The Herbst appliance--its biologic effects and clinical use.

The purpose of this article is to survey the Herbst bite-jumping method. An outline of appliance design and appliance construction is given. The effects of the treatment method on the dentofacial complex and on the masticatory system have been analyzed with the aid of dental casts, cephalometric roentgenograms, and electromyographic registrations from the masticatory muscles. The use and effectiveness of the Herbst appliance in the treatment of Class II malocclusions are exemplified by clinical cases, some of which were followed for 5 years after treatment. The Herbst appliance is most effective in the treatment of Class II malocclusions, provided it is used as indicated. Thus, the appliance must be limited to growing persons only. The treatment method should not be looked upon as a last resort to be used only when other treatment approaches have failed. Treatment prognosis is best in subjects with a brachyfacial growth pattern. Unfavorable growth, unstable occlusal conditions, and persisting oral habits after treatment are potential risk factors for occlusal relapses. As treatment with the Herbst appliance is performed during a relatively short period, the hard and soft tissues (teeth, bone, and musculature) would need some time for adaptation to the new mandibular position after the appliance is removed. Posttreatment retention as a routine with a removable functional appliance is therefore recommended.

[1]  Langford Nm,et al.  The Herbst appliance. , 1981 .

[2]  H. Pancherz Activity of the temporal and masseter muscles in class II, division 1 malocclusions. An electromyographic investigation. , 1980, American journal of orthodontics.

[3]  U. Posselt Physiology of occlusion and rehabilitation , 1968 .

[4]  H. Pancherz,et al.  Temporal and masseter muscle activity in children and adults with normal occlusion. An electromyographic investigation. , 1980, Acta odontologica Scandinavica.

[5]  H. Pancherz Vertical dentofacial changes during Herbst appliance treatment. A cephalometric investigation. , 1982, Swedish dental journal. Supplement.

[6]  H. Pancherz,et al.  Hemifacial microsomia treated with the Herbst appliance. Report of a case analyzed by means of roentgen stereometry and metallic implants. , 1982, American journal of orthodontics.

[7]  H. Pancherz The effect of continuous bite jumping on the dentofacial complex: a follow-up study after Herbst appliance treatment of class II malocclusions. , 1981, European journal of orthodontics.

[8]  H. Pancherz Treatment of class II malocclusions by jumping the bite with the Herbst appliance. A cephalometric investigation. , 1979, American journal of orthodontics.

[9]  H Pancherz,et al.  The mechanism of Class II correction in Herbst appliance treatment. A cephalometric investigation. , 1982, American journal of orthodontics.

[10]  H. Pancherz,et al.  The effect of continuous bite jumping with the Herbst appliance on the masticatory system: a functional analysis of treated class II malocclusions. , 1982, European journal of orthodontics.

[11]  Farrar Wb Diagnosis and treatment of anterior dislocation of the articular disc. , 1971 .

[12]  H. Pancherz,et al.  Muscle activity in class II, division 1 malocclusions treated by bite jumping with the Herbst appliance. An electromyographic study. , 1980, American journal of orthodontics.

[13]  A. Jacobson,et al.  The MARS appliance. Report of a case. , 1982, American journal of orthodontics.