STRUCTURALLY BIASED PHONOLOGY: COMPLEXITY IN LEARNING AND TYPOLOGY

This paper presents structurally biased phonology, a program of research that aims to formalize and better understand the role of structural complexity in phonological learning and typology. The paper situates the program with respect to other research in generative phonology, and provides a framework for it, termed Incremental MaxEnt with a Conjunctive Constraint Schema (IME/CCS). This framework extends previous proposals in generative phonology, cognitive psychology and machine learning to the study of structural complexity. IME/CCS is successfully applied to model some illustrative cases in which structurally simpler patterns have been found easier for humans to learn. It is also shown to make predictions about skews toward simplicity in typology, in conjunction with a model of iterated learning.

[1]  Rachid Ridouane,et al.  Where do phonological features come from , 2011 .

[2]  George N. Clements,et al.  Feature economy in sound systems , 2003, Phonology.

[3]  Noam Chomsky,et al.  The Sound Pattern of English , 1968 .

[4]  Jeff Mielke,et al.  Feature economy in natural, random, and synthetic inventories , 2011 .

[5]  P. Smolensky,et al.  Optimality Theory: Constraint Interaction in Generative Grammar , 2004 .

[6]  Judith G. Hochberg Learning Spanish Stress: Developmental and Theoretical Perspectives , 1988 .

[7]  Elliott Moreton,et al.  Structure and Substance in Artificial-phonology Learning, Part I: Structure , 2012, Lang. Linguistics Compass.

[8]  E. Moreton Analytic bias and phonological typology* , 2008, Phonology.

[9]  Gunnar Ólafur Hansson,et al.  On the evolution of consonant harmony: the case of secondary articulation agreement* , 2007, Phonology.

[10]  Rachid Ridouane,et al.  Where do phonological features come from? : cognitive, physical and developmental bases of distinctive speech categories , 2011 .

[11]  Janet Wiles,et al.  Language Change across Generations for Robots using Cognitive Maps , 2010, ALIFE.

[12]  B. D. Boer Evolutionary phonology: the emergence of sound patterns , 2006 .

[13]  Andrew Wedel,et al.  Category competition drives contrast maintenance within an exemplar-based production/perception loop , 2004, SIGMORPHON@ACL.

[14]  R Core Team,et al.  R: A language and environment for statistical computing. , 2014 .

[15]  S. Anderson Phonology in the twentieth century : theories of rules and theories of representations , 1985 .

[16]  J. D. Smith,et al.  Category learning in rhesus monkeys: a study of the Shepard, Hovland, and Jenkins (1961) tasks. , 2004, Journal of experimental psychology. General.

[17]  Jeff Mielke,et al.  The Emergence of Distinctive Features , 2008 .

[18]  Angelo Cangelosi,et al.  Simulating the Evolution of Language , 2002, Springer London.

[19]  Bruce Hayes,et al.  A Maximum Entropy Model of Phonotactics and Phonotactic Learning , 2008, Linguistic Inquiry.

[20]  Paul Boersma,et al.  The evolution of auditory dispersion in bidirectional constraint grammars* , 2008, Phonology.

[21]  Paul Kiparsky,et al.  The Amphichronic Program vs. Evolutionary Phonology , 2006 .

[22]  Jacob Feldman,et al.  Minimization of Boolean complexity in human concept learning , 2000, Nature.

[23]  A. Wedel Self‐Organization in Phonology , 2011 .

[24]  Erik D. Thiessen,et al.  Pattern induction by infant language learners. , 2003, Developmental psychology.

[25]  P. Boersma,et al.  Convergence Properties of a Gradual Learning Algorithm for Harmonic Grammar , 2013 .

[26]  Elliott Moreton,et al.  Inter- and intra-dimensional dependencies in implicit phonotactic learning , 2012 .

[27]  Kie Zuraw Probability in Language Change , 2002 .

[28]  Karen Jesney,et al.  Biases in Harmonic Grammar: the road to restrictive learning , 2011 .

[29]  F ROSENBLATT,et al.  The perceptron: a probabilistic model for information storage and organization in the brain. , 1958, Psychological review.

[30]  D. Silverman A Critical Introduction to Phonology: of Sound, Mind, and Body , 2006 .

[31]  Mary E. Beckman,et al.  Conceptual Foundations of Phonology as a Laboratory Science (reprint) , 2011 .

[32]  Alan C. L. Yu,et al.  On measuring phonetic precursor robustness: a response to Moreton* , 2011, Phonology.

[33]  Keren Rice,et al.  The Blackwell Companion to Phonology , 2011 .

[34]  P. Smolensky,et al.  Learning biases predict a word order universal , 2012, Cognition.

[35]  S. Kirby,et al.  The emergence of linguistic structure: an overview of the iterated learning model , 2002 .

[36]  Joe Pater Non-uniformity in English secondary stress: the role of ranked and lexically specific constraints , 2000, Phonology.

[37]  James L. McClelland,et al.  On learning the past-tenses of English verbs: implicit rules or parallel distributed processing , 1986 .

[38]  Joe Pater,et al.  Weighted Constraints in Generative Linguistics , 2009, Cogn. Sci..

