The globalization of Swedish MNEs: Empirical evidence and theoretical explanations

We define globalization as the geographical dispersion of multinational enterprises (MNEs)’ value chain, in combination with increased inter-regional coordination, and use detailed firm-level data to show that 12 of Sweden’s 17 largest manufacturing companies indeed are global. By developing a Globalization Process Model we theoretically argue, in contrast to much of the existing literature, that globalization may evolve to a more general phenomenon. The globalization process is tortuous as MNEs have to develop dynamic capabilities which make them gradually more competitive and able to cope with varying institutional contexts. Empirical testing on globalization of MNEs originating from other home countries is suggested.

[1]  J. Dunning,et al.  An evolutionary approach to understanding international business activity: The co-evolution of MNEs and the institutional environment , 2009 .

[2]  Kent Eriksson,et al.  Experiential Knowledge and Costs in the Internationalization Process , 1997 .

[3]  Ulf R. Andersson,et al.  Opportunities, relational embeddedness and network structure , 2005 .

[4]  Nofal Nagles García.  Reseña de "Dynamic capabilities. Understanding strategic change in organizations" de Constance E. Helfat, Sydney Finkelstein, Will Mitchell, Margareth Peteraf, Harbir Singh, David J. Teece, Sidney Winter , 2010 .

[5]  J. Dunning.  Location and the multinational enterprise: A neglected factor? , 1998 .

[6]  C. Bartlett,et al.  The Multinational Corporation as an Interorganizational Network , 1990 .

[7]  P. Dicken,et al.  Global Shift: Mapping the Changing Contours of the World Economy (6th ed.). By Peter Dicken , 2007 .

[8]  D. Teece,et al.  Cross-border Market Co-creation, Dynamic Capabilities and the Entrepreneurial Theory of the Multinational Enterprise , 2010 .

[9]  D. Westney.  The Regional Multinationals: MNEs and ‘Global’ Strategic Management , 2006 .

[10]  P. Ghemawat.  Semiglobalization and international business strategy , 2003 .

[11]  Alain Verbeke,et al.  Liabilities of regional foreignness and the use of firm-level versus country-level data: a response to Dunning et al. (2007) , 2007 .

[12]  S. Tamer Cavusgil,et al.  The GMS: A Broad Conceptualization of Global Marketing Strategy and Its Effect on Firm Performance , 2002 .

[13]  L. Welch,et al.  Internationalization: Evolution of a Concept , 1988 .

[14]  David P. McCaffrey,et al.  Multinational Enterprises and the Global Economy. , 1995 .

[15]  D. Teece.  Explicating dynamic capabilities: the nature and microfoundations of (sustainable) enterprise performance , 2007 .

[16]  Michael E. Porter,et al.  How Global Companies Win Out , 1982 .

[17]  Giovanni Dosi,et al.  Perspective - On the Evolutionary and Behavioral Theories of Organizations: A Tentative Roadmap , 2007, Organ. Sci..

[18]  S. Winter,et al.  An evolutionary theory of economic change , 1983 .

[19]  William Q. Judge,et al.  The Theory of the Growth of the Firm, by Edith T. Penrose. Oxford: Blackwell, 1959 (Book Review) , 2008 .

[20]  S. Ghoshal,et al.  Social Capital, Intellectual Capital, and the Organizational Advantage , 1998 .

[21]  R. Emerson.  Power-Dependence Relations , 1962, Power in Modern Societies.

[22]  E. Penrose.  The theory of the growth of the firm twenty-five years after , 1960 .

[23]  John E. Prescott,et al.  The global integration of business functions: a study of multinational businesses in integrated global industries , 2003 .

[24]  Janell D. Townsend,et al.  The framework of a global company: A conceptualization and preliminary validation , 2004 .

[25]  J. Johanson,et al.  The tortuous road to globalization for Volvo's heavy truck business: Extending the scope of the Uppsala model , 2011 .

[26]  J. Jarillo,et al.  The Evolution of Research on Coordination Mechanisms in Multinational Corporations , 1989 .

[27]  J. Johanson,et al.  The Uppsala internationalization process model revisited: From liability of foreignness to liability of outsidership , 2009 .

