Mapping between the OBO and OWL ontology languages

BackgroundOntologies are commonly used in biomedicine to organize concepts to describe domains such as anatomies, environments, experiment, taxonomies etc. NCBO BioPortal currently hosts about 180 different biomedical ontologies. These ontologies have been mainly expressed in either the Open Biomedical Ontology (OBO) format or the Web Ontology Language (OWL). OBO emerged from the Gene Ontology, and supports most of the biomedical ontology content. In comparison, OWL is a Semantic Web language, and is supported by the World Wide Web consortium together with integral query languages, rule languages and distributed infrastructure for information interchange. These features are highly desirable for the OBO content as well. A convenient method for leveraging these features for OBO ontologies is by transforming OBO ontologies to OWL.ResultsWe have developed a methodology for translating OBO ontologies to OWL using the organization of the Semantic Web itself to guide the work. The approach reveals that the constructs of OBO can be grouped together to form a similar layer cake. Thus we were able to decompose the problem into two parts. Most OBO constructs have easy and obvious equivalence to a construct in OWL. A small subset of OBO constructs requires deeper consideration. We have defined transformations for all constructs in an effort to foster a standard common mapping between OBO and OWL. Our mapping produces OWL-DL, a Description Logics based subset of OWL with desirable computational properties for efficiency and correctness. Our Java implementation of the mapping is part of the official Gene Ontology project source.ConclusionsOur transformation system provides a lossless roundtrip mapping for OBO ontologies, i.e. an OBO ontology may be translated to OWL and back without loss of knowledge. In addition, it provides a roadmap for bridging the gap between the two ontology languages in order to enable the use of ontology content in a language independent manner.

[1]  Huajun Chen,et al.  The Semantic Web , 2011, Lecture Notes in Computer Science.

[2]  Boris Motik,et al.  OBO and OWL: Leveraging Semantic Web Technologies for the Life Sciences , 2007, ISWC/ASWC.

[3]  Thomas R. Gruber,et al.  A translation approach to portable ontology specifications , 1993, Knowl. Acquis..

[4]  James A. Hendler,et al.  The Semantic Web" in Scientific American , 2001 .

[5]  Peter F. Patel-Schneider,et al.  OWL 2 Web Ontology Language New Features and Rationale , 2009 .

[6]  G Stix,et al.  The mice that warred. , 2001, Scientific American.

[7]  Wenfei Fan,et al.  Keys with Upward Wildcards for XML , 2001, DEXA.

[8]  Peter Clark,et al.  Building Concept Representations from Reusable Components , 1997, AAAI/IAAI.

[9]  Frank van Harmelen,et al.  Web Ontology Language , 2004 .

[10]  Elio Rossi,et al.  Policy , 2007, Evidence-based Complementary and Alternative Medicine : eCAM.

[11]  Peter Clark,et al.  A library of generic concepts for composing knowledge bases , 2001, K-CAP '01.

[12]  Ian Horrocks,et al.  OIL: An Ontology Infrastructure for the Semantic Web , 2001, IEEE Intell. Syst..

[13]  Syed Hamid Tirmizi,et al.  OBO 2 OWL : Roundtrip between OBO and OWL , 2006 .

[14]  Ian Horrocks,et al.  The OBO to OWL Mapping, GO to OWL 1.1! , 2007, OWLED.

[15]  L. Stein,et al.  OWL Web Ontology Language - Reference , 2004 .

[16]  Gary D. Bader,et al.  BioPAX – biological pathway data exchange format , 2006 .

[17]  Sean Bechhofer,et al.  OWL: Web Ontology Language , 2009, Encyclopedia of Database Systems.

[18]  Daniel P. Miranker,et al.  Translating SQL Applications to the Semantic Web , 2008, DEXA.

[19]  Mark A. Musen,et al.  The NCBO OBOF to OWL Mapping , 2009 .

[20]  A. Rector,et al.  Relations in biomedical ontologies , 2005, Genome Biology.