Comparison of Model Based Predictive Control and Fuzzy Logic Control of a DFIG with an Indirect Matrix Converter

In this paper two control techniques: Finite States - Model Based Predictive Control (FS - MBPC) and Fuzzy Logic Control (FLC) are developed to obtain arbitrary output currents, needed in a variable speed Wind Energy Conversion System (WECS). In this study, the simulation performance between FS-MBPC and FLC of the rotor current in a Doubly Fed Induction Generator (DFIG) with an Indirect Matrix Converter is evaluated. The simulations were carried out with constant shaft speed, and constant ramp speed with arbitrary rotor current references. Both FS-MBPC and FLC showed very high performance, following smoothly and rapidly the current reference with a very low error. The FS-MBPC dynamic response is slightly better than of the FLC. However, fewer mathematical calculations, and less measured data, and fewer computational requirements suggest that FLC can be easier to implement in FPGAs instead of composite microprocessor-based control platforms.

[1]  M. Rivera,et al.  Predictive control of the Indirect Matrix Converter with active damping , 2009, 2009 IEEE 6th International Power Electronics and Motion Control Conference.

[2]  José R. Rodríguez,et al.  Matrix converters: a technology review , 2002, IEEE Trans. Ind. Electron..

[3]  Johann W. Kolar,et al.  Comprehensive comparison of three-phase AC-AC Matrix Converter and Voltage DC-Link Back-to-Back Converter systems , 2010, The 2010 International Power Electronics Conference - ECCE ASIA -.

[4]  Patrick Wheeler,et al.  Control of a doubly-fed induction generator via a Direct Two-stage Power Converter , 2008 .

[5]  M. E. Macias,et al.  Model predictive control of a Doubly Fed Induction Generator with an Indirect Matrix Converter , 2010, IECON 2010 - 36th Annual Conference on IEEE Industrial Electronics Society.

[6]  Li Yongdong,et al.  Research on the Amplitude Coefficient for Multilevel Matrix Converter Space Vector Modulation , 2012, IEEE Transactions on Power Electronics.

[7]  J.W. Kolar,et al.  The essence of three-phase AC/AC converter systems , 2008, 2008 13th International Power Electronics and Motion Control Conference.

[8]  J.L. Elizondo,et al.  Matrix Converters Applied to Wind Energy Conversion Systems, Technologies and Investigation Trends , 2009, 2009 Electronics, Robotics and Automotive Mechanics Conference (CERMA).

[9]  Roberto Cárdenas,et al.  Analysis and Experimental Validation of Control Systems for Four-Leg Matrix Converter Applications , 2012, IEEE Transactions on Industrial Electronics.

[10]  Vincent Wertz,et al.  Fuzzy Logic, Identification and Predictive Control , 2004 .

[11]  Lie Xu,et al.  Model-Based Predictive Direct Power Control of Doubly Fed Induction Generators , 2010, IEEE Transactions on Power Electronics.

[12]  U. Ammann,et al.  Model Predictive Control—A Simple and Powerful Method to Control Power Converters , 2009, IEEE Transactions on Industrial Electronics.

[13]  José R. Espinoza,et al.  Instantaneous Reactive Power Minimization and Current Control for an Indirect Matrix Converter Under a Distorted AC Supply , 2012, IEEE Transactions on Industrial Informatics.

[14]  M. E. Macias,et al.  Rotor current fuzzy control of a DFIG with an Indirect Matrix Converter , 2011, IECON 2011 - 37th Annual Conference of the IEEE Industrial Electronics Society.

[15]  Barry W. Williams,et al.  Predictive Current Control of Doubly Fed Induction Generators , 2009, IEEE Transactions on Industrial Electronics.

[16]  Johann W. Kolar,et al.  Predictive Control of an Indirect Matrix Converter , 2008, IEEE Transactions on Industrial Electronics.

[17]  Roberto Cárdenas,et al.  Control of a Doubly Fed Induction Generator via an Indirect Matrix Converter With Changing DC Voltage , 2011, IEEE Transactions on Industrial Electronics.