A Filmless Radiology Department in a Full Digital Regional Hospital: Quantitative Evaluation of the Increased Quality and Efficiency

Reggio Emilia hospital installed Picture Archiving and Communications Systems (PACS) as the final step towards a completely digital clinical environment completing the HIS/EMR and 1,400 web/terminals for patient information access. Financial benefits throughout the hospital were assessed upfront and measured periodically. Key indicators (radiology exam turnaround time, number of radiology procedures performed, inpatients length of stay before and after the PACS implementation, etc.) were analyzed and values were statistically tested to assess workflow and productivity improvements. The hospital went “filmless” in 28 weeks. Between the half of 2004 and the respective period in 2003, overall Radiology Department productivity increased by 12%, TAT improved by more than 60%. Timelier patient care resulted in decreased lengths of stay. Neurology alone experienced a 12% improvement in average patient stay. To quantify the impact of PACS on the average hospital stays and the expected productivity benefits to inpatient productivity were used a “high level” and a “detailed” business model. Annual financial upsides have exceeded $1.9 millions/year. A well-planned PACS deployment simplifies imaging workflow and improves patient care throughout the hospital while delivering substantial financial benefits. Staff buy-in was the key in this process and on-going training and process monitoring are a must.

[1]  Steve G. Langer Impact of Speech Recognition on Radiologist Productivity , 2002, Journal of Digital Imaging.

[2]  Hajime Harauchi,et al.  Time and flow study results before and after installation of a hospital information system and radiology information system and before clinical use of a picture archiving and communication system , 2009, Journal of Digital Imaging.

[3]  E L Siegel,et al.  Effect of filmless imaging on the utilization of radiologic services. , 2000, Radiology.

[4]  Glenn S. Forbes,et al.  Electronic imaging impact on image and report turnaround times , 2009, Journal of Digital Imaging.

[5]  Bruce I. Reiner,et al.  SCAR Radiologic Technologist Survey: Analysis of the Impact of Digital Technologies on Productivity , 2002, Journal of Digital Imaging.

[6]  Khan M Siddiqui,et al.  Multi-institutional analysis of computed and direct radiography: part II. Economic analysis. , 2005, Radiology.

[7]  Barbara Dumery Digital image archiving: challenges and choices. , 2002, Radiology management.

[8]  Charles Maynard Multi-institutional Analysis of Computed and Direct Radiography. Part II. Economic AnalysisReiner BI, Salkever D, Siegel EL, et al (Veterans Affairs Maryland Healthcare System, Baltimore; Univ of Maryland, Baltimore; Johns Hopkins Univ, Baltimore, Md) Radiology 236:420–426, 2005§ , 2006 .

[9]  Palmino Sacco,et al.  PACS implementation in a university hospital in Tuscany. , 2002, Journal of digital imaging.

[10]  H. K. Huang,et al.  PACS and Imaging Informatics: Basic Principles and Applications , 2004 .

[11]  G. Paré,et al.  Toward a multidimensional assessment of picture archiving and communication system success , 2005, International Journal of Technology Assessment in Health Care.

[12]  Khan M Siddiqui,et al.  Multi-institutional analysis of computed and direct radiography: part I. Technologist productivity. , 2005, Radiology.

[13]  Guy Paré,et al.  Impact of PACS on Dictation Turnaround Time and Productivity , 2005, Journal of Digital Imaging.

[14]  Nelson E. King,et al.  Predicting Clinical Image Delivery Time by Monitoring PACS Queue Behavior , 2006, Journal of Digital Imaging.

[15]  Karen Ondo PACS Direct Experiences: Implementation, Selection, Benefits Realized , 2004, Journal of Digital Imaging.