Impact of CT attenuation correction by SPECT/CT in brain perfusion images

PurposeThe aim of this study was to elucidate the regional differences between brain perfusion single photon emission computed tomography (SPECT) images reconstructed with a uniform attenuation correction using Chang’s method (AC-Chang) and a non-uniform attenuation correction with CT using SPECT/CT (AC-CT).MethodsSPECT images of a phantom with and without head holder were obtained, and reconstructed images of AC-Chang and AC-CT were compared. Twenty-eight consecutive patients with brain disease examined by SPECT/CT brain perfusion imaging were selected, and images were reconstructed with AC-Chang and AC-CT. The AC-Chang and AC-CT reconstructed images were then compared by voxel-based analysis using three-dimensional stereotactic surface projections.ResultsCounts in the frontal area of the AC-Chang phantom image with head holder were higher than those in the posterior area. Counts in the frontal area of the AC-Chang clinical images were significantly higher than those in the AC-CT images, while the counts in the margin of the frontal lobe and posterior margin of the parietal, occipital cortices and cerebellum of the AC-Chang images were significantly lower. Relative frontal perfusion was 5.0% higher and relative cerebellar perfusion was 4.6% lower in the AC-Chang images relative to the AC-CT images, on average.ConclusionWe demonstrated the frontal dominant hyper-perfusion and parieto-occipital and cerebellar hypo-perfusion in brain SPECT images reconstructed with AC-Chang compared to those reconstructed with AC-CT. We suggest that to obtain an accurate attenuation-corrected brain perfusion SPECT image, attenuation correction by Chang’s method is inadequate.

[1]  P. Dupont,et al.  The Role of CT-Based Attenuation Correction and Collimator Blurring Correction in Striatal Spect Quantification , 2011, International journal of molecular imaging.

[2]  SPECTCT cerebral perfusion scintigraphy; is the low-dose CT component of diagnostic value? , 2008, Clinical radiology.

[3]  Joachim Hornegger,et al.  Quantitative Accuracy of Clinical 99mTc SPECT/CT Using Ordered-Subset Expectation Maximization with 3-Dimensional Resolution Recovery, Attenuation, and Scatter Correction , 2010, Journal of Nuclear Medicine.

[4]  J Hashimoto,et al.  Scatter and attenuation correction in technetium-99m brain SPECT. , 1997, Journal of nuclear medicine : official publication, Society of Nuclear Medicine.

[5]  L. Johansson,et al.  A method for attenuation and scatter correction of brain SPECT based on computed tomography images , 2003, Nuclear medicine communications.

[6]  I. Narabayashi,et al.  Comparison of methods of attenuation and scatter correction in brain perfusion SPECT. , 2005, Journal of nuclear medicine technology.

[7]  A. Martineau,et al.  CT Nonuniform Attenuation and TEW Scatter Corrections in Brain Tc-99m ECD SPECT , 2011, Clinical nuclear medicine.

[8]  H. Bergmann,et al.  Comparison of advanced iterative reconstruction methods for SPECT/CT. , 2012, Zeitschrift fur medizinische Physik.

[9]  F S Prato,et al.  Importance of bone attenuation in brain SPECT quantification. , 1998, Journal of nuclear medicine : official publication, Society of Nuclear Medicine.

[10]  Michel Koole,et al.  Non-uniform versus uniform attenuation correction in brain perfusion SPET of healthy volunteers , 2001, European Journal of Nuclear Medicine.

[11]  Torsten Kuwert,et al.  A review on the clinical uses of SPECT/CT , 2010, European Journal of Nuclear Medicine and Molecular Imaging.