Robustness of Nonlinear Control Systems to Network-Induced Imperfections

Nowadays control systems are increasingly implemented over shared resource-constrained communication networks. Namely, sensors, controllers and actuators no longer exchange information through dedicated point-to-point connections but compete for network access, which gives rise to network-induced imperfections that adversely affect control performance. Prevalent network phenomena are scheduling protocols, nonuniform variable delays, quantization, packet dropouts, sampled and distorted data. Besides possessing usual robustness requirements (e.g., to modeling uncertainties or external disturbances), such control systems ought to be robust against the aforementioned network phenomena as well. This article brings a methodology to quantify control system robustness via Lp-gains as the control laws, communication delays, sampling intervals, noise levels or scheduling protocols change. Building upon impulsive delayed system modeling, Lyapunov stability and the small-gain theorem, the proposed methodology takes into account nonlinear time-varying dynamic controllers and plants as well as model-based estimation, output feedback and large delays. The inverted pendulum example is provided.

[1]  L. Berezansky,et al.  Exponential Stability of Linear Delay Impulsive Differential Equations , 1993 .

[2]  Stephen P. Boyd,et al.  Linear Matrix Inequalities in Systems and Control Theory , 1994 .

[3]  Zhong-Ping Jiang,et al.  Small-gain theorem for ISS systems and applications , 1994, Math. Control. Signals Syst..

[4]  Linda Bushnell,et al.  Stability analysis of networked control systems , 1999, Proceedings of the 1999 American Control Conference (Cat. No. 99CH36251).

[5]  George Henri Ballinger Qualitative theory of impulsive delay differential equations , 2000 .

[6]  Dragan Nesic,et al.  Input-output stability properties of networked control systems , 2004, IEEE Transactions on Automatic Control.

[7]  Nuno C. Martins Finite gain lp stabilization requires analog control , 2006, Syst. Control. Lett..

[8]  João Pedro Hespanha,et al.  A Survey of Recent Results in Networked Control Systems , 2007, Proceedings of the IEEE.

[9]  Paulo Tabuada,et al.  Event-Triggered Real-Time Scheduling of Stabilizing Control Tasks , 2007, IEEE Transactions on Automatic Control.

[10]  Carlos E. de Souza,et al.  Delay-dependent robust stability and 2-gain analysis of a class of nonlinear time-delay systems , 2008, Autom..

[11]  Sandra Hirche,et al.  A distributed controller approach for delay-independent stability of networked control systems , 2009, Autom..

[12]  Michael D. Lemmon,et al.  Event-Triggered Feedback in Control, Estimation, and Optimization , 2010 .

[13]  Paulo Tabuada,et al.  To Sample or not to Sample: Self-Triggered Control for Nonlinear Systems , 2008, IEEE Transactions on Automatic Control.

[14]  Panos J. Antsaklis,et al.  Model-based control with intermittent feedback: bridging the gap between continuous and instantaneous feedback , 2010, Int. J. Control.

[15]  Nathan van de Wouw,et al.  Networked Control Systems With Communication Constraints: Tradeoffs Between Transmission Intervals, Delays and Performance , 2010, IEEE Transactions on Automatic Control.

[16]  Stefan Siegmund,et al.  An Improved Maximum Allowable Transfer Interval for $L^{p}$-Stability of Networked Control Systems , 2010, IEEE Transactions on Automatic Control.

[17]  Yuanqing Xia,et al.  Analysis and Synthesis of Networked Control Systems , 2011 .

[18]  Pavankumar Tallapragada,et al.  On event triggered trajectory tracking for control affine nonlinear systems , 2011, IEEE Conference on Decision and Control and European Control Conference.

[19]  Stefano Longo Optimal and robust scheduling for networked control systems , 2011 .

[20]  Armand Toguyéni,et al.  A Switched System Approach to Exponential Stabilization Through Communication Network , 2012, IEEE Transactions on Control Systems Technology.

[21]  Michael Malisoff,et al.  Robustness of nonlinear systems with respect to delay and sampling of the controls , 2013, Autom..

[22]  Panos J. Antsaklis,et al.  Event-triggered output feedback control for networked control systems using passivity: Achieving L2 stability in the presence of communication delays and signal quantization , 2013, Autom..

[23]  Dominique Sauter,et al.  Co-design of safe networked control systems , 2013, Annu. Rev. Control..

[24]  Bo Zhang,et al.  A novel control design for delayed teleoperation based on delay-scheduled Lyapunov–Krasovskii functionals , 2014, Int. J. Control.

[25]  Fabian R. Wirth,et al.  Realization of Try-Once-Discard in Wireless Multihop Networks , 2014, IEEE Transactions on Industrial Informatics.

[26]  W. P. M. H. Heemels,et al.  Stability analysis of large-scale networked control systems with local networks: a hybrid small-gain approach , 2014, HSCC.

[27]  Emilia Fridman,et al.  Introduction to Time-Delay Systems: Analysis and Control , 2014 .

[28]  Vedran Bilas,et al.  Resource Management in Cooperative Multi-Agent Networks Through Self-Triggering , 2015 .

[29]  Ricardo G. Sanfelice,et al.  Input-output triggered control using Lp -stability over finite horizons , 2015 .

[30]  Ramazan Coban,et al.  Artificial Bee Colony Algorithm Based Linear Quadratic Optimal Controller Design for a Nonlinear Inverted Pendulum , 2015 .

[31]  I. Palunko,et al.  Intermittent information in Networked Control Systems , 2016, 2016 International Conference on Smart Systems and Technologies (SST).

[32]  Sandra Hirche,et al.  Stabilizing Transmission Intervals for Nonlinear Delayed Networked Control Systems , 2017, IEEE Transactions on Automatic Control.

[33]  S. Hirche,et al.  Error-DependentDataScheduling inResource-Aware Multi-LoopNetworkedControl Systems ⋆ , 2017 .