Experimental, Theoretical, and Computational Investigation of Separated Nozzle Flows

A detailed experimental, theoretical, and computational study of separated nozzle flows has been conducted. Experimental testing was performed at the NASA Langley 16-Foot Transonic Tunnel Complex. As part of a comprehensive static performance investigation, force, moment, and pressure measurements were made and schlieren flow visualization was obtained for a sub-scale, non-axisymmetric, two-dimensional, convergent- divergent nozzle. In addition, two-dimensional numerical simulations were run using the computational fluid dynamics code PAB3D with two-equation turbulence closure and algebraic Reynolds stress modeling. For reference, experimental and computational results were compared with theoretical predictions based on one-dimensional gas dynamics and an approximate integral momentum boundary layer method. Experimental results from this study indicate that off-design overexpanded nozzle flow was dominated by shock induced boundary layer separation, which was divided into two distinct flow regimes; three- dimensional separation with partial reattachment, and fully detached two-dimensional separation. The test nozzle was observed to go through a marked transition in passing from one regime to the other. In all cases, separation provided a significant increase in static thrust efficiency compared to the ideal prediction. Results indicate that with controlled separation, the entire overexpanded range of nozzle performance would be within 10% of the peak thrust efficiency. By offering savings in weight and complexity over a conventional mechanical exhaust system, this may allow a fixed geometry nozzle to cover an entire flight envelope. The computational simulation was in excellent agreement with experimental data over most of the test range, and did a good job of modeling internal flow and thrust performance. An exception occurred at low nozzle pressure ratios, where the two-dimensional computational model was inconsistent with the three-dimensional separation observed in the experiment. In general, the computation captured the physics of the shock boundary layer interaction and shock induced boundary layer separation in the nozzle, though there were some differences in shock structure compared to experiment. Though minor, these differences could be important for studies involving flow control or thrust vectoring of separated nozzles. Combined with other observations, this indicates that more detailed, three-dimensional computational modeling needs to be conducted to more realistically simulate shock-separated nozzle flows.

[1]  Khaled S. Abdol-Hamid,et al.  Application of Navier-Stokes code PAB3D with kappa-epsilon turbulence model to attached and separated flows , 1995 .

[2]  Khaled S. Abdol-Hamid,et al.  Implementation of Algebraic Stress Models in a General 3-D Navier-Stokes Method (PAB3D) , 1995 .

[3]  S. Girimaji Fully explicit and self-consistent algebraic Reynolds stress model , 1995 .

[4]  S. Paul Pao,et al.  Numerical simulation of jet aerodynamics using the three-dimensional Navier-Stokes code PAB3D , 1996 .

[5]  E. Laitone,et al.  Elements of Gasdynamics. , 1957 .

[6]  John R. Carlson,et al.  Application of Navier-Stokes Code PAB3D With k-c Turbulence Model to Attached and Separated Flows , 1995 .

[7]  J. E. Hodgson To the Editor of the Journal of the Royal Aeronautical Society , 1923 .

[8]  Hugh W. Coleman,et al.  Experimentation and Uncertainty Analysis for Engineers , 1989 .

[9]  Maurice Tucker,et al.  Effect of a Discontinuity on Turbulent Boundary-Layer-Thickness Parameters With Application to Shock-Induced Separation , 1955 .

[10]  W. G. E. Lewis,et al.  Propelling Nozzle Research , 1964, The Journal of the Royal Aeronautical Society.

[11]  R. J. Re,et al.  Static internal performance including thrust vectoring and reversing of two-dimensional convergent-divergent nozzles , 1984 .

[12]  F. J. Capone,et al.  Static performance of vectoring/reversing non-axisymmetric nozzles , 1979 .

[13]  Charles E. Mercer,et al.  Data reduction formulas for the 16-foot transonic tunnel: NASA Langley Research Center, revision 2 , 1992 .

[14]  J. Carlson,et al.  High Reynolds number analysis of flat plate and separated afterbody flow using non-linear turbulence models , 1996 .

[15]  J. Lumley,et al.  A new Reynolds stress algebraic equation model , 1994 .

[16]  T. Gatski,et al.  On explicit algebraic stress models for complex turbulent flows , 1992, Journal of Fluid Mechanics.

[17]  C Asbury Scott,et al.  A Passive Cavity Concept for Improving the Off-Design Performance of Fixed Geometry Exhaust Nozzles , 1996 .

[18]  M. L. Mason,et al.  Static Investigation of a Multiaxis Thrust- Vectoring Nozzle With Variable Internal Contouring Ability , 1997 .

[19]  Leonard M. Weinstein,et al.  An improved large-field focusing schlieren system , 1991 .

[20]  Ronald D. Joslin,et al.  Overview of active flow control at NASA Langley Research Center , 1998, Smart Structures.