Stimulus presentation order and the perception of lexical tones in Cantonese.

Listeners' auditory discrimination of vowel sounds depends in part on the order in which stimuli are presented. Such presentation order effects have been argued to be language independent, and to result from psychophysical (not speech- or language-specific) factors such as the decay of memory traces over time or increased weighting of later-occurring stimuli. In the present study, native Cantonese speakers' discrimination of a linguistic tone continuum is shown to exhibit order of presentation effects similar to those shown for vowels in previous studies. When presented with two successive syllables differing in fundamental frequency by approximately 4 Hz, listeners were significantly more sensitive to this difference when the first syllable was higher in frequency than the second. However, American English-speaking listeners with no experience listening to Cantonese showed no such contrast effect when tested in the same manner using the same stimuli. Neither English nor Cantonese listeners showed any order of presentation effects in the discrimination of a nonspeech continuum in which tokens had the same fundamental frequencies as the Cantonese speech tokens but had a qualitatively non-speech-like timbre. These results suggest that tone presentation order effects, unlike vowel effects, may be language specific, possibly resulting from the need to compensate for utterance-related pitch declination when evaluating fundamental frequency for tone identification.

[1]  John J. Ohala,et al.  Production of Tone , 1978 .

[2]  W. P. Tanner,et al.  Experimental Study of “Tone Deafness” , 1964 .

[3]  Jacqueline Vaissière,et al.  Phonetic Explanations for Cross-Linguistic Prosodic Similarities , 1995 .

[4]  P. Wong THE EFFECT OF DOWNDRIFT IN THE PRODUCTION AND PERCEPTION OF CANTONESE LEVEL TONES , 1999 .

[5]  N Kraus,et al.  Neural representation of consciously imperceptible speech sound differences , 2000, Perception & psychophysics.

[6]  S. Schumm,et al.  Experimental Study of Channel Patterns , 1972 .

[7]  N. Umeda “F0 declination” is situation dependent , 1982 .

[8]  B. C. Griffith,et al.  The discrimination of speech sounds within and across phoneme boundaries. , 1957, Journal of experimental psychology.

[9]  Jack L. Vevea,et al.  Why do categories affect stimulus judgment? , 2000, Journal of experimental psychology. General.

[10]  Alexander L. Francis,et al.  On the (non)categorical perception of lexical tones , 2003, Perception & psychophysics.

[11]  M. Dorman,et al.  Neurophysiologic correlates of cross-language phonetic perception. , 2000, The Journal of the Acoustical Society of America.

[12]  J. Pierrehumbert The perception of fundamental frequency declination. , 1979, The Journal of the Acoustical Society of America.

[13]  A note on possible culture-bound effects in frequency discrimination. , 1980, The Journal of the Acoustical Society of America.

[14]  W T Maddox,et al.  Direct and indirect stimulus-frequency effects in recognition. , 1997, Journal of experimental psychology. Learning, memory, and cognition.

[15]  B H Repp,et al.  Categories and context in the perception of isolated steady-state vowels. , 1979, Journal of experimental psychology. Human perception and performance.

[16]  N I Durlach,et al.  Intensity perception. XIII. Perceptual anchor model of context-coding. , 1984, The Journal of the Acoustical Society of America.

[17]  R A Harshman,et al.  Crosslanguage Differences in Tone Perception: a Multidimensional Scaling Investigation , 1978, Language and speech.

[18]  L. Braida,et al.  Central and Peripheral Processes in the Perception of Speech and Nonspeech Sounds , 1987 .

[19]  L. Hedges,et al.  Categories and particulars: prototype effects in estimating spatial location. , 1991, Psychological review.

[20]  N. Cowan,et al.  The use of auditory and phonetic memory in vowel discrimination. , 1986, The Journal of the Acoustical Society of America.

[21]  L. Braida,et al.  Intensity perception. VII. Further data on roving-level discrimination and the resolution and bias edge effects. , 1977, The Journal of the Acoustical Society of America.

[22]  Philip Lieberman,et al.  Speech Physiology, Speech Perception, and Acoustic Phonetics , 1988 .

[23]  Neil A. Macmillan,et al.  Beyond the categorical/continuous distinction: A psychophysical approach to processing modes. , 1987 .

[24]  V. Ciocca,et al.  The development of the perception of Cantonese lexical tones , 2003 .

[25]  T. Carrell,et al.  Central auditory system plasticity: generalization to novel stimuli following listening training. , 1997, The Journal of the Acoustical Society of America.

[26]  P. Ladefoged A course in phonetics , 1975 .

[27]  Ake Hellstrom,et al.  The time-order error and its relatives: Mirrors of cognitive processes in comparing. , 1985 .

[28]  N. Umeda F0 Declination is situation dependent , 1980 .

[29]  D. Klatt,et al.  Analysis, synthesis, and perception of voice quality variations among female and male talkers. , 1990, The Journal of the Acoustical Society of America.

[30]  J. Steiger Differential sensitivity for frequency among speakers of a tone and a nontone language , 1993 .

[31]  C A Fowler,et al.  Fundamental frequency declination is not unique to human speech: evidence from nonhuman primates. , 1992, The Journal of the Acoustical Society of America.

[32]  James L. Flanagan,et al.  Pitch Discrimination for Synthetic Vowels , 1957 .

[33]  Neil A. Macmillan,et al.  Detection Theory: A User's Guide , 1991 .

[34]  Kenneth N. Stevens,et al.  On the quantal nature of speech , 1972 .

[35]  D. Klatt,et al.  Discrimination of fundamental frequency contours in synthetic speech: implications for models of pitch perception. , 1973, The Journal of the Acoustical Society of America.

[36]  J. R. Stagray,et al.  Differential Sensitivity for Frequency among Speakers of a Tone and a Nontone Language. , 1993 .

[37]  B. Repp,et al.  Stimulus order effects in vowel discrimination. , 1990, The Journal of the Acoustical Society of America.

[38]  Timothy J. Vance,et al.  An Experimental Investigation of Tone and Intonation in Cantonese , 1976 .

[39]  O. Bohn,et al.  A cross-language comparison of vowel perception in English-learning and German-learning infants. , 1996, The Journal of the Acoustical Society of America.