Basic Response Time Tools for Studying General Processing Capacity in Attention, Perception, and Cognition

Abstract One of the more important constructs in the study of attention, perception, and cognition is that of capacity. The authors reviewed some of the common meanings of this construct and proposed a more precise treatment. They showed how the distribution of response times can be used to derive measures of process capacity and to further illustrate how these measures can be used to address important hypotheses in cognition.

[1]  John R. Anderson Language, Memory, and Thought , 1976 .

[2]  Sheldon M. Ross,et al.  Introduction to probability models , 1975 .

[3]  P Jolicoeur,et al.  Impact of Quality of the Image, Orientation, and Similarity of the Stimuli on Visual Search for Faces , 1994, Perception.

[4]  J Miller,et al.  Channel interaction and the redundant-targets effect in bimodal divided attention. , 1991, Journal of experimental psychology. Human perception and performance.

[5]  Walter Schneider,et al.  Controlled and Automatic Human Information Processing: 1. Detection, Search, and Attention. , 1977 .

[6]  Evidence of limited capacity and noise reduction with single-element displays in the location-cuing paradigm. , 1997 .

[7]  J. Townsend SOME RESULTS CONCERNING THE IDENTIFIABILITY OF PARALLEL AND SERIAL PROCESSES , 1972 .

[8]  George Sperling,et al.  The information available in brief visual presentations. , 1960 .

[9]  M. Cheal,et al.  Evidence of limited capacity and noise reduction with single-element displays in the location-cuing paradigm. , 1997, Journal of experimental psychology. Human perception and performance.

[10]  D. Raab Statistical facilitation of simple reaction times. , 1962, Transactions of the New York Academy of Sciences.

[11]  G D Logan,et al.  Decomposing visual search: evidence of multiple item-specific skills. , 1998, Journal of experimental psychology. Human perception and performance.

[12]  N. Moray Attention in Dichotic Listening: Affective Cues and the Influence of Instructions , 1959 .

[13]  James T. Townsend,et al.  Issues and Models Concerning the Processing of a Finite Number of Inputs 1 , 2021, Human Information Processing.

[14]  James T. Townsend,et al.  Faces as Gestalt stimuli: Process characteristics. , 2001 .

[15]  James T. Townsend Some characteristics of visual whole report behavior , 1981 .

[16]  John Theios,et al.  Reaction Time Measurements in the Study of Memory Processes: Theory and Data1 , 1973 .

[17]  G. Logan On the ability to inhibit thought and action , 1984 .

[18]  Sheldon M. Ross,et al.  Introduction to Probability Models (4th ed.). , 1990 .

[19]  Richard Schweickert,et al.  Models of central capacity and concurrency , 1984 .

[20]  L. Nyberg,et al.  Effects of division of attention during encoding and retrieval on age differences in episodic memory. , 1997, Experimental aging research.

[21]  P. Smith,et al.  Obtaining meaningful results from Fourier deconvolution of reaction time data. , 1990, Psychological bulletin.

[22]  D. Navon Resources—a theoretical soup stone? , 1984 .

[23]  J. Townsend,et al.  Spatio-temporal properties of elementary perception: an investigation of parallel, serial, and coactive theories , 1995 .

[24]  M. Wenger On the whats and hows of retrieval in the acquisition of a simple skill. , 1999 .

[25]  J. Tanaka,et al.  Features and their configuration in face recognition , 1997, Memory & cognition.

[26]  Jeff Miller Channel interaction and the redundant-targets effect in bimodal divided attention. , 1991 .

[27]  M. Farah,et al.  Parts and Wholes in Face Recognition , 1993, The Quarterly journal of experimental psychology. A, Human experimental psychology.

[28]  G. Logan Shapes of reaction-time distributions and shapes of learning curves: a test of the instance theory of automaticity. , 1992, Journal of experimental psychology. Learning, memory, and cognition.

[29]  L. Sucheston Modern Probability Theory and its Applications. , 1961 .

[30]  R. Marsh,et al.  Event-based prospective memory and executive control of working memory. , 1998, Journal of experimental psychology. Learning, memory, and cognition.

[31]  S J Luck,et al.  Mechanisms of visual-spatial attention: resource allocation or uncertainty reduction? , 1996, Journal of experimental psychology. Human perception and performance.

