A DTW distance-based seismic waveform clustering method for layers of varying thickness

Seismic waveform clustering is a useful technique for lithologic identification and reservoir characterization. The current seismic waveform clustering algorithms are predominantly based on a fixed time window, which is applicable for layers of stable thickness. When a layer exhibits variable thickness in the seismic response, a fixed time window cannot provide comprehensive geologic information for the target interval. Therefore, we propose a novel approach for a waveform clustering workflow based on a variable time window to enable broader applications. The dynamic time warping (DTW) distance is first introduced to effectively measure the similarities between seismic waveforms with various lengths. We develop a DTW distance-based clustering algorithm to extract centroids, and we then determine the class of all seismic traces according to the DTW distances from centroids. To greatly reduce the computational complexity in seismic data application, we propose a superpixel-based seismic data thinning approach. We further propose an integrated workflow that can be applied to practical seismic data by incorporating the DTW distance-based clustering and seismic data thinning algorithms. We evaluated the performance by applying the proposed workflow to synthetic seismograms and seismic survey data. Compared with the the traditional waveform clustering method, the synthetic seismogram results demonstrate the enhanced capability of the proposed workflow to detect boundaries of different lithologies or lithologic associations with variable thickness. Results from a practical application show that the planar map of seismic waveform clustering obtained by the proposed workflow correlates well with the geological characteristics of wells in terms of reservoir thickness.

[1]  M. Matos,et al.  Unsupervised seismic facies analysis using wavelet transform and self-organizing maps , 2007 .

[2]  Teuvo Kohonen,et al.  Self-organized formation of topologically correct feature maps , 2004, Biological Cybernetics.

[3]  Jitendra Malik,et al.  Learning a classification model for segmentation , 2003, Proceedings Ninth IEEE International Conference on Computer Vision.

[4]  B. P. West,et al.  Interactive seismic facies classification using textural attributes and neural networks , 2002 .

[5]  T. Kohonen Self-organized formation of topographically correct feature maps , 1982 .

[6]  Wang Lei,et al.  Spoken term detection based on DTW , 2017 .

[7]  M. Mutti,et al.  Characterization of a deeply buried paleokarst terrain in the Loppa High using core data and multiattribute seismic facies classification , 2012 .

[8]  Frank Scherbaum,et al.  Unsupervised pattern recognition in continuous seismic wavefield records using Self-Organizing Maps , 2010 .

[9]  Kurt J. Marfurt,et al.  Seismic facies analysis using generative topographic mapping , 2014 .

[10]  Minping Qian,et al.  A DTW-based probability model for speaker feature analysis and data mining , 2002, Pattern Recognit. Lett..

[11]  Chanwoo Kim,et al.  Robust DTW-based recognition algorithm for hand-held consumer devices , 2005, IEEE Transactions on Consumer Electronics.

[12]  Mrinal K. Sen,et al.  Artificial immune based self organizing maps for seismic facies analysis , 2012 .

[13]  Kurt J. Marfurt,et al.  Characterizing a Mississippian tripolitic chert reservoir using 3D unsupervised and supervised multiattribute seismic facies analysis: An example from Osage County, Oklahoma , 2013 .

[14]  Thierry Coléou,et al.  Interpreter's Corner—Unsupervised seismic facies classification: A review and comparison of techniques and implementation , 2003 .

[15]  Jing Zhang,et al.  Characterizing a turbidite system in Canterbury Basin, New Zealand, using seismic attributes and distance-preserving self-organizing maps , 2016 .

[16]  M. Nafi Toksöz,et al.  Seismic facies classification and identification by competitive neural networks , 2003 .

[17]  James R. Glass,et al.  Unsupervised spoken keyword spotting via segmental DTW on Gaussian posteriorgrams , 2009, 2009 IEEE Workshop on Automatic Speech Recognition & Understanding.

[18]  Jian Pei,et al.  2012- Data Mining. Concepts and Techniques, 3rd Edition.pdf , 2012 .

[19]  Kwang-Deok Seo,et al.  Robust DTW-based recognition algorithm for hand-held consumer devices [speech recognition] , 2005 .

[20]  F. Itakura,et al.  Minimum prediction residual principle applied to speech recognition , 1975 .

[21]  Chanwoo Kim,et al.  Robust DTW-based recognition algorithm for hand-held consumer devices [speech recognition] , 2005, 2005 Digest of Technical Papers. International Conference on Consumer Electronics, 2005. ICCE..

[22]  Mansour Sheikhan,et al.  Using DTW neural–based MFCC warping to improve emotional speech recognition , 2011, Neural Computing and Applications.

[23]  Fangyu Li,et al.  Constraining self-organizing map facies analysis with stratigraphy: An approach to increase the credibility in automatic seismic facies classification , 2017 .

[24]  Wen-kai Lu,et al.  Supervised seismic facies analysis based on image segmentation , 2018 .