Comparison of objective and subjective measures of cochlear compression in normal-hearing and hearing-impaired listeners

Among several behavioural methods for estimating the basilar membrane input/output function, the temporal masking curve is the most popular. Distortion product otoacoustic emissions provide an objective measure for estimating cochlear compression. However, estimates from both methods have been poorly correlated in previous studies. We hypothesise that this could be due to the interplay between generator and reflection components in the recorded otoacoustic emissions. Here, compression estimates obtained with the two methods were compared at three audiometric frequencies (1, 2, and 4 kHz) for 10 normal-hearing and 6 hearing-impaired listeners. Distortion-product otoacoustic emissions were evoked using continuouslyswept tones, to separate the generator component and investigate the corresponding compressive characteristic. For hearing imapired listeners, the estimates from the two methods were highly correlated.

[1]  Torsten Dau,et al.  Investigating time-efficiency of forward masking paradigms for estimating basilar membrane input-output characteristics , 2017, PloS one.

[2]  C. Abdala,et al.  Towards a joint reflection-distortion otoacoustic emission profile: Results in normal and impaired ears. , 2017, The Journal of the Acoustical Society of America.

[3]  T. Janssen,et al.  The level and growth behavior of the 2 f1-f2 distortion product otoacoustic emission and its relationship to auditory sensitivity in normal hearing and cochlear hearing loss. , 1998, The Journal of the Acoustical Society of America.

[4]  E. Lopez-Poveda,et al.  Cochlear nonlinearity in normal-hearing subjects as inferred psychophysically and from distortion-product otoacoustic emissions. , 2008, The Journal of the Acoustical Society of America.

[5]  Stephen T Neely,et al.  Influence of in situ, sound-level calibration on distortion-product otoacoustic emission variability. , 2008, The Journal of the Acoustical Society of America.

[6]  A. Oxenham,et al.  Recovery from on- and off-frequency forward masking in listeners with normal and impaired hearing. , 2010, The Journal of the Acoustical Society of America.

[7]  P. A. Dorn,et al.  Cochlear compression estimates from measurements of distortion-product otoacoustic emissions. , 2003, The Journal of the Acoustical Society of America.

[8]  D A Nelson,et al.  A new procedure for measuring peripheral compression in normal-hearing and hearing-impaired listeners. , 2001, The Journal of the Acoustical Society of America.

[9]  G. Long,et al.  Measuring distortion product otoacoustic emissions using continuously sweeping primaries. , 2008, The Journal of the Acoustical Society of America.

[10]  Andrew J Oxenham,et al.  Comparing different estimates of cochlear compression in listeners with normal and impaired hearing. , 2005, The Journal of the Acoustical Society of America.