Background This study was to compare the postoperative complication rates of continuous ambulatory peritoneal dialysis (CAPD) catheter insertion via open technique between two groups of patients, those with and those without a history of previous abdominal surgery. Methods A review was carried out in 122 patients over a 2-year period. The patients were divided into two groups: those with and those without previous lower abdominal surgery. All patient records were retrospectively analyzed until the time of catheter failure or to current time if alive and receiving CAPD. Patient characteristics, operative factors, and postoperative complications were recorded. Results Postoperative complications were reported as catheter malfunction in 16 patients and CAPD-related peritonitis in 36 patients. The complication rates in the group of patients with previous abdominal surgery were 16.7% catheter malfunction and 33.3% CAPD-related peritonitis. In patients without previous lower abdominal surgery, a catheter malfunction rate of 12.5% and a peritonitis rate of 28.8% were seen. The operation time in patients with previous abdominal surgery was longer than that in patients without previous abdominal surgery. However, no statistically significant difference in postoperative complication rates was detected between patients with and patients without previous lower abdominal surgery. Conclusion CAPD remains a reliable modality in the treatment of end-stage renal disease and does not increase postoperative complications in patients with previous abdominal surgery.
[1]
H. Tiong,et al.
Surgical complications of Tenckhoff catheters used in continuous ambulatory peritoneal dialysis.
,
2006,
Singapore medical journal.
[2]
F. Finkelstein,et al.
Treatment and outcome of CPD-associated peritonitis.
,
2006,
Annals of clinical microbiology and antimicrobials.
[3]
M. Moreiras-Plaza,et al.
Peritoneal dialysis catheter obstruction caused by Fallopian tube wrapping.
,
2004,
American journal of kidney diseases : the official journal of the National Kidney Foundation.
[4]
A. Kliger,et al.
Continuous peritoneal dialysis-associated peritonitis: a review and current concepts.
,
2003,
Seminars in dialysis.
[5]
G. Paternoster,et al.
Peritoneal dialysis compared with hemodialysis in the treatment of end-stage renal disease.
,
2000,
Journal of nephrology.
[6]
J. Sobrado,et al.
Mechanical complications in chronic peritoneal dialysis.
,
1999,
Clinical nephrology.
[7]
H. Tenckhoff,et al.
A bacteriologically safe peritoneal access device.
,
1968,
Transactions - American Society for Artificial Internal Organs.