[39]  G. Marcus,et al.  On the Role of Variables in Phonology: Remarks on Hayes and Wilson 2008 , 2012, Linguistic Inquiry.

[40]  Guy W. Mineau,et al.  Complexity minimization in rule-based category learning: Revising the catalog of Boolean concepts and evidence for non-minimal rules , 2007 .

[41]  R. Nosofsky,et al.  Comparing modes of rule-based classification learning: A replication and extension of Shepard, Hovland, and Jenkins (1961) , 1994, Memory & cognition.

[42]  Andrew Martin Grammars leak: Modeling how phonotactic generalizations interact within the grammar , 2011 .

[43]  George N. Clements,et al.  The geometry of phonological features , 1985, Phonology Yearbook.

[44]  J. Elman,et al.  Learning and morphological change , 1995, Cognition.

[45]  Andries W. Coetzee,et al.  The Place of Variation in Phonological Theory , 2011 .

[46]  J. McCarthy Feature Geometry and Dependency: A Review , 1988 .

[47]  Stephan Lewandowsky,et al.  Theoretical and empirical evidence for the impact of inductive biases on cultural evolution , 2008, Philosophical Transactions of the Royal Society B: Biological Sciences.

[48]  Joe Pater,et al.  Morpheme-Specific Phonology: Constraint Indexation and Inconsistency Resolution , 2009 .

[49]  Stephen G. Parker,et al.  Phonological argumentation : essays on evidence and motivation , 2009 .

[50]  Robert Kirchner,et al.  Phonetically Based Phonology , 2008 .

[51]  D. Stampe A dissertation on natural phonology , 1979 .

[52]  G. Bower,et al.  From conditioning to category learning: an adaptive network model. , 1988 .

[53]  J. Kruschke,et al.  ALCOVE: an exemplar-based connectionist model of category learning. , 1992, Psychological review.

[54]  Bridget Samuels,et al.  Phonological architecture : a biolinguistic perspective , 2011 .

[55]  John Kingston,et al.  Between the grammar and physics of speech , 1994 .

[56]  Thomas L. Griffiths,et al.  A Rational Analysis of Rule-Based Concept Learning , 2008, Cogn. Sci..

[57]  Mark Johnson,et al.  Learning OT constraint rankings using a maximum entropy model , 2003 .

[58]  Elliott Moreton,et al.  Is phonological learning special , 2012 .

[59]  Charles Reiss,et al.  The Phonological Enterprise , 2008 .

[60]  Gerhard Jäger,et al.  Maximum Entropy Models and Stochastic Optimality Theory , 2003 .

[61]  D. Currie Labial Place in Phonology: Universal and Variable , 2013 .

[62]  J. Goldsmith,et al.  The handbook of phonological theory , 2011 .

[63]  Colin Wilson,et al.  Learning Phonology With Substantive Bias: An Experimental and Computational Study of Velar Palatalization , 2006, Cogn. Sci..

[64]  B. Hayes,et al.  Natural and Unnatural Constraints in Hungarian Vowel Harmony , 2009 .

[65]  李幼升,et al.  Ph , 1989 .

[66]  Jason Riggle,et al.  Three Correlates of the Typological Frequency of Quantity-Insensitive Stress Systems , 2008, SIGMORPHON.

[67]  George N. Clements,et al.  The Role of Features in Phonological Inventories , 2005 .

[68]  Elizabeth Sagey The representation of features in non-linear phonology : the articulator node hierarchy , 1992 .

[69]  Paul Boersma Functional Optimality Theory , 1997 .

[70]  A. Yu Origins of Sound Change: Approaches to Phonologization , 2013 .

[71]  G. Bower,et al.  Evaluating an adaptive network model of human learning , 1988 .

[72]  David L. Faigman,et al.  Human category learning. , 2005, Annual review of psychology.

[73]  M. Hale,et al.  Substance Abuse and Dysfunctionalism: Current Trends in Phonology , 2000, Linguistic Inquiry.

[74]  J. Feldman An algebra of human concept learning , 2006 .

[75]  J. Ohala Papers in Laboratory Phonology: The phonetics and phonology of aspects of assimilation , 1990 .

[76]  Lenka Pitonakova,et al.  Artificial Life XV: Proceedings of The Fifteenth International Conference on the Synthesis and Simulation of Living Systems , 2014 .

[77]  Joe Pater Gradual Learning and Convergence , 2008, Linguistic Inquiry.

[78]  G. Docherty,et al.  Phonological knowledge : conceptual and empirical issues , 2000 .

[79]  R. Shepard,et al.  Learning and memorization of classifications. , 1961 .

[80]  Paul Boersma,et al.  A programme for bidirectional phonology and phonetics and their acquisition and evolution , 2011 .

[81]  E. Moreton,et al.  Structure and substance in artificial-phonology learning , 2012 .

[82]  D. Medin,et al.  SUSTAIN: a network model of category learning. , 2004, Psychological review.

[83]  Betty S. Phillips,et al.  Word Frequency and the Actuation of Sound Change , 1984 .

[84]  Gaja Jarosz,et al.  Implicational markedness and frequency in constraint-based computational models of phonological learning. , 2010, Journal of child language.