[28]  D. Teece,et al.  DYNAMIC CAPABILITIES AND STRATEGIC MANAGEMENT , 1997 .

[29]  J. Dunning,et al.  Some macro-data on the regionalisation/globalisation debate: a comment on the Rugman/Verbeke analysis , 2007 .

[30]  J. Barney.  Firm Resources and Sustained Competitive Advantage , 1991 .

[31]  J. Cantwell.  Location and the multinational enterprise , 2009 .

[32]  J. Johanson,et al.  The Internationalization Process of the Firm—A Model of Knowledge Development and Increasing Foreign Market Commitments , 1977 .

[33]  J. Birkinshaw.  Entrepreneurship in multinational corporations : The characteristics of subsidiary initiatives , 1997 .

[34]  Christopher S. Boerner,et al.  Dynamic capabilities, competence and the behavioral theory of the firm , 2008 .

[35]  D. Teece,et al.  Introduction: On the nature and scope of dynamic capabilities , 2010 .

[36]  George S. Yip,et al.  Exploiting globalization potential: U.S. and japanese strategies , 1994 .

[37]  G. Hult,et al.  What Drives Performance in Globally Focused Marketing Organizations? A Three-Country Study , 2007 .

[38]  J. Johanson,et al.  The Uppsala model on evolution of the multinational business enterprise – from internalization to coordination of networks , 2013 .

[39]  Stephen J. Kobrin,et al.  AN EMPIRICAL ANALYSIS OF THE DETERMINANTS OF GLOBAL INTEGRATION , 1991 .

[40]  Ruth V. Aguilera,et al.  Globalization and location choice: an analysis of US multinational firms in 1980 and 2000 , 2007 .

[41]  E. Johnsen.  Richard M. Cyert & James G. March, A Behavioral Theory of The Firm, Prentice-Hall, Inc., Englewood Cliffs, New Jersey, 1963, 332 s. , 1964 .

[42]  The German Humpback: Internationalization and Foreign Exchange Hedging , 2013 .

[43]  Jan Johanson,et al.  Overcoming the Liability of Outsidership—The Challenge of HQ of the Global Firm , 2012 .

[44]  Mats Forsgren,et al.  The concept of learning in the Uppsala internationalization process model : a critical review , 2002 .

[45]  Giovanni Dosi,et al.  Organizational Capabilities, Patterns of Knowledge Accumulation and Governance Structures in Business Firms: An Introduction , 2008 .

[46]  J. March,et al.  A Behavioral Theory of the Firm , 1964 .

[47]  S. Hunt,et al.  The Commitment-Trust Theory of Relationship Marketing , 1994 .

[48]  A. Rugman.  Regional strategy and the demise of globalization , 2003 .

[49]  Constance E. Helfat,et al.  Dynamic capabilities : understanding strategic change in organizations , 2007 .

[50]  Karl P. Sauvant.  UNCTAD, World Investment Report 2004: The Shift Towards Services (Geneva and New York: United Nations, 2004). , 2004 .

[51]  G. Tomas M. Hult,et al.  A global market advantage framework: the role of global market knowledge competencies , 2005 .

[52]  R. Narula,et al.  Multinational Enterprises and Local Contexts: The Opportunities and Challenges of Multiple Embeddedness , 2011 .

[53]  Jan‐Erik Vahlne,et al.  Multinationals: The Swedish Case , 1986 .

[54]  Alain Verbeke,et al.  The Impact of Added Cultural Distance and Cultural Diversity on International Expansion Patterns: A Penrosean Perspective , 2011 .

[55]  Nicholas Athanassiou,et al.  Regional and Global Alliance Network Structures of Triad Multinational Enterprises , 2010 .

[56]  Karl P. Sauvant.  UNCTAD, World Investment Report 1993: Transnational Corporations and Integrated International Production (Geneva and New York: United Nations, 1993) , 1993 .

[57]  R. Aggarwal,et al.  What is a multinational corporation? Classifying the degree of firm-level multinationality , 2011 .

[58]  A. Rugman,et al.  A perspective on regional and global strategies of multinational enterprises , 2004 .

[59]  P. Ghauri,et al.  Globalisation, economic geography and the strategy of multinational enterprises , 2004 .

[60]  M. Porter.  The Competitive Advantage Of Nations , 1990 .