Plankton biodiversity along a gradient of productivity and its mediation by macrophytes.

We studied the effect of aquatic vegetation on the process of species sorting and community assembly of three functional groups of plankton organisms (phytoplankton, seston-feeding zooplankton, and substrate-dwelling zooplankton) along a primary productivity gradient. We performed an outdoor cattle tank experiment (n = 60) making an orthogonal combination of a primary productivity gradient (four nutrient addition levels: 0, 10, 100, and 1000 microg P/L; N/P ratio: 16) with a vegetation gradient (no macrophytes, artificial macrophytes, and real Elodea nuttallii). We used artificial plants to evaluate the mere effects of plant physical structure independently from other plant effects, such as competition for nutrients or allelopathy. The tanks were inoculated with species-rich mixtures of phytoplankton and zooplankton. Both productivity and macrophytes affected community structure and diversity of the three functional groups. Taxon richness declined with increasing plankton productivity in each functional group according to a nested subset pattern. We found no evidence for unimodal diversity-productivity relationships. The proportional abundance of Daphnia and of colonial Scenedesmus increased strongly with productivity. GLM analyses suggest that the decline in richness of seston feeders was due to competitive exclusion by Daphnia at high productivity. The decline in richness of phytoplankton was probably caused by high Daphnia grazing. However, partial analyses indicate that these explanations do not entirely explain the patterns. Possibly, environmental deterioration associated with high productivity (e.g., high pH) was also responsible for the observed richness decline. Macrophytes had positive effects on the taxon richness of all three functional plankton groups and interacted with the initial productivity gradient in determining their communities. Macrophytes affected the composition and diversity of the three functional groups both by their physical structure and through other mechanisms. Part of the macrophyte effect may be indirect via a reduction of phytoplankton production. Our results also indirectly suggest that the often reported unimodal relationship between primary productivity and diversity in nature may be partially mediated by the tendency of submerged macrophytes to be most abundant at intermediate productivity levels.

[1]  K. L. Cottingham,et al.  THE RELATIONSHIP IN LAKE COMMUNITIES BETWEEN PRIMARY PRODUCTIVITY AND SPECIES RICHNESS , 2000 .

[2]  Dag O. Hessen,et al.  Morphological changes in Scenedesmus induced by substances released from Daphnia , 1993 .

[3]  T. Fukami,et al.  Productivity–biodiversity relationships depend on the history of community assembly , 2003, Nature.

[4]  Miguel A. Rodríguez-Gironés,et al.  A new algorithm to calculate the nestedness temperature of presence–absence matrices , 2006 .

[5]  Michael L. Rosenzweig,et al.  Species Diversity in Space and Time , 1997 .

[6]  Jonathan M. Chase,et al.  Strong and weak trophic cascades along a productivity gradient , 2003 .

[7]  A. Magurran,et al.  Biological diversity : the coexistence of species on changing landscapes , 1994 .

[8]  D. Tilman Species Richness of Experimental Productivity Gradients: How Important is Colonization Limitation? , 1993 .

[9]  E. Donk,et al.  Impact of submerged macrophytes including charophytes on phyto- and zooplankton communities: allelopathy versus other mechanisms , 2002 .

[10]  Christopher F. Steiner Keystone predator effects and grazer control of planktonic primary production , 2003 .

[11]  Katherine L. Gross,et al.  WHAT IS THE OBSERVED RELATIONSHIP BETWEEN SPECIES RICHNESS AND PRODUCTIVITY , 2001 .

[12]  Jonathan M. Chase,et al.  Connectivity, scale‐dependence, and the productivity–diversity relationship , 2004 .

[13]  Erik Jeppesen,et al.  Trophic structure, species richness and biodiversity in Danish lakes: changes along a phosphorus gradient , 2000 .

[14]  Miquel Lürling,et al.  The effect of substances from different zooplankton species and fish on the induction of defensive morphology in the green alga Scenedesmus obliquus , 2003 .

[15]  G. Bell,et al.  Diversity peaks at intermediate productivity in a laboratory microcosm , 2000, Nature.

[16]  L. Oksanen,et al.  Exploitation Ecosystems in Gradients of Primary Productivity , 1981, The American Naturalist.

[17]  L. Dyer,et al.  Top‐down and bottom‐up diversity cascades in detrital vs. living food webs , 2002 .

[18]  S. Dodson,et al.  LAND USE, WATER CHEMISTRY, AQUATIC VEGETATION, AND ZOOPLANKTON COMMUNITY STRUCTURE OF SHALLOW LAKES , 2005 .

[19]  J. López-Ramos,et al.  MULTI‐GROUP BIODIVERSITY IN SHALLOW LAKES ALONG GRADIENTS OF PHOSPHORUS AND WATER PLANT COVER , 2005 .

[20]  M. Leibold Biodiversity and nutrient enrichment in pond plankton communities , 1999 .

[21]  Ter Braak,et al.  Canoco reference manual and CanoDraw for Windows user''s guide: software for canonical community ord , 2002 .

[22]  Mathew A. Leibold,et al.  A Graphical Model of Keystone Predators in Food Webs: Trophic Regulation of Abundance, Incidence, and Diversity Patterns in Communities , 1996, The American Naturalist.

[23]  Michel Loreau,et al.  Functional diversity governs ecosystem response to nutrient enrichment , 2000, Nature.

[24]  M. Scheffer,et al.  Alternative equilibria in shallow lakes. , 1993, Trends in ecology & evolution.

[25]  S. Dodson,et al.  LAND USE, PRIMARY PRODUCTIVITY, AND LAKE AREA AS DESCRIPTORS OF ZOOPLANKTON DIVERSITY , 2005 .

[26]  Jonathan M. Chase,et al.  Spatial scale dictates the productivity–biodiversity relationship , 2002, Nature.

[27]  Ulrich Sommer,et al.  Consumer versus resource control of species diversity and ecosystem functioning , 2002, Nature.

[28]  P. Abrams Monotonic or unimodal diversity-productivity gradients : what does competition theory predict? , 1995 .

[29]  L. Meester,et al.  METACOMMUNITY STRUCTURE: SYNERGY OF BIOTIC INTERACTIONS AS SELECTIVE AGENTS AND DISPERSAL AS FUEL , 2004 .

[30]  M. Kondoh Unifying the relationships of species richness to productivity and disturbance , 2001, Proceedings of the Royal Society of London. Series B: Biological Sciences.

[31]  A. Mazumder,et al.  REVERSAL OF GRAZING IMPACT ON PLANT SPECIES RICHNESS IN NUTRIENT‐POOR VS. NUTRIENT‐RICH ECOSYSTEMS , 1998 .

[32]  D. Tilman Resource competition and community structure. , 1983, Monographs in population biology.

[33]  M. Boersma,et al.  Decrease in Daphnia egg viability at elevated pH , 1996 .