Increasing Team Coordination and Social Motivation through Awareness Practices: a Case Study

People working in teams are vulnerable to so-called “process losses,” which occur when the team’s output is less than what could be produced given the capabilities of the team members. Teams can develop practices that provide awareness of each other’s activities, thereby enabling them to coordinate activities better and reducing one of these process losses – coordination loss. Such awareness is harder to maintain when team members are geographically dispersed, but can be promoted using social computing technologies. We present a framework derived from a case study that identifies drivers of awareness practices in geographically dispersed teams. Our investigation indicates that new awareness practices were developed at times when the teams faced changes in the team’s goals, social computing context, physical context, and team structure. The teams developed awareness practices to improve coordination in the teams, but the practices had the added effect of decreasing social motivation losses. Based on these results, organizations that are considering implementing social computing technologies such as life streaming and microblogging are advised to take social motivation into account formulating their implementation strategies. Designers and users of social computing technology are similarly advised to consider latent social motivation effects that might occur in organizational teams when social computing technology and practices are introduced.

[1]  Christian Heath,et al.  Collaboration and controlCrisis management and multimedia technology in London Underground Line Control Rooms , 1992, Computer Supported Cooperative Work (CSCW).

[2]  S. Kiesler,et al.  Applying Common Identity and Bond Theory to Design of Online Communities , 2007 .

[3]  Sirkka L. Jarvenpaa,et al.  Communication and Trust in Global Virtual Teams , 1999, J. Comput. Mediat. Commun..

[4]  Russell Haines,et al.  The User-Centered Nature of Awareness Creation in Computer-mediated Communication , 2011, ICIS.

[5]  Alfred Schuetz On Multiple Realities , 1945 .

[6]  Sirkka L. Jarvenpaa,et al.  Communication and Trust in Global Virtual Teams , 1999 .

[7]  Guido Hertel,et al.  The Köhler Group Motivation Gain: How to Motivate the ‘Weak Links’ in a Group , 2011 .

[8]  James D. Herbsleb,et al.  Team Knowledge and Coordination in Geographically Distributed Software Development , 2007, J. Manag. Inf. Syst..

[9]  Jerald Greenberg,et al.  Social comparison processes in organizations , 2007 .

[10]  Paul Dourish,et al.  Awareness and coordination in shared workspaces , 1992, CSCW '92.

[11]  Andrea B. Hollingshead,et al.  Transactive Memory Systems in Organizations: Matching Tasks, Expertise, and People , 2004, Organ. Sci..

[12]  Brian S. Butler,et al.  Membership Size, Communication Activity, and Sustainability: A Resource-Based Model of Online Social Structures , 2001, Inf. Syst. Res..

[13]  Lawrence J. Sanna,et al.  Group Performance And Interaction , 1998 .

[14]  Nicolas Michinov,et al.  Improving productivity and creativity in online groups through social comparison process: New evidence for asynchronous electronic brainstorming , 2005, Comput. Hum. Behav..

[15]  Alain Pinsonneault,et al.  Electronic Brainstorming: The Illusion of Productivity , 1999, Inf. Syst. Res..

[16]  Alfred Schutz On Multiple Realities , 1962 .

[17]  Suprateek Sarker,et al.  Understanding Virtual Team Development: An Interpretive Study , 2003, J. Assoc. Inf. Syst..

[18]  Jay F. Nunamaker,et al.  Invoking Social Comparison to Improve Electronic Brainstorming: Beyond Anonymity , 1995, J. Manag. Inf. Syst..

[19]  Guido Hertel,et al.  Managing distance by interdependence: Goal setting, task interdependence, and team-based rewards in virtual teams , 2004 .

[20]  Samer Faraj,et al.  Why Should I Share? Examining Social Capital and Knowledge Contribution in Electronic Networks of Practice , 2005, MIS Q..

[21]  Anit Somech,et al.  Is Group Productivity Loss the Rule or The Exception? Effects of Culture and Group-Based Motivation , 1996 .

[22]  Kevin Crowston,et al.  The interdisciplinary study of coordination , 1994, CSUR.

[23]  Kai Riemer,et al.  Towards a Practice Understanding of the Creation of Awareness in Distributed Work , 2007, ICIS.

[24]  Carl Gutwin,et al.  Workspace awareness for groupware , 1996, CHI Conference Companion.

[25]  Xin Li,et al.  Using Social Psychology to Motivate Contributions to Online Communities , 2005, J. Comput. Mediat. Commun..

[26]  Jane E. Klobas,et al.  Transactive memory systems in organizations: Implications for knowledge directories , 2008, Decis. Support Syst..

[27]  Dan Cosley,et al.  Think different: increasing online community participation using uniqueness and group dissimilarity , 2004, CHI.