[32]  John M. Henderson,et al.  Spatial precues affect target discrimination in the absence of visual noise. , 1996 .

[33]  Richard C. Atkinson,et al.  Human Memory: A Proposed System and its Control Processes , 1968, Psychology of Learning and Motivation.

[34]  A. Bonnel,et al.  Divided attention between simultaneous auditory and visual signals , 1998, Perception & psychophysics.

[35]  R. Yin Looking at Upside-down Faces , 1969 .

[36]  A. Treisman Contextual Cues in Selective Listening , 1960 .

[37]  Daniel Gopher,et al.  On the Economy of the Human Processing System: A Model of Multiple Capacity. , 1977 .

[38]  P. Cavanagh,et al.  FACIAL ORGANIZATION BLOCKS ACCESS TO LOW-LEVEL FEATURES: AN OBJECT INFERIORITY EFFECT , 1995 .

[39]  Walter Schneider,et al.  Controlled and automatic human information processing: II. Perceptual learning, automatic attending and a general theory. , 1977 .

[40]  J. Deutsch Perception and Communication , 1958, Nature.

[41]  D. Kahneman,et al.  Attention and Effort , 1973 .

[42]  D. Vorberg,et al.  Distribution inequalities for parallel models with unlimited capacity , 1994 .

[43]  C Bundesen,et al.  Visual selection from multielement displays: measuring and modeling effects of exposure duration. , 1988, Journal of experimental psychology. Human perception and performance.

[44]  W. Weibull A Statistical Distribution Function of Wide Applicability , 1951 .

[45]  M. Wenger On the whats and hows of retrieval in the acquisition of a simple skill. , 1999, Journal of experimental psychology. Learning, memory, and cognition.

[46]  G. Sperling A Model for Visual Memory Tasks1 , 1963, Human factors.

[47]  N. Lavie Perceptual load as a necessary condition for selective attention. , 1995, Journal of experimental psychology. Human perception and performance.

[48]  D. D. Wheeler Processes in word recognition , 1970 .

[49]  A. Noest,et al.  Nonspatial Visual Attention Explained by Spatial Attention Plus Limited Storage , 1996, Perception.

[50]  M. Farah,et al.  What causes the face inversion effect? , 1995, Journal of experimental psychology. Human perception and performance.

[51]  D. Raab DIVISION OF PSYCHOLOGY: STATISTICAL FACILITATION OF SIMPLE REACTION TIMES* , 1962 .

[52]  M. Farah,et al.  What is "special" about face perception? , 1998, Psychological review.

[53]  J. Townsend,et al.  Varieties of Binocular Interaction in Human Vision , 1998 .

[54]  James T. Townsend,et al.  Activation-state representation of models for the redundant-signals-effect. , 1997 .

[55]  A. Diederich Intersensory facilitation of reaction time: evaluation of counter and diffusion coactivation models , 1995 .

[56]  G. M. Reicher Perceptual recognition as a function of meaninfulness of stimulus material. , 1969, Journal of experimental psychology.

[57]  Hans Colonius,et al.  A Note on the Stop-Signal Paradigm, or How to Observe the Unobservable , 1990 .

[58]  Jeff Miller,et al.  Divided attention: Evidence for coactivation with redundant signals , 1982, Cognitive Psychology.

[59]  J. Henderson Spatial precues affect target discrimination in the absence of visual noise. , 1996, Journal of experimental psychology. Human perception and performance.

[60]  D. Robin,et al.  Endogenous visuospatial precuing effects as a function of age and task demands , 1996, Perception & psychophysics.

[61]  Barry H. Kantowitz,et al.  On experimenter-limited processes. , 1976 .

[62]  J T Townsend,et al.  Truth and consequences of ordinal differences in statistical distributions: toward a theory of hierarchical inference. , 1990, Psychological bulletin.

[63]  D. Norman Toward a theory of memory and attention. , 1968 .

[64]  John R. Anderson,et al.  A test of parallel versus serial processing applied to memory retrieval , 1981 .

[65]  G. Logan Toward an instance theory of automatization. , 1988 .

[66]  James T. Townsend,et al.  The Stochastic Modeling of Elementary Psychological Processes , 1983 .