A novel method of dynamic correction in the time domain

The dynamic error of measured signals is sometimes unacceptably large. If the dynamic properties of the measurement system are known, the true physical signal may to some extent be re-constructed. With a parametrized characterization of the system and sampled signals, time-domain digital filters may be utilized for correction. In the present work a general method for synthesizing such correction filters is developed. It maps the dynamic parameters of the measurement system directly on to the filter coefficients and utilizes time reversed filtering. This avoids commonly used numerical optimization in the filter synthesis. The method of correction is simple with absolute repeatability and stability, and results in a low residual error. Explicit criteria to control both the horizontal (time) and vertical (amplitude) discretization errors are presented in terms of the utilization of bandwidth and noise gain, respectively. To evaluate how close to optimal the correction is, these errors are also formulated in relation to the signal-to-noise ratio of the original measurement system. For purposes of illustration, typical mechanical and piezo-electric transducer systems for measuring force, pressure or acceleration are simulated and dynamically corrected with such dedicated digital filters.

[1]  J P Hessling,et al.  A novel method of estimating dynamic measurement errors , 2006 .

[2]  Fredrik Gustafsson,et al.  Determining the initial states in forward-backward filtering , 1996, IEEE Trans. Signal Process..

[3]  Alfred Link,et al.  Identifikation von Beschleunigungsaufnehmern mit hochintensiven Stößen (Accelerometer Identification by High Shock Intensities) , 2005 .

[4]  Rudi Vuerinckx Design of high-order Chebyshev FIR filters in the complex domain under magnitude constraints , 1998, IEEE Trans. Signal Process..

[5]  Rik Pintelon,et al.  Complicated procedures made easy [GUI] , 2003 .

[6]  Clemens Elster,et al.  Analysis of dynamic measurements and determination of time-dependent measurement uncertainty using a second-order model , 2007 .

[7]  G. Goodwin,et al.  Interrelations between continuous and discrete lattice filter structures , 1991, [1991] Proceedings of the 30th IEEE Conference on Decision and Control.

[8]  Anshi Chen,et al.  Correction of Signal Distortion Resulting from Measurement Systems Limitation , 2007 .

[9]  Yves Rolain,et al.  Another step towards an ideal data acquisition channel , 1991 .

[10]  T. Kailath Lectures on Wiener and Kalman Filtering , 2003 .

[11]  M. P. Ekstrom,et al.  Baseband Distortion Equalization in the Transmission of Pulse Information , 1972 .

[12]  Noise in a quantum point contact due to a fluctuating impurity configuration , 1994, cond-mat/9408081.

[13]  A. L. Shestakov,et al.  Dynamic error correction method , 1996 .

[14]  Norbert Wiener,et al.  Extrapolation, Interpolation, and Smoothing of Stationary Time Series , 1964 .

[15]  Gerd Vandersteen,et al.  An Iterative Method to Stabilize a Transfer Function in the$s$- and$z$-Domains , 2006, IEEE Transactions on Instrumentation and Measurement.

[16]  Yves Rolain,et al.  Towards an ideal data acquisition channel , 1989 .

[17]  John P Bentley,et al.  Principles of measurement systems , 1983 .

[18]  R. Dénos,et al.  Digital compensation of pressure sensors in the time domain , 2002 .

[19]  F. F. Liu,et al.  Extending Transducer Transient Response by Electronic Compensation for High‐Speed Physical Measurements , 1958 .