View-specific coding of face shape.

Monkey and human cortex contain view-specific face neurons, but it remains unclear whether they code face shape. We tested the view specificity of face-shape coding by inducing figural face aftereffects at one viewpoint (3/4 left) and testing generalization to different viewpoints (front view and 3/4 right). The aftereffects were induced by adaptation to consistent figural distortions (contracted or expanded), which shifts the distortion perceived as most normal toward the adapting distortion. The strong aftereffect that was observed at the adapting view was significantly and substantially reduced for both front-view test faces and mirror-image (3/4 right) test faces, indicating view specificity. The limited transfer across mirror views is strong evidence of view specificity, given their figural similarity. The aftereffects survived a size change between adaptation and test faces (Experiment 2), a result that rules out low-level adaptation as an explanation. These results provide strong evidence that face-shape coding is view-specific.

[1]  M. Tarr,et al.  Testing conditions for viewpoint invariance in object recognition. , 1997, Journal of experimental psychology. Human perception and performance.

[2]  G. Rhodes,et al.  Orientation-Contingent Face Aftereffects and Implications for Face-Coding Mechanisms , 2004, Current Biology.

[3]  Sheng He,et al.  Viewer-Centered Object Representation in the Human Visual System Revealed by Viewpoint Aftereffects , 2005, Neuron.

[4]  W. Hayward.  After the viewpoint debate: where next in object recognition? , 2003, Trends in Cognitive Sciences.

[5]  A. O'Toole,et al.  Prototype-referenced shape encoding revealed by high-level aftereffects , 2001, Nature Neuroscience.

[6]  M J Tarr,et al.  Is human object recognition better described by geon structural descriptions or by multiple views? Comment on Biederman and Gerhardstein (1993). , 1995, Journal of experimental psychology. Human perception and performance.

[7]  C. Chubb,et al.  The size-tuning of the face-distortion after-effect , 2001, Vision Research.

[8]  Avi Chaudhuri,et al.  Reassessing the 3/4 view effect in face recognition , 2002, Cognition.

[9]  Otto H. MacLin,et al.  Figural aftereffects in the perception of faces , 1999, Psychonomic bulletin & review.

[10]  M. Harries,et al.  Viewer-centred and object-centred coding of heads in the macaque temporal cortex , 2004, Experimental Brain Research.

[11]  T. Valentine,et al.  Recognizing Unfamiliar Faces: The Effects of Distinctiveness and View , 1999, The Quarterly journal of experimental psychology. A, Human experimental psychology.

[12]  J. Haxby,et al.  The distributed human neural system for face perception , 2000, Trends in Cognitive Sciences.

[13]  S. Edelman,et al.  Differential Processing of Objects under Various Viewing Conditions in the Human Lateral Occipital Complex , 1999, Neuron.

[14]  A. J. Mistlin,et al.  Visual cells in the temporal cortex sensitive to face view and gaze direction , 1985, Proceedings of the Royal Society of London. Series B. Biological Sciences.

[15]  H. Bülthoff,et al.  Face recognition under varying poses: The role of texture and shape , 1996, Vision Research.

[16]  D I Perrett,et al.  Organization and functions of cells responsive to faces in the temporal cortex. , 1992, Philosophical transactions of the Royal Society of London. Series B, Biological sciences.

[17]  D Kersten,et al.  Viewpoint-Dependent Recognition of Familiar Faces , 1999, Perception.

[18]  V. Bruce,et al.  The basis of the 3/4 view advantage in face recognition , 1987 .

[19]  Satoru Suzuki,et al.  High-level Pattern Coding Revealed by Brief Shape Aftereffects , 2005 .

[20]  G. Rhodes,et al.  Adaptive norm-based coding of facial identity , 2006, Vision Research.

[21]  Irving Biederman,et al.  One-shot viewpoint invariance in matching novel objects , 1999, Vision Research.

[22]  T. Busey,et al.  The contribution of symmetry and motion to the recognition of faces at novel orientations , 2004, Memory & cognition.

[23]  C. Clifford,et al.  Pulling Faces: An Investigation of the Face-Distortion Aftereffect , 2003, Perception.

[24]  Z Kourtzi,et al.  fMRI Adaptation: A Technique for Studying Visual Representations in the Primate Brain , 2005 .

[25]  Irving Biederman,et al.  Viewpoint-Dependent Mechanisms in Visual Object Recognition : Reply to Tarr and Biilthoff ( 1995 ) , 2004 .

[26]  J. Haxby,et al.  Human neural systems for face recognition and social communication , 2002, Biological Psychiatry.

[27]  A. O'Toole,et al.  Probing the Visual Representation of Faces With Adaptation , 2006, Psychological science.

[28]  H H Bülthoff,et al.  Psychophysical support for a two-dimensional view interpolation theory of object recognition. , 1992, Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America.

[29]  K. Nakayama,et al.  Fitting the mind to the World , 2003, Psychological science.

[30]  Keiji Tanaka,et al.  Optical Imaging of Functional Organization in the Monkey Inferotemporal Cortex , 1996, Science.

[31]  Michael J. Tarr.  Is human object recognition better described by geon structural description or by multiple views , 1995 .