Online vs. Face-to-Face Deliberation: Effects on Civic Engagement

Deliberation is considered to produce positive effects on public opinion, in that it exposes participants to alternative perspectives and rational arguments. However, whereas benefits of face-to-face deliberation have been supported by many empirical studies, the effects of online deliberation remain unclear to date. This research compares the effects of online and face-to-face deliberation in experimental settings. A theoretical review of computer-mediated communication and deliberative democracy suggests that online deliberation is not necessarily inferior to face-to-face deliberation. An experiment was conducted to compare the relative outcomes of a deliberation performed in face-to-face and computer-mediated settings. The results suggest that both online and face-to-face deliberation can increase participants’ issue knowledge, political efficacy, and willingness to participate in politics.

[1]  Robert D. Putnam,et al.  Bowling alone: the collapse and revival of American community , 2000, CSCW '00.

[2]  J. Bryce,et al.  The American Commonwealth Vol I , 1888 .

[3]  Stephen K. White,et al.  Between Facts and Norms: Contributions to a Discourse Theory of Law and Democracy@@@The Cambridge Companion to Habermas , 1997 .

[4]  R. Niemi,et al.  Measuring Internal Political Efficacy in the 1988 National Election Study , 1991, American Political Science Review.

[5]  J. Habermas.  The Structural Transformation of the Public Sphere , 1962 .

[6]  S. Keeter,et al.  What Americans Know about Politics and Why It Matters , 1996 .

[7]  Russell Spears,et al.  Computer-Mediated Communication, De-Individuation and Group Decision-Making , 1991, Int. J. Man Mach. Stud..

[8]  T. Postmes,et al.  Breaching or Building Social Boundaries? Side-Effects of Computer-Mediated Communication. , 2002 .

[9]  B. Sweetman.  Between Facts and Norms: Contributions to a Discourse Theory of Law and Democracy , 1997 .

[10]  D. Myers,et al.  The group polarization phenomenon. , 1976 .

[11]  John Gastil,et al.  The Deliberative Democracy Handbook: Strategies For Effective Civic Engagement In The Twenty-First Century , 2005 .

[12]  Tali Mendelberg,et al.  Race and Public Deliberation , 2000 .

[13]  R. Rice.  Media Appropriateness Using Social Presence Theory to Compare Traditional and New Organizational Media , 1993 .

[14]  James S. Fishkin,et al.  Bringing Deliberation to the Democratic Dialogue , 1999 .

[15]  Terence H. Qualter,et al.  Democracy and the Market , 1991 .

[16]  L. Sanders,et al.  Against Deliberation , 1997 .

[17]  S. Chambers,et al.  Reasonable Democracy: Jürgen Habermas and the Politics of Discourse , 1996 .

[18]  Robert O. Wyatt.  The Poll with a Human Face: The National Issues Convention Experiment in Political Communication , 2000 .

[19]  B. Barber.  Strong Democracy: Participatory Politics for a New Age , 1985 .

[20]  Alain Boyer.  Democracy and Disagreement , 1995 .

[21]  Elihu Katz,et al.  News, Talk, Opinion, Participation: The Part Played by Conversation in Deliberative Democracy , 1999 .

[22]  Daniel Kahneman,et al.  Deliberating About Dollars: The Severity Shift , 2000 .

[23]  J. Habermas.  The theory of communicative action: Lifeworld and system - A critique of functionalist reason , 1990 .

[24]  M. McCombs,et al.  The poll with a human face : the National Issues Convention experiment in political communication , 1999 .

[25]  Donald R. Kinder.  Pale democracy: Opinion and action in postwar America , 2004 .

[26]  Richard L. Daft,et al.  Organizational information requirements, media richness and structural design , 1986 .

[27]  J. Habermas,et al.  The Theory of Communicative Action, Vol. 1, Reason and the Rationalization of Society , 1986 .

[28]  John Short,et al.  The social psychology of telecommunications , 1976 .

[29]  Carol J. Williams,et al.  The Role of Attitude Accessibility in the Attitude-to-Behavior Process , 1989 .

[30]  David W. Park,et al.  Interpersonal Effects in Computer-Mediated Interaction , 1994 .

[31]  Russell Spears,et al.  COMPUTER-MEDIATED COMMUNICATION, DEINDIVIDUATION AND GROUP DECISION-MAKING , 1991 .

[32]  M. D. Carpini,et al.  Public deliberation, discursive participation, and citizen engagement: A review of the empirical literature , 2004 .

[33]  C. Sunstein.  Republic.com , 2001 .

[34]  John Gastil,et al.  A Conceptual Definition and Theoretical Model of Public Deliberation in Small Face—to—Face Groups , 2002 .

[35]  C. Nemeth.  Differential contributions of majority and minority influence , 1986 .

[36]  Joshua Cohen,et al.  DELIBERATION AND DEMOCRATIC LEGITIMACY , 2005, Philosophy, Politics, Democracy.

[37]  C. Calhoun,et al.  Habermas and the Public Sphere. , 1993 .

[38]  Andrew F. Hayes,et al.  SPSS procedures for approximate randomization tests , 1998 .

[39]  J. P. Eveland.  The Effect of Political Discussion in Producing Informed Citizens: The Roles of Information, Motivation, and Elaboration , 2004 .

[40]  James S. Fishkin,et al.  Considered Opinions: Deliberative Polling in Britain , 2002 .

[41]  Tali Mendelberg.  THE DELIBERATIVE CITIZEN: THEORY AND EVIDENCE , 2009 .

[42]  E. Mansfield,et al.  The Evolution of Political Knowledge: Theory and Inquiry in American Politics , 2004 .

[43]  F. Mathews,et al.  Politics for People: Finding a Responsible Public Voice , 1994 .

[44]  Nicholas Garnham,et al.  Habermas and the public sphere , 2007 .

[45]  John Gastil,et al.  Increasing Political Sophistication Through Public Deliberation , 1999 .

[46]  Stephen L. Elkin.  Democracy and Deliberation: New Directions for Democratic Reform , 1991 .

[47]  Mark E. Warren,et al.  Democratic Theory and Self-Transformation , 1992, American Political Science Review.

[48]  B. Cruikshank.  Inclusion and democracy. , 2002 .

[49]  S. Finkel.  Reciprocal Effects of Participation and Political Efficacy: A Panel Analysis , 1985 .

[50]  R. Spears,et al.  Social influence and the influence of the 'social' in computer-mediated communication. , 1992 .

[51]  J. Cappella,et al.  Does Disagreement Contribute to More Deliberative Opinion? , 2002 .

[52]  J. Dewey,et al.  The Public and its Problems , 1927 .

[53]  J. Habermas.  The Theory of Communicative Action: Reason and the Rationalization of Society , 1986 .

[54]  Deirdre Curtin,et al.  Postnational Democracy, the EUropean Union in Search of A Political Philosophy , 1997 .

[55]  F. C. P. Motta.  The theory of communicative action , 1991 .