Intraobserver and interobserver variability in GTV delineation on FDG-PET-CT images of head and neck cancers.

PURPOSE To determine if the addition of fluorodeoxyglucose positron emission tomography (FDG-PET) data changes primary site gross tumor volumes (GTVs) in head and neck cancers. METHODS AND MATERIALS Computed tomography (CT), contrast-enhanced CT, and FDG-PET-CT scans were obtained in 10 patients with head and neck cancers. Eight experienced observers (6 head and neck oncologists and 2 neuro-radiologists) with access to clinical and radiologic reports outlined primary site GTVs on each modality. Three cases were recontoured twice to assess intraobserver variability. The magnitudes of the GTVs were compared. Intra- and interobserver variability was assessed by a two-way repeated measures analysis of variance. Inter- and intraobserver reliability were calculated. RESULTS There were no significant differences in the GTVs across the image modalities when compared as ensemble averages; the Wilcoxon matched-pairs signed-rank test showed that CT volumes were larger than PET-CT. Observers demonstrated the greatest consistency and were most interchangeable on contrast-enhanced CT; they performed less reliably on PET-CT. CONCLUSIONS The addition of PET-CT to primary site GTV delineation of head and neck cancers does not change the volume of the GTV defined by this group of expert observers in this patient sample. An FDG-PET may demonstrate differences in neck node delineation and in other disease sites.

[1]  Morand Piert,et al.  Hypoxia-specific tumor imaging with 18F-fluoroazomycin arabinoside. , 2005, Journal of nuclear medicine : official publication, Society of Nuclear Medicine.

[2]  David Schuster,et al.  Comparison of CT- and FDG-PET-defined gross tumor volume in intensity-modulated radiotherapy for head-and-neck cancer. , 2005, International journal of radiation oncology, biology, physics.

[3]  Sadek Nehmeh,et al.  Does registration of PET and planning CT images decrease interobserver and intraobserver variation in delineating tumor volumes for non-small-cell lung cancer? , 2005, International journal of radiation oncology, biology, physics.

[4]  Di Yan,et al.  Defining a radiotherapy target with positron emission tomography. , 2002, International journal of radiation oncology, biology, physics.

[5]  Anne Bol,et al.  Tri-dimensional automatic segmentation of PET volumes based on measured source-to-background ratios: influence of reconstruction algorithms. , 2003, Radiotherapy and oncology : journal of the European Society for Therapeutic Radiology and Oncology.

[6]  S. Larson,et al.  Imaging transgene expression with radionuclide imaging technologies. , 2000, Neoplasia.

[7]  Cyrill Burger,et al.  Radiation treatment planning with an integrated positron emission and computer tomography (PET/CT): a feasibility study. , 2003, International journal of radiation oncology, biology, physics.

[8]  J. R. Landis,et al.  The measurement of observer agreement for categorical data. , 1977, Biometrics.

[9]  J. Fleiss,et al.  Intraclass correlations: uses in assessing rater reliability. , 1979, Psychological bulletin.

[10]  Wilson Roa,et al.  A local contrast based approach to threshold segmentation for PET target volume delineation. , 2006, Medical physics.

[11]  M. Eliasziw,et al.  Statistical methodology for the concurrent assessment of interrater and intrarater reliability: using goniometric measurements as an example. , 1994, Physical therapy.

[12]  A Fenster,et al.  Quantification of multiple sclerosis lesion volumes in 1.5 and 0.5 T anisotropically filtered and unfiltered MR exams. , 1996, Medical physics.

[13]  A. Riegel,et al.  Variability of gross tumor volume delineation in head-and-neck cancer using CT and PET/CT fusion. , 2005, International journal of radiation oncology, biology, physics.

[14]  Tohru Shiga,et al.  Image fusion between 18FDG-PET and MRI/CT for radiotherapy planning of oropharyngeal and nasopharyngeal carcinomas. , 2002, International journal of radiation oncology, biology, physics.

[15]  C B Caldwell,et al.  Observer variation in contouring gross tumor volume in patients with poorly defined non-small-cell lung tumors on CT: the impact of 18FDG-hybrid PET fusion. , 2001, International journal of radiation oncology, biology, physics.

[16]  Dwight E Heron,et al.  Hybrid PET-CT simulation for radiation treatment planning in head-and-neck cancers: a brief technical report. , 2004, International journal of radiation oncology, biology, physics.

[17]  S. Tong,et al.  Intra- and inter-observer variability and reliability of prostate volume measurement via two-dimensional and three-dimensional ultrasound imaging. , 1998, Ultrasound in medicine & biology.

[18]  Mohamed Allaoua,et al.  Prediction of outcome in head-and-neck cancer patients using the standardized uptake value of 2-[18F]fluoro-2-deoxy-D-glucose. , 2004, International journal of radiation oncology, biology, physics.

[19]  Yoshimi Anzai,et al.  FDG‐PET/CT–guided intensity modulated head and neck radiotherapy: A pilot investigation , 2005, Head & neck.

[20]  Marcel van Herk,et al.  Observer variation in target volume delineation of lung cancer related to radiation oncologist-computer interaction: a 'Big Brother' evaluation. , 2005, Radiotherapy and oncology : journal of the European Society for Therapeutic Radiology and Oncology.

[21]  Dean Billheimer,et al.  Prospective feasibility trial of radiotherapy target definition for head and neck cancer using 3-dimensional PET and CT imaging. , 2004, Journal of nuclear medicine : official publication, Society of Nuclear Medicine.

[22]  B. Murray,et al.  Thresholding in PET images of static and moving targets , 2005, Physics in medicine and biology.

[23]  Jean-François Daisne,et al.  Tumor volume in pharyngolaryngeal squamous cell carcinoma: comparison at CT, MR imaging, and FDG PET and validation with surgical specimen. , 2004, Radiology.

[24]  A. Fenster,et al.  The variability of manual and computer assisted quantification of multiple sclerosis lesion volumes. , 1996, Medical physics.

[25]  Matthias Reimold,et al.  Prognostic impact of hypoxia imaging with 18F-misonidazole PET in non-small cell lung cancer and head and neck cancer before radiotherapy. , 2005, Journal of nuclear medicine : official publication, Society of Nuclear Medicine.