A test-retest dataset for assessing long-term reliability of brain morphology and resting-state brain activity

We present a test-retest dataset for evaluation of long-term reliability of measures from structural and resting-state functional magnetic resonance imaging (sMRI and rfMRI) scans. The repeated scan dataset was collected from 61 healthy adults in two sessions using highly similar imaging parameters at an interval of 103–189 days. However, as the imaging parameters were not completely identical, the reliability estimated from this dataset shall reflect the lower bounds of the true reliability of sMRI/rfMRI measures. Furthermore, in conjunction with other test-retest datasets, our dataset may help explore the impact of different imaging parameters on reliability of sMRI/rfMRI measures, which is especially critical for assessing datasets collected from multiple centers. In addition, intelligence quotient (IQ) was measured for each participant using Raven’s Advanced Progressive Matrices. The data can thus be used for purposes other than assessing reliability of sMRI/rfMRI alone. For example, data from each single session could be used to associate structural and functional measures of the brain with the IQ metrics to explore brain-IQ association.

[1]  Cedric E. Ginestet,et al.  Intrinsic gray-matter connectivity of the brain in adults with autism spectrum disorder , 2013, Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences.

[2]  A. Caramazza,et al.  Predicting Conceptual Processing Capacity from Spontaneous Neuronal Activity of the Left Middle Temporal Gyrus , 2012, The Journal of Neuroscience.

[3]  John T Cacioppo,et al.  Great expectations: what can fMRI research tell us about psychological phenomena? , 2009, International journal of psychophysiology : official journal of the International Organization of Psychophysiology.

[4]  Yong He,et al.  Altered baseline brain activity in children with ADHD revealed by resting-state functional MRI. , 2007, Brain & development.

[5]  Kerri Smith,et al.  Brain imaging: fMRI 2.0 , 2012, Nature.

[6]  B. Biswal,et al.  Functional connectivity in the motor cortex of resting human brain using echo‐planar mri , 1995, Magnetic resonance in medicine.

[7]  M. Fox,et al.  Spontaneous fluctuations in brain activity observed with functional magnetic resonance imaging , 2007, Nature Reviews Neuroscience.

[8]  R. Cameron Craddock,et al.  A comprehensive assessment of regional variation in the impact of head micromovements on functional connectomics , 2013, NeuroImage.

[9]  P. Skudlarski,et al.  Brain Connectivity Related to Working Memory Performance , 2006, The Journal of Neuroscience.

[10]  O. Sporns,et al.  Complex brain networks: graph theoretical analysis of structural and functional systems , 2009, Nature Reviews Neuroscience.

[11]  Claudinei E. Biazoli,et al.  Commentary: A test-retest dataset for assessing long-term reliability of brain morphology and resting-state brain activity , 2017, Front. Neurosci..

[12]  X. Zuo,et al.  Test-retest reliabilities of resting-state FMRI measurements in human brain functional connectomics: A systems neuroscience perspective , 2014, Neuroscience & Biobehavioral Reviews.

[13]  Jia Liu,et al.  Measuring individual morphological relationship of cortical regions , 2014, Journal of Neuroscience Methods.

[14]  X. Wang,et al.  The network property of the thalamus in the default mode network is correlated with trait mindfulness , 2014, Neuroscience.

[15]  Yufeng Zang,et al.  Individual Differences in Impulsivity Predict Head Motion during Magnetic Resonance Imaging , 2014, PloS one.

[16]  Y. Zang,et al.  Altered baseline brain activity in children with ADHD revealed by resting-state functional MRI , 2007, Brain and Development.

[17]  J. Giedd,et al.  Brain development in children and adolescents: Insights from anatomical magnetic resonance imaging , 2006, Neuroscience & Biobehavioral Reviews.

[18]  Markus Plank,et al.  Resting-State fMRI Activity Predicts Unsupervised Learning and Memory in an Immersive Virtual Reality Environment , 2014, PloS one.

[19]  X. Li,et al.  The brain structure correlates of individual differences in trait mindfulness: A voxel-based morphometry study , 2014, Neuroscience.

[20]  Zonglei Zhen,et al.  Individual differences in cortical face selectivity predict behavioral performance in face recognition , 2014, Front. Hum. Neurosci..

[21]  G. Rees,et al.  The structural basis of inter-individual differences in human behaviour and cognition , 2011, Nature Reviews Neuroscience.

[22]  Xueting Li,et al.  Serotonin transporter gene polymorphism (5‐HTTLPR) influences trait anxiety by modulating the functional connectivity between the amygdala and insula in Han Chinese males , 2015, Human brain mapping.

[23]  Arno Villringer,et al.  Dynamic Properties of Human Brain Structure: Learning-Related Changes in Cortical Areas and Associated Fiber Connections , 2010, The Journal of Neuroscience.

[24]  D. Bors,et al.  Raven's Advanced Progressive Matrices: Norms for First-Year University Students and the Development of a Short Form , 1998 .

[25]  Richard S. J. Frackowiak,et al.  Navigation-related structural change in the hippocampi of taxi drivers. , 2000, Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America.

[26]  X. Wang,et al.  Regional amplitude of the low-frequency fluctuations at rest predicts word-reading skill , 2015, Neuroscience.

[27]  C. Kelly,et al.  Relationship between cingulo-insular functional connectivity and autistic traits in neurotypical adults. , 2009, The American journal of psychiatry.

[28]  Chenwang Jin,et al.  Amplitude of Low Frequency Fluctuation Abnormalities in Adolescents with Online Gaming Addiction , 2013, PloS one.

[29]  Bing Chen,et al.  An open science resource for establishing reliability and reproducibility in functional connectomics , 2014, Scientific Data.

[30]  Siyuan Hu,et al.  Different neural pathways linking personality traits and eudaimonic well-being: a resting-state functional magnetic resonance imaging study , 2015, Cognitive, affective & behavioral neuroscience.

[31]  Daniel D. Dilks,et al.  Resting-State Neural Activity across Face-Selective Cortical Regions Is Behaviorally Relevant , 2011, The Journal of Neuroscience.