Algorithms, and Other Components of the Models-3 Community Multiscale Air Quality (CMAQ) Modeling System , 2006 .

[27]  David L. Lorenz,et al.  County-level estimates of nutrient inputs to the landsurface of the conterminous United States, 1982-2001 , 2006 .

[28]  Robert P. Mason,et al.  Mercury and methylmercury transport through an urban watershed , 1998 .

[29]  E. Boyer,et al.  Responses of stream nitrate and DOC loadings to hydrological forcing and climate change in an upland forest of the northeastern United States , 2009 .

[30]  R. Howarth,et al.  Riverine nitrogen export from the continents to the coasts , 2006 .

[31]  J. Aber,et al.  Nitrogen saturation in northern forest ecosystems , 1989 .

[32]  Charles T Driscoll,et al.  Effects of acidic deposition on forest and aquatic ecosystems in New York State. , 2003, Environmental pollution.

[33]  Jeffrey J. McDonnell,et al.  The effects of land use on stream nitrate dynamics , 2007 .

[34]  E. J. Wilson,et al.  A semi-distributed ntegrated itrogen model for multiple source assessment in tchments (INCA): Part I — model structure and process equations , 1998 .

[35]  R. Dennis,et al.  The Watershed Deposition Tool: A Tool for Incorporating Atmospheric Deposition in Water‐Quality Analyses 1 , 2009 .

[36]  Robin L. Dennis,et al.  Atmospheric deposition of nitrogen: Implications for nutrient over-enrichment of coastal waters , 2002 .

[37]  Donna Mergler,et al.  Methylmercury Exposure and Health Effects in Humans: A Worldwide Concern , 2007, Ambio.

[38]  Véronique Beaujouan,et al.  A nitrogen model for European catchments: INCA, new model structure and equations , 2002 .

[39]  E. A. Henry,et al.  Evidence for regulation of monomethyl mercury by nitrate in a seasonally stratified, eutrophic lake. , 2009, Environmental science & technology.

[40]  John R. Williams.  Sediment-yield prediction with Universal Equation using runoff energy factor , 1975 .

[41]  K. Bencala,et al.  Hydrological controls on dissolved organic carbon during snowmelt in the Snake River near Montezuma, Colorado , 1994 .

[42]  Lawrence E. Band,et al.  Regulation of Nitrate‐N Release from Temperate Forests: A Test of the N Flushing Hypothesis , 1996 .

[43]  S. Nelson,et al.  Watershed Nitrogen and Mercury Geochemical Fluxes Integrate Landscape Factors in Long-term Research Watersheds at Acadia National Park, Maine, USA , 2007, Environmental monitoring and assessment.

[44]  M. Mallin,et al.  Nitrogen and phosphorus species in the coastal and shelf waters of Southeastern North Carolina, Mid-Atlantic U.S. coast , 2007 .

[45]  Michael G. Brown,et al.  Spatial Variability of Nitrate Concentrations Under Diverse Conditions in Tributaries to a Lake Watershed 1 , 2009 .

[46]  M. E. Brigham,et al.  Mercury in fish, bed sediment, and water from streams across the United States, 1998-2005 , 2009 .

[47]  S. Nelson,et al.  Input-Output Budgets of Inorganic Nitrogen for 24 Forest Watersheds in the Northeastern United States: A Review , 2004 .

[48]  F. Morel,et al.  THE CHEMICAL CYCLE AND BIOACCUMULATION OF MERCURY , 1998 .

[49]  R. Carignan,et al.  Beaver ponds increase methylmercury concentrations in Canadian shield streams along vegetation and pond-age gradients. , 2009, Environmental science & technology.

[50]  D. Krabbenhoft,et al.  A National Pilot Study of Mercury Contamination of Aquatic Ecosystems along Multiple Gradients , 1999 .

[51]  R. Kellogg,et al.  Manure Nutrients Relative to The Capacity Of Cropland And Pastureland To Assimilate Nutrients: Spatial and Temporal Trends for the United States , 2000 .

[52]  C. Driscoll,et al.  Wetland influence on mercury fate and transport in a temperate forested watershed. , 2008, Environmental pollution.

[53]  K. Roy,et al.  Chronic and episodic acidification of Adirondack streams from acid rain in 2003-2005. , 2008, Journal of environmental quality.

[54]  R. Hunt,et al.  Comparison of total mercury and methylmercury cycling at five sites using the small watershed approach. , 2008, Environmental pollution.

[55]  E. Davidson,et al.  Microbiological basis of NO and N2O production and consumption in soil. , 1989 .